← Home ← Back to /fa/

Thread 18522880

30 posts 18 images /fa/
Anonymous No.18522880 >>18522884 >>18522952 >>18522956 >>18522960 >>18523171 >>18525767 >>18525965 >>18527784 >>18527806 >>18527869 >>18527874
Why is y2k/2000s fashion popular again?
I see women dressing like vidrel all the time. Brands like Miss Me jeans and bebe are coming back, what is causing this resurgence in 2000s fashion trends and brands?
Anonymous No.18522884 >>18523002
>>18522880 (OP)
Because minimalism is soul destroying slop.
Anonymous No.18522893 >>18523038
Your first 20-year fashion cycle?
Anonymous No.18522952 >>18525965
>>18522880 (OP)
Its cute, but I'm tired of all the depop scalpers taking all the good shit from the thrift stores. You used to find way better stuff 5-10 years ago
Anonymous No.18522956
>>18522880 (OP)
20 year fashion/trend/nostalgia cycle retard
Anonymous No.18522960
>>18522880 (OP)
because braindead DEI's can't form an original thought
Anonymous No.18522964 >>18522967
Fashion goes in cycles. It's usually around 20 years before some fad is recycled.
Anonymous No.18522967 >>18522986 >>18525582 >>18525777
>>18522964
Bullshit, multitudes of young people in the 90s weren't dressed head to toe in 70s fashion nor were 70s youth dressed in 50s fashion. This is entirely a unique phenomenon driven by social media algorithms and a stunted economy.
Anonymous No.18522980
Zoomzooms have rotted their brains so every year for them is a new decade to fetishize.
Anonymous No.18522986
>>18522967
This. The only people who even wore bell bottoms in the 90s and 2000s were MILFs in their 50s.
Anonymous No.18523002
>>18522884
fpbp /thread
Anonymous No.18523038
>>18522893
Other generations took some wore clothes from previous fashion cycles with their own twist, zoomers just mimic 2000s styles
Anonymous No.18523171
>>18522880 (OP)
current pop culture has always been a cultural timebomb for future generations
Anonymous No.18525582 >>18525587
>>18522967
You're being delusional. 90s clothing was definitely inspired by 70s clothing.
Anonymous No.18525587
>>18525582
What? 90’s clothing was about looking like you don’t give a fuck. It was mostly comfort over form. 90’s higher fashion was just a dressed-down 80’s.
Anonymous No.18525605
20 year cycle, simple as. actualy y2k fashion is getting kind of hacky. If it hasnt already happened mid to late 2000s will come back, jesery shore guidos, emo kid hair, ed hardy shirts, proto hipster trucker hats and pabst blue ribbon
Anonymous No.18525767
>>18522880 (OP)
>what is causing this
Lots of zoomers grew up with bratz
Anonymous No.18525777 >>18527781
>>18522967
Yeah, "muh fashion goes in 20 year cycles" is a bullshit meme being peddled by fast fashion brands these days, because they've run out of ideas. Nobody went around dressed in 80s style of clothing in the 2000s. Pretty much every decade had its own unique look even until the 2010s. Nobody was recycling previous decades on a 20 year basis.
Anonymous No.18525965 >>18527806
>>18522880 (OP)
>>18522952
I need a black gf bros
Anonymous No.18527781
>>18525777
>ran out of ideas
This is pretty much why shopping at thrift stores is way more popular and acceptable than it used to be. It's harder to create new designs, it's easier to look to the past. I wouldn't be surprised if 2010s fashion becomes popular among gen alphas
Anonymous No.18527784 >>18527800
>>18522880 (OP)
Disgusting.
Anonymous No.18527800
>>18527784
Aw, cmon anon, 2000s video vixen isn't the only style coming back, emos and scene are back in style
Anonymous No.18527806 >>18527834 >>18527904
>>18522880 (OP)
she can't pull it off
>>18525965
is all fun and games, until it isn't.
Anonymous No.18527834
>>18527806
>is all fun and games, until it isn't.
Isn't this true about any type of gf?
Anonymous No.18527869
>>18522880 (OP)
y2k is overrated. I think 2k5, (2005) is way better.
Anonymous No.18527874 >>18527891
>>18522880 (OP)
What is her tik tok?
Anonymous No.18527891
>>18527874
Her tiktok is @nihaokailan1
Anonymous No.18527904 >>18527946
>>18527806
Yeah, she's fat by 2000s standards. People would be commenting on her "muffintop" and jiggling gut nonstop.

Feels like fashion for Zooms is just imitating styles in a retarded fashion and waiting for Millennials and Gen X to give them history lessons and headpats. Yall still brainrotted, imitative tards who can barely read or write.
Anonymous No.18527946 >>18527953
>>18527904
To be fair, many female celebrities and models at the time had what what we would consider eating disorders nowadays
Anonymous No.18527953
>>18527946
Not that many of them. So don't say "many female celebrities" as if that's common knowledge.

I'm telling you, can probably name like 5 who had clinically significant eating disorders vs the 50 who later claimed to have eating disorders because maybe for a year, they weren't pudgy and they want people to remember that year over the others.

I mean, I was there for it as a kid. You had the public skeleton from Allie McBeal towards the middle end of the 90s. You had cokefiend Fiona Apple in late late 90s. Add Amy Winehouse to that in early 2000s. Then you had supermodels, maybe ? Kate Moss? I mean, what you're saying is revisionist history to make fat-acceptance of the 2020s seem like progress, when it was really a dangerous, damaging psyop.

But back to fashion, I'm saying Zoomers don't understand the historical contexts of outfits. To them, these are costumes people wear for likes online. The concept, or the lifestyle represented by the clothing, doesn't have time to expand beyond that. It immediately gets processed into the online world for consumption.

That's why these outfits don't work. That's why this is cringe.