Thread 76448616

>You don't need heavy weight to build muscle
>You can reach your natty limit without touching heavy weights

>>76448616 (OP)
You need heavy weights to build big muscles if you aren't going to take steroids

Im not going to answer your question.
I just came to say I would cum inside that fat chick.
That is all.

>>76448616 (OP)
True and false. You don't have to lift weights you think are heavy, but they have to be heavy relative to someone who doesn't lift.

>>76448669
Wrong, they have to be heavy to you but light for indians

>>76448616 (OP)
>natty limit
Who cares? lol
>blast 500mg test
>look at weights
>blow past nattycuckold limit in 6 months
kek

>>76448616 (OP)
Possibly. Maybe.
i don't think so tho, otherwise kettle bell athletes would be the jackiest.
If their body is your goal, I guess it's fine. If you want more, progressive overload on compound movements is the most bang for your buck a natty can get

>>76448616 (OP)
It turns out this claim is false.

>>76449280
>>>76448616 (OP) (OP)
>It turns out this claim is false.
it is:
>You don't need heavy weight to build muscle
u don't need anything but particular isometric hold positioning, very particular
>You can reach your natty limit without touching heavy weights
can't think of ONE useful thing that u can do with heavy weight actually lol :D
i use 2 few kilo dumbbells, when i use weight at all :D
>>76449345

>>76448616 (OP)
You can isolate everything with 15+ reps, no heavy weights needed