>>18526933 (OP)
I mean if you're absolutely hopeless and have never once thought about clothing it's a fine starting point
>>18526962
A common point of contention on fashion forums is whether or not to comment on people's bodies and faces because they can't as easily change them as their outfits. Generally, I lean toward not commenting on it because it's a sensitive subject and generally unproductive. That said, this guy would look a lot better if he weren't larping as an Anglo.
Also, those pants and shoes are a war crime, absolutely fucking awful.
>>18526962
If he was non anglo he would still look like a larper, and he would still be wearing those awful pants and shoes so chances are I would not say it's fine.
>>18527296
tacky
>>18527480
I'm pretty sure this dude is grooming teenagers but I cannot prove it
>>18528144
Depends on what you mean by 'social function.' I wear a Prada suit to church, and I've worn flashier suits to Christmas/ New Year's Eve parties etc. It's all about the crowd you're in really.
Used to wear CdG suits to uni, but then I was in a fashion program so it was fine.