Thread 18531207

if you're not /fit you can never be /fa you can look like a nice but still a pig. clothes matter only when you look good without them. try to prove me wrong you know its the truth.

tubby

>>18531207 (OP)
Big Dave mogs everyone on /fa/ AND /fit/.

>>18531207 (OP)
Gay bait thread. Anyone who thinks you can be fat and /fa/ are ragebaiting. Everyone on this board shares the same opinion, you retard.

a bit off-topic but since this bait thread is open I'll ask anyways.
So basically, I recently got /fit/ (10%-12% bodyfat) and now that I look good I actually took interest in fashion.
However, I am unsure what I should do on the fitness track, from /fa/'s perspective. Should I bulk to build up some muscles? Or remain skinny?
I am afraid that if I bulk too much, I'll have even harder time finding fitting clothes, plus I probably won't be able to use my current collection anymore.

>>18531221
How the fuck would we know without knowing what you actually look like? 10-12% bodyfat looks different on every human being on this planet.

>>18531229
Meant to reply >>18531223

>>18531229
don't want to send pics but basically thin with sixpack and some muscles.
i am 194cm and 80kg if that helps

>>18531207 (OP)
The overwhelming majority of male models aren't /fit/, they're tall with low body fat.
>>18531233
>194cm tall
>80kg
>some muscle
The reason you won't post a pic is that it would contradict your post.

>>18531223
Work your arms and shoulders to fill out a T-shirt and work out the rest of just enough you don't look uneven

>>18531233
Bigger than that is better from every perspective, because you're extremely skinny. But it's going to be hard to be bigger at your height, so you might have to settle for suboptimal.

>>18531218
my thread is invalid now

>>18531223
Unless you are on gear you will never get big enough to matter.

is the op nigga fr rn

>>18531207 (OP)
>if you're not /fit you can never be /fa you can look like a nice but still a pig.
This is not the hot take that you think it is.

>>18531223
ya i think its only really a issue if ur doin squats and getting jeans that fit proper. If you stay lean, it will take a whole lot of mass and work for your upper body to be a real issue. For me, the slim fit oxford shirts are a bit tighter but still functional, i feel like its to the benefit of the female gaze. My back is huge now and my lats fill out my shirts, another issue i see is like my shirt acting like a mop for sweat for parts of my upper back/chest which sticks to my body. This is more apparent in lightweight shirts.

Fit-wise though I feel like I just look better in most clothing, like I fill out the piece as if it was designed for me, which also gives me confidence and improves my self esteem.

>>18531223
>if I bulk too much
You're not getting huge in 3 months from lifting and eating, lad, it'll be more like 3 years

>>18531284
>>18531287
>>18531555
>>18531633
Thanks for the advice lads, I think I am gonna go for a moderate bulk.
Regarding legs, would you recommend to skip the leg day and just du cardio, or should I still do them? Under the assumption that I train purely for aesthetics.
For reference, I am currently doing a push pull legs workout.

>>18531934
For aesthetics as a natty there's no reason to focus on legs, I do around 6 sets of leg press for 8-12 reps per week as my only leg exercise and my legs look proportional to my upper body.
Everyone is different, but if you want to look good and be functional in daily life you don't need more than that.