>>76375206>Noob dyels like them because they are easier to balance since the weights in front. NO, FS requires great rack mobility afforded by great lat and thoracic extension. BS is far easier to balance and maintain shoulder stability to hold the bar
>No one with a strong front squat would ever say fs is better. At what?
>Because you have to do backsquats just to drive your front squat up. It does drive FS up, but also doing FS also (surprise, surprise) drives itself up.
>It's why 99% of olympic weighters do back squats majority of the time and why everyone who front squats 250kg has 300kg+ back squat.Not exactly, it's because FS are very fatiguing, can't reliably be done at higher rep ranges like BS can. Depends what training block a WLer will be in on what their FS:BS ratio will look like. And if they're on gear (which lets them do more FS which is more sport-specific). At the end of the day, both BS and FS are accessories for the olympic lifts, which should usually take priority (esp. in peaking phase before a comp).
>>76376905>Most weightlifters do a 1:1 or 2:1 back to front squat ratio although some (Ilya ilyin comes to mind) did almost exclusively front squats for higher specificityIlya, god bless him, was also on metric fuck tonnes of gear.
>Front squats are excellent for pushing up the c&jSo is a strength block with higher BS ratio
For the majority of newbie lifters, BS>FS
FS should only be deployed for WLers, or if there's another sports-specific reason to put up with the mobility demands and fatigue.