Why is this board so anti-science?

>>76364375 (OP)
Statistics is a better science.

>>76364375 (OP)
Modern science is just activism and special interests riding on the back of a legacy built by independently-funded genius IQ Europeans 100 years ago. The idea that the most ancient food group causes modern disease is so dishonest it's like a humiliation ritual to make scientists state the most bizarre lies in order to show their political loyalty.

>plain beef from a healthy animal similar to what your ancestry ate for tens of thousands of years is bad for you
>ultra processed grain slop which also happens to give the best profit margins is good for you
I have a degree in STEM (chemistry) and my opinion is that science is not only inherently gay but arguably also fake

>>76364375 (OP)
>Cancer research UK

>>76364418
This.
In the reality nitrates in processed meats are harmless if consumed with vitamin c or other antioxidants. And guess what, all processed meat by law should contain vitamin c. Even before that it's was just a small increase in a chance of getting one specific cancer. Everything causes some specific kind of cancer. Even green tea can cause a throat cancer.
And for a regular meat is a total bs. Onions, for example, is more carcinogenic than processed meat, yeat there is no media article how bad it is.

>>76364375 (OP)
>Consumption of processed meat has been linked to an 18% increased risk of colorectal cancer for every 50 grams consumed daily.
>Base rate is 40 in 100,000 = 0.04%
>Consume 50g of processed meat every day
>Colon cancer increased to 46 in 100,000 = 0.046%
The absolute horror. Guys, we all need to go vegan NOW. Abandon your toxic masculinity and STOP EATING MEAT. It causes cancer.

>>76364375 (OP)
>(((WHO)))
t. vegan
yes that's right i don't trust them even when they agree wth me

because scientists lie

>>76364375 (OP)
Modern "science" is 95% propaganda. Veganism is a great way to wither away due to lack of micro- and macro-nutrients.