Thread 76249037

why do you hate science based lifting?

it clearly gets you results

i prefer shorty mcshortyson since he looks like he would look good in bed naked

imagine if jeff was 190 cm. would he even lift?

>>76249037 (OP)
Only if you roid. This is your result if you dont roid

>>76249037 (OP)
Is mike israel the most unaesthetic fitness influencer?

>>76249207
Will Tennyson comes close

big legs are mental illness

>>76249193
All 4 of them look like shit though.

Mike and Jeff, the legs are too big for their upper bodies
And the 2 on the right, their upperbodies are too wide for their legs.

Nobody looks proportional. This is a peak physique. See how balanced it is

>>76249174
Of course not 90% of anyone who is someone in bodybuilding is there because they're compensating for being a manlet.

How come these science based lifters always go against what prime arnold said but never look better than him?

>>76249037 (OP)
yeha they're injecting all that science into their ass cheeks

>>76249265
we're never gonna have an era like that again

For someone on unholy amounts of gear, Israetael's arms are absolute shit.

>>76249278
His everything is absolute shit

>>76249239
>this is a peak physique
>looks like a junkie
heh

>>76249037 (OP)
I don't hate it I just think it's silly. They use a words and "studies" to come to the same common sense conclusions that their forefathers came to 50 years ago.

>>76249037 (OP)
>why do you hate science based lifting?
its actually good, just became a meme because most of the people talking about it looked dyel even for natty standards

>>76249037 (OP)
They look like muscular oompa loompas

>>76249037 (OP)
Now put an average height person next to them and lets see how they compare

>>76249037 (OP)
>claim what you are doing is the science
>therefore anyone who disagrees with you disagrees with science
Nipples and Kike should get raped by a pack of joggers.

>>76249199
>losing over 6% bodyfat in 3 months
i don’t think that’s bad

>>76249037 (OP)
My only problem with it is that 90% of it is clickbait bullshit "you're doing _____ exercise wrong!" Or "the top 5 worst exercises for _____ gains" and it shows images of the most common exercises that people do for that muscle group, and then the content ends up contradicting the clickbait title because all these faggots are just chasing engagement.

>time under tension
>Lengthened partials
>Leave reps in reserve

There. I summed up the entirety of modern "science based lifting"

>>76249199
>biceps literally didn't grow at all
What the hell did this guy do for over a year?

>>76250081
A lot of gregging his deucette

>>76249037 (OP)
Natty?

>>76249193
Reg Park was so amazing, as was Reeves

>>76249199
I think he did gain muscle, you just can't see it under the fat

goes to show the importance of cutting

>>76250055
1 year and 3 months

>>76249037 (OP)
>roidbloat
grim

>>76249037 (OP)
>claims natty
>shoulders wider than a tren-blasting roider (albeit with gutter trash genetics)

>>76250081
he followed the exact same routine and diet as a novice that his brother, Jeff Nippard did, as a YouTube experiment

>>76249193
Now show Jeff with a competition physique too

>>76249619
Why is his ass so square

>>76249037 (OP)
Nothing against the idea itself. I don’t like “science based lifters”. One because 100% of them are annoying nerds. Two because I think they are disingenuous when they say they are natty.

Not to say they probably don’t have a good diet and exercise routine locked in. I’m just saying I don’t believe them because it’s the internet and everybody lies. They make their livelyhood by having their bodies always on display for their videos. You don’t think they’d take something to give them an advantage and make their lives a little easier? Not enough to blow up and make it obvious. Just enough to give them an edge to stay lean while preserving muscle while still giving the impression that its because they use “science” that they achieved their physique

That being said, after all these years I still prefer Jeff Fake Weight Cavalier’s videos over this new generation.

>science based
>picture of Mike Jizzraeltel
>Bigger and stronger than Mike Mentzer
>We don’t actually know

Yes dude

>>76249619
>bigger and stronger than mike mentzer

>>76249193
Reeves and Reg are peak aesthetics though Reeves needed more definition. The best of their eras. Arguably peak physiques in terms of aesthetics.

>>76251224
that's a cool look, how did he got so wide

>>76249037 (OP)
>>76249278
>>76249285
Kek nippard is mogging him
Imagine getting mogged by a natty

>>76251722
Damn, Nipp's arms actually have more mass. Epscially those forerms and brachiradialis.

>>76249037 (OP)
>>76249193
>>76249216
why do all those super popular influencers look like ass

>>76250755
Why didnt Jeff share his roids with his brother?

>>76251722
>>76251789
I think only nipples' legs are bit smaller (allthough he didnt stuff his pants all up his ass-crack so its hard to tell) and he seems 1-2% higher in bf
>imagine being a roud tranny only to get mogged by a natty lifter after decades of frauding
Holy kekerino

>>76250755
>>76251902
Jeff's trainees only see sucess with steroids
>from Jeff's own website btw

>>76251710
it's just the suit

>>76249037 (OP)
Look how small isakikes feet are lmao

>>76249193
now post zane

>>76249199
why didnt he tell him to pose normally and not like a fucking spastic or better yet just stand upright
he clearly gained some muscle
also how did his strength develop?

>>76252619
Because then youd see the lack of progress

>>76249193
Nice concrete mixer gut. This is why bodybuilding is a joke and not a real sport. Imagine willingly associating yourself with these roided troglodytes

>>76249619
Israetel's silhouette looks retarded.

>>76252580
Grosse Téte?

>>76252633
There's nothing wrong with having a gut, but you have to own it and let it be what it be instead of trying to pretend that you're a serious bodybuilder, otherwise you end up looking like a literal aging gay porn star.