Thread 76354344

>rode my bike to and from work today, burning over 1000 calories in total
>can now eat as much as I want and still have a calorie deficit

>1000 calories
no you didnt unless you were riding for 4 hours

>>76354366
It was about 2 hours and 20 minutes in total, at an average speed of about 23km/h

>>76354389
>23km/h
This means nothing on an efficient vehicle such as a bike
You did not lose 1k calories in 2 hours biking

>>76354344 (OP)
It's kinda gay though, I'd rather drive my car

>>76354366
I don't know cycling values but running 1 mile is like 100kcal, so 10 miles is 1000kcal which for most people is between 90 to 120 minutes. For cycling, Mentzer said it was less efficient than running at burning kcal so for anon, I'd guess he cycled for 120 to 150 minutes.
>>76354389
WA LA

>>76354389
lmao ok friend
how obese are you?

>>76354773
Bro you cannot compare running, a full body exercise to biking
Biking is casual as fuck, the bike is too efficient in keeping you moving without that much input

>>76354796
Idk bro, I set the treadmill to 18mph and stand next to it and it says I burned 1500 calories. Just get better my dude

>>76354470
>>76354796
>running, a full body exercise
How the fuck is running a full body exercise while cycling isn't??? Running is pure cardio, while cycling actually used muscle strength, especially at high speed and uphill where it even requires back and core strength depending on technique. And yes cycling is more efficient than running, that's why you go FASTER and LONGER distances, retards