Thread 76534449

You can't go beyond failure, it's a wall you can never pass.
This applies to every "intensity technique"

Myo reps is unironically very very good.

Is a "myo rep" a new dyel buzzword or something?

>>76534463
They’re just partials.

>>76534649
>They’re just partials.
Not usually. You wait a few seconds after failure so you can do more reps.

>>76534679
Lmao this shit?
https://youtube.com/shorts/vrrsZ_KDpJk?feature=shared

>>76534449 (OP)
>spend more time in the range near failure which is the most influential in muscle development
sounds like a win still

>>76534649
It’s more like rest-pause

>>76534777
>more like
what's the difference?

>>76534463
It's attempt by the "science lifters" to steal and repackage Dante Trudel's methods (because he's team lyle).
Dante calls them pause sets.
What it is:
A set performed to failure, followed by a cycle of partial rest and more reps performed to failure until a rep target is achieved.

The more we know about how hypertrophy works the more valid this method seems for time saving which is why they tried to steal it and rephrase it little to make it seem like it's their idea.

>>76534649
zoomers do partials on everything all the time and as fast as possible and drop the weights with a slam.

>getting tired and waiting a bit before getting the final reps is now a meme

are you guys bored?

>>76534449 (OP)
>making fake graphs instead of lifting heavy
Ngmi, faggot

>>76534793
Traditionally rest pause is longer. 30s maybe? Myo reps is more like waiting until you think you can do another rep, like 5s.

Are 30 rest-pause reps in say, 6 bouts as good as doing 30 reps in 3 sets with longer rests?

>>76534449 (OP)
Of course you can't go beyond failure, that would mean you never failed