Thread 18584744

this is what passes as "skinny pant" in the mind of the zoomer.

>>18584744 (OP)
Zoomers brain has been destroyed by TikTok. Trump was right when he tried to ban the social.

the 17-23yo boys love their oversized stuff trying to replicate jesse pinkman even though they don't. or when they get cybercigil tattoos trying to look cool even though they don't. their need for consumerism is so accelerated that they only get to the shore of the see

>>18584744 (OP)
Cargo pants aren't supposed to have faggy little leg opening. So no, your gay millennial tapered pants aren't "well-fitted".

>>18585113
>$20 at walmart
friggin sweet lois

>>18585120
>durrrrr more money = betterer clothes

>>18585124
?
i’m literally gonna go get those my dear snowflake

>>18584744 (OP)
>>18585113
>thrash
baggy, tapered
>based and well fitted
slim-fit, skinny

zoomers don't believe fashion is cyclical, kind of insane how dumb they can be

>>18585141
Sexcore is here to stay, forever

>>18584744 (OP)
cargo pants look disgusting no matter what and those aren't even well fitted
t. born 2005

>>18585141
I really can't wait until the Gen-A kids suddenly jump ship and go all slim/skinny fits in a few years. The zoomie pissbabies won't be able to handle it.

>>18585113
>pants should have big boy openings

what a zoomie moron.

Zoomie guys only like baggy shit because they simp for mentally ill zoomie women, who only took on baggy slop because they thought they were sticking it to men who check them out. If the zoomie thots went back to skinny and all that, then the dudes would fall right back in line behind it.

>>18585205
Yes they do you aging millennial retard, especially when it comes to cargo pants. If your pants don't have a minimum of 8" leg opening, you're a retarded cuck wearing yoga pants. You uncultured swines have no idea how pants should fit or drape over your legs and shoes.

>>18585233
That's not drape, that's you not knowing how to buy a proper inseam length, among other things. If you're going to buy dumpy, baggy pants, at least get the legs short enough to where it doesn't look like ill fitting hand me downs.

>>18585236
>stacking = wrong inseam
>straight and relaxed fit = muh dumpy muh baggy
God you millennials are so fucking cringe. What's wrong with you faggots? You niggers have never stepped out of your house and done anything physical in your entire life, have you?
You need extra length and stacking to ensure that your legs are always covered and protected even when you raise your leg, squat, or sit down. The roomy fit makes them more breathable and easy to move around in. And not to mention, the cargo pockets don't stick out weirdly when they're are full. That's what makes cargo pants look authentic and not like some faggy costume that you millennials used to wear in the 2010s.
Also, you morons do realize that your gay skinny fit and JNCO baggy fit are not the only fits that exist, right? That not everything that's not skinny is "baggy", right? Seriously, what's wrong with you morons?

a guy who sits in a computer chair for 12 hours a day told them not to like them.

I never thought 4chan would become so pathetic as to incessantly whine about the younger generations.

>>18585300
If you removed zoomer seethe you would get rid of 80% of the posts on this board.

>>18585113
>aren't supposed to
Depends on the pant. Some of them are meant to fit like that, and are meant to be tucked or bloused. Some are not.

>>18585243
Wrong. Don't be a pussy and you can pull off cargos.

>>18585595
>proceeds to post a picture of someone not pulling them off
ngmi

>>18585674
the unlaced boots kill it the pants are fine

I wanted to cop these rovic desert camos but they all out of my size 32x30

>>18585689
those would go nicely with my triple white af1 highs

>>18585689
those would go nicely with my triple white af1 highs

>>18585689
eurofags and their skinny gay star raws
dont forget the armani exchange tee and stone island puffer

>>18585693
they only have this color in 32x32 and im 32x30 but i could shorten them

im pulling the trigger, copping these yolo
might cop an extra back up black pair too even at 200$

not trynna look like a jani tho

i dont not a huge fan of the dickies khakis but then again i havent tried them on in ages

nAh bro these rovic pants are like our lululemon, they create an illusion you got conor mcgregor legs

me in my rovic pants

>>18585595
He looks like the maintenance guy who stumbled onto the blue(?!) carpet

>>18585689
Fucking millennials and their tapered pants lmao.

>>18585689
I wouldn't wear these even if they were given to me for free and I was paid to wear them, let alone pay 250 FUCKING DOLLARS
dumbass board just as bad as reddit

>>18585243
if you dilated as much as you seethe you'd be a woman by now.

>>18585697
are those g-raw? I have the dark green ones and the tappered is way better than >>18585113.

>>18585689
I'm not acquainted with "rovic"? Are they known for quality products?

>>18585113
just got the model from OP pic. They look even better than advertised.

>>18585689
>buying clothes from amazon
you should just kill yourself

>>18586153
the rovic 3d cargos are like womens yoga pants magic, making your silhouette look like a sprinter

>>18586174
>not buying clothes from Amazon
>not having cheap basics like Hanes beefy t-shirts and wrangler jeans for $7 and $18, respectively
Honestly, anon, you deserve to be poor if you don't buy nice stuff for no money.

>>18585113
>>18586173
>>18586191

I'm not american and never wore cargo pants. For purely aesthetic purposes which ones are better then the tapered ones or wide leg ones?

>>18586174
Retards like you do realize that Amazon is an e-commerce platform, right? They don't make those clothes. They give a platform and distribution system to clothing manufacturers to sell their clothes directly to the customers. So there's nothing wrong with buying from Amazon, as long as you ensure that you're buying quality products.

>>18586313
Look for ones that have drawstring's at the leg opening.

Versatile, more combinations with footwear.

>>18586173
Bro, those look good. How are people even saying it's too skinny?

>>18585113

why do zoomers think this looks good?

>>18586689
Because they're retarded. Both zoomers and millennials are retarded subhumans who can only think about extremes. Normal people wear relaxed fit cargos/pants because they are not only more practical but also look more naturally aesthetic.

>>18586696 looks like he's gonna fix my cable TV, while >>18586173 looks more like alternative fashion.

>>18586710
Alternative fashion from 2014. Looking like an Antifa terrorist was never cool.

>>18585674
>>18585684
The unlaced boots makes it dope

>>18586726
idk in italy I still see a lot of tapered cuts like those g raw cargos. In fact women like the less relaxed more fit look here. Are you sure american wide pant fashion isn't just a sign people are fatter there and the vast majority buys bigger, baggier stuff sending the whole industry to adapt?

>>18586731
i remember reading an article saying that american online shopping re-ignited the baggy trend because people always bought 1-2 sizes bigger and calculated in that they're probably get fat anyway so a size bigger seemed like a safer bet lol

>>18585113
>aren't supposed
lmao this fucking dumbass thinks there's a "is/isn't supposed to" in fucking fashion

>>18586747
Yes there is, retard. There are rules and principles to everything (even art), especially when it comes to clothes which are practical tools just as much as pieces of art. So in order for them to look good on you, they should be practical, follow certain design and anatomical principles, or else they'll look like some larpy costume and inauthentic. Cargo pants need to be a slightly loose in order for them to be practical, because they are outdoor and workwear clothing. or else they don't make sense.

Cargo pants go in and out of style every 10 years.
The trick is to simply not give a fuck and wear what you like.

>>18585689
Just get NOS military surplus pants. The Saudis had some fantastic desert patterns.

>>18586769
>There are rules and principles to everything (even art)
Wrong.

>>18587323
Yes there are retard. Even Jackson Pollock didn't splatter paint randomly. He made sure to follow principles of framing and composition. Art doesn't exist by itself for its own sake. You make art for people, and there are certain things that appeal to people and put them off. So in order for any piece of art to be effective, the artist needs to keep certain rules and principles in mind. Especially when it comes to fashion, since clothes are also practical items that you wear on your body, and not just some pieces of art you put on a shelf.

>>18584754
I'm fine with these cuties :3