← Home ← Back to /fit/

Thread 76531667

10 posts 8 images /fit/
Anonymous No.76531667 >>76531683 >>76531690 >>76531777 >>76531788
Are you team science lifting or team bro science/intuition lifting?

This is very important
Anonymous No.76531683 >>76531696 >>76531780
>>76531667 (OP)
"bro science" IS the real science based lifting. guys doing trial and error over the course of decades to see what works and what doesn't. meanwhile "science-based lifting" is just some guys reading "research papers" and getting ZERO RESULTS but never going back to bro science even though their own experiences prove that their approach to lifting doesn't work.
Anonymous No.76531685
>science lifting
Anonymous No.76531690
>>76531667 (OP)
Team Lyle
He's about the only fitness sphere person I trust and nuked his career because he didn't want to go along fitness for profit publishing cycle.
Anonymous No.76531696
>>76531683
This is the truth, anecdotes are based and work better than research
Anonymous No.76531701
Rolling for pushups
Anonymous No.76531708
>In a nasal, high pitched voice
>"I am going to prove to you, with science, how to optimally increase muscle mass by this specific range of motion"
>"Also these guys with a roid gut and gyno are natty, and I will prove it with science"

Science based nonsense is dead. Bury it.
Anonymous No.76531777
>>76531667 (OP)
Bro science.

For science based lifting, look at the recent Ls taken by Jeff Nipplard and Kike Israel.
Anonymous No.76531780
>>76531683
/thread
Anonymous No.76531788
>>76531667 (OP)
what has team science ever produced of value?