Thread 18517453

What's next for them?

>>18517453 (OP)
Is that an AI picture? I assumed Gentlemen's Gazette would be above such things

>>18517455
I mean it's obvious just by the look of it that it's AI, but it's remarkably tight on the details in this case, it took me a while to spot any true redflags beyond the general feel of the image, but here they are
>no reflection fo the second guy in the mirror
>the bottom of the waistcoat has 2 buttonholes
>the lamp is attached to a mirror in multiple places
>the hose seems to split in two on the bathtub
It is AI

Tip #1: don't use the women's room
Sad that that even needs to be said, says alot about America today.

>>18517453 (OP)
I've made this rant before but I'll make it again

Gentlemen's Gazette, along with the majority of classic menswear enthusiasts are completely out of touch with reality.
Formality does not exist on the scale they think it does.
Black tie is not semi-formal anymore. That is a label that has been outdated for many many decades.
Formality is a scale that is constantly changing as the fashions of the day change. Once upon a time, formal wear meant a clean white toga, but if you showed up to court in a toga today, you'd be sent to the mental hospital.
Pretty much anything in the classic menswear wardrobe today is dressy, even chinos are dressy today. Even jeans have become distinctly more formal than sweatpants. Converse shoes have become more formal than running shoes. This isn't an opinion, this is reality, whether you like it or not.

>>18517461
Nobody gives a fuck about what millennial and zoomer manchildren think is formal or not. Formality will be followed the right way, especially to cleanse the millennial depravity from society. Only pathetic manchildren will consider jeans and converse sneakers as formal. Get the fuck out of here with that stupidity.

>>18517463
They can be formal when paired with a long sleeve button shirt and a full zip vest.

>>18517466
lol

>>18517461
They preach and obey "rules" that are worthless

Their obeying outdated notions of formality is one of these. Someone, somewhere told them that blacktie is semi-formal, and they just blindly obey this and preach it to others without ever considering the nature of formality in society.
But they do this for many more things such as buttoning rules, rules about the kinds of shoes they can wear, the kinds of colours they can wear in what environments.

But the reality is that not only is the suit antiquated, but so are its rules, and even the society they existed in.
You can wear a suit... but you have to acknowledge that it is not normal, and according to the norms of society, it is also not classy or respectful or whatever term you want to use.
Showing up to a get-together in a suit becuase the invitation said "casual" and then trying to argue that a suit is actually casual does not make you right, you have violated the rules of formality as they exist in the modern day.
>>18517463
You can open your own establishment and enforce your own ideas of formality. But there is no objectivity in formality, it is entirely dependent on what society as a whole deems formal.

>>18517466
I hope you're trolling.

>>18517469
You can wear a suit... but you have to do it with the understanding that you are breaking the rules of society in terms of fashion.
You may be able to fly under the radar by allowing people to think you're going to court, or to a funeral, or a job interview, but if they enquire, and you are forced to tell them the truth, then you should embrace the truth, you are wearing a suit because you like it... it doesn't have to be any more complicated than that.

It does make you look sharper, it does make you feel more civilised, more put together... but the fundamental reason is that you just simply like it. You are given two options for what to wear, one is a suit, and the other is a not-suit, and you're personal taste has told you that you like the suit more, that's all you need.

But please disregard the silly notions of it being more respectful or being better dressed. These reasons are wholly dependent on the judgement of society, and the simple fact is that society has rejected the suit, and anyone wearing the suit for leisure is not respected by society.

>>18517475
And now I'm going to praise Reviewbrah to high heavens, not because I think he actually looks good in a suit, I think he looks pretty goofy. I praise him because he is the only one in this fashion sphere that is earnest.

He doesn't pretend he has some socially accepted reason to wear a suit.
He doesn't pretend he is better for wearing a suit.
He doesn't pretend to look good in a suit.
He simply wears a suit... because he likes to wear a suit, and that's the way to be.

>>18517479
How do you feel about Gent Z?

>>18517480
Gent Z? I haven't heard of them

>>18517482
Him, actually. He did a collab video with Gentleman's Gazette a while ago.

>>18517469
Suits aren't antiquated in most of the world, retard. People that actually matter, unlike zoomer and millennial manchildren, still wear suits the right way.

>>18517469
The rules of formality today are gay.
Dressing nicely today is contrarian if you're doing it because you like the look.

I wrote before seeing the following posts

>>18517485
You post a picture of people leaving an office. These people do not wear a suit outside of work. It is a uniform, they are forced to wear it, and the one in the darker suit is obviously unaware and likely indifferent to how poor his suit fits.
This is not an argument for the popularity of suits, but rather for its decline.

THIS is a picture from the past, of a guy walking his dog. Admittedly it's an obviously staged photograph, but all photographs from this era are staged. The point is, this man is not wearing a forced uniform, he is not going to an office, he is not going to court, he is wearing a suit because in his day, a suit was socially acceptable, essentially casual clothing

>>18517490
This image looks AI generated...

>>18517461
Lol: learn to read between the lines at least a little. What is the point of your rant when the GG guys basically agree with everything you said? They essentially admit to larping because they like the aesthetics better

>>18517453 (OP)
so can i nuke the toilet in home depot? a simple yes or no will do

>>18517453 (OP)
How to take cock like a gentleman, How to suck penis like a gentleman

>>18517458
Literally none of these are indicative of AI.

>>18517459
but the ladies' room are often fancier, some even have couches in them

>>18517480
>>18517482
hes just another obnoxious menswear influencer. he is handsome though but that's the only redeemable part of his content

>>18517453 (OP)
real men, real style. Sorry bozos but I've already took lessons on bathroom etiquette from the alpha male himself

>>18517461
>YOU MUST TOLERATE MEDIOCRITY IN MENS FASHION BECAUSE..BECAUSE YOU JUST HAVE TO OKAY
Basedlennials like you is why we got retarded manchildren like John Fetterman waddling around congress in a hoodie

>>18517817
It's called streetwear and it's much cooler than whatever you oldheads wear

>>18517461
>>18517469
>>18517490
This

Where have all the bathroom attendants gone?

>>18518159
you could simplify even further by getting rid of the vest guy (nobody wears that shit) and the 'blazer over t shirt' guy (not actually bizcaz)
basically the only modes of male fashion are casual, bizcaz, and suit.

>>18518159
Not only have the garments of formality changed, but the events of formality have changed also

In the past there were dinner parties, balls, opera and other such fancy get togethers, alongside weddings and interviews and whatnot.
Nowadays, most of those things have fallen out of regular life, even for a rich person. The opera was once something you would go to on a monthly basis, for some people it was even weekly. These days, even for someone who likes opera, it's unlikely they'll go more than once a year.
Balls and dinner parties just straight up don't exist at all anymore, maybe you'll go to one once in your entire life time, and it'll be a deliberately contrived thing.

What this means is that, owning a tuxedo/dinner suit for when you go to a dinner party is completely pointless because you will never go to a dinner party.
Today, a casual outing is going to the shop, or just for a walk.
One step up from that is going out on a Friday night, a date, or some other outing with friends, you "dress up" for these by putting on your clean sneakers that cost more than your regular sneakers and you make sure your tshirt is ironed. This is the modern day equivelent of the tuxedo.
One step up from that are weddings, interviews, court, etc. Weddings in particular are far more rare than in the past because people don't get married nearly as much as they used to. You'll own one suit that you will wear for all of these becuase they're only one-day events, you don't need more than one.
And that's it. It's extremely unlikely you'll ever need to go to any kind of formal celebratory event, and even if you do, nobody is going to turn you away at the door for wearing your one business suit that you own to it.

>>18517459
I was burdened with this decision today. Mens(occupied)and women’s(open) single bathroom. Guy was taking a huge shit and I had to piss. I waited it out like a gentleman

>>18518210
It's an interesting assessment on formality. I do agree that the needs of a modern man only include a singular suit for the events you mentioned, if even that, however I think that the dying of formality could also free suits and evening wear from being related to the closet by those who wish to wear them. Currently we have more socially acceptable standards of dress than ever before, and as the business suit vanishes from offices in the West, it should simply become an outfit for people that simply like the style. Hell I'll go further and say I'd wear a tuxedo out for a fancy dinner just because I feel like a million bucks wearing it. If there's almost no meaning to the clothing in the society, then it should be released back and allowed to exist for those that want it.

>>18517466
Retard

>>18517480
I don't listen to rap

>>18517490
That suit looks like absolute dogshit

>>18517455
>>18517458
Are you dumb? AI was trained on this art style, it's been around for decades

>>18518159
Cummerbunds are not a costume piece

>>18518159
>bowties are LARP/Costume

>>18520656
You make a good point, I have fixed the chart.

>>18520658
It's claiming that evening wear (full dress tailcoat and tuxedos) are LARP

>>18520704
They all have bowties
>>18520666
Why'd you get rid of the black guys?

>>18520706
I just noticed the dude on the right in the group having a blue bowtie, thought it was some creative black tie nonsense. What could have had merit as a statement on the death of evening wear is just a retarded fixation on bowties. Sad.

Agreed. Suits are antiquated pos, and the only people who still wear them are wagecucks and tryhards who think they look cool or rich.

In reality the only women who like men in suits are 35+. Any young attractive girl that is not looking for a sugar daddy or a rich beta to marry will instantly cringe when seeing a guy in a suit. Even if you're her age, you'll be seen as an out of place dad/uncle.

Streetwear is king

>>18520788
You can keep the roasties.

>>18520790
He’s right. If you want to attract cute young girls, dress cool, not professional. You’d get more respect wearing a tracksuit over a business suit.

>>18520788
>clothes tailored specifically for your body's proportions and meant to look as elegant and functional as possible, and built to last for years and decades, are antiquated
Of course a retarded zoomer/millennial consoomer faggot who wears cheap disposable oversized trash bags or skintight body condoms would think that.

>>18517458
>>18520655
This is all so sad.

>>18520813
Don't blame the player, blame the game. Young girls hate suits and yuppies

>>18520872
Young girls are retarded. They don't know what they want. If you have the game, you can "rizz" a young girl even by dressing like a rabbi. All you need is confidence and charm. Also, a lot of k-pop twinks wear suits, and young girls love that. The problem isn't suits. It's (you).

An outfit like this will drench the panties of a young girl.

Or even this.

>>18520893
>logo shirt with a suit jacket
No wonder Korean's let their women become comfort women.

>>18520884
Wrong. And the girls into Kpop are BPD alt “goth” girls. Your basic girl isn’t into Asians.

>>18520897
All girls want a pretty boy, not a roid mutant. Which is why boy bands were so popular among young girls across the world throughout the 90s and 200s. Between negrified roid monkeys in sweatpants and a pretty boy dressed in a suit, girls will pick the pretty boi every time.

>>18520897
All girls want a pretty boy, not a roid mutant. Which is why boy bands were so popular among young girls across the world throughout the 90s and 2000s. Between negrified roid monkeys in sweatpants and a pretty boy dressed in a suit, girls will pick the pretty boi every time.

You fucks are going to tell me girls wouldn't be into this? The reason why men these days can't pull off a suit is because they are low-T submissive retards. There's a certain body language, attitude and aura you need to have while wearing a suit, because it's an outfit of power, status and dignity. If you behave like a skulking incel school shooter while wearing a suit, then of course you'll look like shit.

>gooks and boybands from 20 years ago
i just know your apartment smells like cat piss, sis

>>18517799
GENTLEMEN now I KNOW some of you have some absolutely *slight pause* SPICY plans with some *slight pause* SPICY SENIORITAS that may or may not involve a lil bit of tongue action on your bidoodoo if yer catching m'drift, heh heh. NOW I KNOW! some of you are thinking "Hey alpha! I don't need to take advice from a man in his 40's or whatever on how to get my ass eaten" and GENTLEMEN... I UNDERSTAND where you're coming from I mean there's no way a guy like Alpha gets his ass eaten, right? WRONG! Girls love eating my hairy stinky manjayjay all the time! I employ proper POOPING etiquette WHENEVER I step onto the Johnson. Gentlemen here are TEN TIPS for you to POOP... like a gentleman *gets close to camera, making it lose focus, abrupt cut*

>>18521204
>>18520928

This. Take the same people and put them in cool contemporary clothing and they'll do much better. Even Brad Pitt would be rejected looking like an uncle in that suit. Zoomer girls HATE suits and yuppies, how much clearer can I make it for you incels?

>>18518205
>the vest guy (nobody wears that shit)
why though
I think the 3pc suit looks so much better than just the jacket alone
people should do it more

>>18520884
>>18520886
>>18520887
>>18520888
>>18520891
>>18520893
>>18520894
>>18520896
massive fucking deja vu just now, I regret posting in this thread
is this a bot thread or something? I recall this exact fucking sequence being posted before

>repetitive behaviors, such as making countless threads about the same topic and posting the same pictures with the same opinions each time
>difficulty understanding that different people might have different tastes, opinions and attitudes from them and from one another
>strict adherence to rules and schemas, such as classic menswear conventions
>distress and complaints when such schemas are (partially) ignored, such as when a suit is worn without a shirt, or a shirt is worn without an undershirt
The above are all symptoms linked with autism spectrum disorders.
>even Brad Pitt would be rejected if he didn't dress well
I invite you to test this theory by asking every girl you know, online is fine too.

>>18521569
Zoomer girls don't hate suits you retarded tranny. Like I've already said, girls like it when pretty boys and real men wear suits, because suits are the ultimate power and status outfit. All the boy bands from the 90s to current K-pop ones are the proof of it. If a low T chuds like you wore it, they'll look like a school shooter in a cosplay. The same way a skinnyfat insecure guy would look like a fucking retard if he wore a leather jacket and biker outfit. To wear a suit you need the right attitude and body language.

>>18521602
>real men wear suits
>If a low T chuds like you wore it
and yet suits are mostly worn by politicians and office wagies and are mostly associated with balding men in their 50s wasting taxpayers money

>>18521608
You talk like commie or a jealous nigger.

>>18521609
alright post a real men wearing a suit. this century only, no actors or other media personalities

>>18521610
Modern slim fit suits look like shit, so there are none. Probably why people hate suits these days to begin with and think they're uncomfortable. They wear them like millennial skinny jeans and slim fit shirts.

>>18521613
get your head outta the gutter schizo nobody's into slim fit anymore

>>18521614
We're talking about men here, not you trannies.

>>18521620
those are ysl models actually

>>18521613
Literally looks like Peewee Herman or a comedy dummy.