what are you doing

I'm shitposting at work instead of doing my job. So I guess I'm getting paid to respond to your garbage thread.
What are you doing?

I can do 1/2/3/4 for reps but am a 27 year old khv. Where do I start?

>/chess/

>>76385720 (OP)
photoshopped image of a porn convention featuring a lesbian I jacked off to relentlessly, vs ripped guy at a festival.

What is that image supposed to convey?

>>76385732
how many reps?

>>76385732
> I can do 1/2/3/4 for reps but am a 27 year old khv.
You're literally me
> Where do I start?
It never began

>>76385736
I will now become a chess master

when they think u glazing but actually yikesing

>>76385720 (OP)
ANCIENT IMAGE

>>76385740
6 million reps

>>76385732
If you want the real answer, hire a dating coach. You are clearly too autsitic to figure it out on your own

>>76385732
Step one is go outside and talk to girls

>>76385732
Be yourself
Talk to girls
Figure it out for yourself
Try hard

It's literally that easy, basically every man in the history of humanity has done it

>>76386349
I've literally had women call security on me for attempting to speak to them. And no I didn't ask them for sex or threaten to rape them or whatever stupid shit I'm sure you're picturing in your head to maintain the false worldview that the world is just and women aren't unreasonably cruel to men they see as beneath them insulting them by daring to think they're worthy of speaking to them.
>oh but that's never happened to me so it must not ever happen to anyone!
Congrats on winning the genetics lottery you piece of shit, don't try to give advice to those of us who didn't because it's not fucking helpful.

>>76386444
>basically every man in the history of humanity has done it
blatantly wrong

>>76385731
same

Laughing at you OP

>>76387981
I thought it was a jew star too but I think it's just an X. If it were the former then the bottom right point of the star would be too long compared to the top right point.

>>76387546
everyone should stop lying to incels and tell them to pull themselves up by their bootstraps. this girlfriend thing, it ain't never gonna happen, so just get comfortable with that

>>76387546
>I'm too genetically ugly
Stop browsing 4chan and any other site that has blackpill content. Don't turn into Elliot Roger.

Ugly guys can definitely get girlfriends. It happens literally all the time.

>>76387546
>had women call security on me for attempting to speak to them
Assuming this isn't bait, give context

Status will ALWAYS mog physique or prettiness. Always. It’s almost pathetic how some of you still foam at the mouth over this face vs. body bullshit as if it ever actually mattered in the grand scheme of things. Since the dawn of human society your rank/standing has crushed everything else beneath it. A chiseled jaw or shredded abs won’t save you if you're a nobody. People are hardwired to kneel to power, not aesthetics, and even a mid-looking fatass with status can still radiate gravity. Meanwhile the prettiest peasant still smells like peasantry.

>>76385736
delete this

>>76389621
meanwhile in reality a wife of a billionaire cheats on her husband with the young handsome looking poorfag gardener. or a lowlife ghetto nobody gets endless female attention simply for looking like pic related

>>76389621
Trvke. Bezos could fuck the woman of any man ITT

>>76389993
you can literally be the richest person on the planet and women will still dump you hard and pick the poor more attractive guy. I mean look at Bill Gates or Elon Musk, two of the richest most influential powerful men still getting dumped by their women.

pic related could have nothing but pocket change in his pants and women would still go crazy about him

>>76389984
>billionaire wife cheats with the gardener" cope
Anecdotal exceptions don’t overturn biological constants. If status didn't dominate, the “gardener” wouldn’t be working 12-hour shifts trimming hedges in silence while the billionaire signs policy-changing contracts over brunch. That kind of outlier doesn’t prove face is super to status, but that boredom exists and rich people get sloppy.

>ghetto Adonis
Newsflash retard: if a guy in the slums is getting attention, it’s either because he radiates local clout (status) in his environment, or because he’s exoticized by girls slumming it for danger-thrills, which they drop like trash the second a real player walks in the room.

>>76390023
You're mistaking a hiccup in loyalty for a collapse in dominance. For all that pretty-boy glow and bone structure you’re drooling over, the guy in the pic would still wait in line at the DMV, still rent, still need a boss, still beg for platform.

>>76390091
status is really not everything. sometimes your indications of fitness are not about money or social dominance and this is particularly true when dating prosocial women who have their own shit together

t. have dated up

>>76385720 (OP)

>>76385739
>featuring a lesbian I jacked off to relentlessly
same anon...

>>76390091
>For all that pretty-boy glow and bone structure you’re drooling over, the guy in the pic would still wait in line at the DMV, still rent, still need a boss, still beg for platform.
The guy in the pic is Henry Cavill.

>>76390406
...and?

>>76390111
Nice trips, but what actually happened to you is she either:
>slummed it temporarily for a thrill or validation boost (common)
>thought she was doing charity work with a “potential project”
or
>mistook your posturing for actual status... until she didn’t

Because here’s the cold fact: women, especially those who “have their own shit together,” are hyper-attuned to status cues, whether they admit it or not. It’s not always money or title, but social gravity (how others treat you, how you move, what orbit you command, etc.). You might not see it as dominance, but her hindbrain does.

>>76390431
it's a very one dimensional view of mate selection that's not borne out by the evidence. there are certainly people for whom status cues are heavily weighted, but there are many modes of mate fitness and by the nature of humans, there is a wide spectrum of what is valued in practice that converges on certain values for certain profiles of people. generally, status in terms of social capital is quite desirable but it need not be head and neck above everyone else and monetary resources are selected for but again it need not be exceptional. mate selection is mostly about being above multiple thresholds which are generally pretty reasonable at a population level and in most subpopulations. the combination of thresholds actually constrains the mate pool quite a bit but not so much as to be prohibitive temporally. for people with greater desirability, generally the constraints are greater and this is still a viable strategy because the pool to select from is larger.

zyzz might've fucked a lot of women, but quantity =/= quality

I don't think i've ever seen him photographed with anyone above a 7

>>76390722
>it’s a very one dimensional view of mate selection that’s not borne out by the evidence.
Sure, if you squint real hard status becomes “one dimension.” In the real world it’s the stage on which all other dimensions perform.

>there are certainly people for whom status cues are heavily weighted, but there are many modes of mate fitness and by the nature of humans, there is a wide spectrum of what is valued in practice that converges on certain values for certain profiles of people.
Nice mental gymnastics.

>generally, status in terms of social capital is quite desirable but it need not be head and neck above everyone else and monetary resources are selected for but again it need not be exceptional.
So… it matters? You're playing semantic shell games here: “status counts, but not really.”

>mate selection is mostly about being above multiple thresholds which are generally pretty reasonable at a population level and in most subpopulations.
Right, thresholds set by… you guessed it, social hierarchy. “Above baseline expectations” is status. Congrats, you just looped back.

>the combination of thresholds actually constrains the mate pool quite a bit but not so much as to be prohibitive temporally.
Cool, so as long as you hit “mediocre-status” benchmarks you’ll find someone. In other words, “playing the status game and winning.”

>for people with greater desirability, generally the constraints are greater and this is still a viable strategy because the pool to select from is larger.
No shit. Status sets the bars. It’s literally the metric that defines desirability tiers.

>>76385720 (OP)
Nice tits. Wow. On that small frame, whew lad.
>>gazes at the dick root longingly

*mogs you*

>>76390776
This is naive thinking. It's thinking like a man. Men respect other men who put in work and go through a transformation, climb the ranks, etc, but it doesn't matter to women

We do gym for muscle strange chick fuck deranged china dick let's do this muscle

>>76390776
i said status is a weighted aspect of mate selection. there was no loop.

so let me make it simple: i enumerated how certain profiles of people tend to converge on different trait preferences (can be culturally conditioned, or a product of personality/pathology/subclinical traits, and so forth).

in regards to status, this means that the typical weight of this selection criterion is not that status or resources be "exceptional," but that they be "enough," in conjunction with other axes of mate selection such as empathy, dominance, physical fitness, cultural values, and so forth.

so what i'm telling you is that your model of mate selection doesn't match the data and it is more threshold based than whatever you're suggesting which is that everything converges on a single axis.

you're conflating mate fitness with status. saying status is everything women want is a category error and strips it of any predictive utility in a scientific sense. this is demonstrable in comparisons of populations, how fitness in one subculture might actually detract status broadly, and so forth. plus the whole threshold model i'm telling you about has been demonstrated repeatedly and in different contexts. e.g., clear the moderate bar of salary and now the decision is made based on looks and humor, not based on marginal differences in paycheck between you and the next guy

>>76388461
what's the point of working out then. T level increase which makes incels even more frustrated.

>>76387546
Haha you're cooked, uggo
>>76391794
Indeed he does