Thread 76596145

Science-based lifting is just superior, full stop.
You don't need to do outdated exercises anymore.

My guy got a cameltoe

wow, leaving plenty of reps in reserve

perfection

>>76596164
Tbf that's just an above average sized white clitty

>>76596145 (OP)
This, so much this. As a science-based lifter, I can lift a lot of weight with ease after analyzing and optimizing my form for all the workouts I do. For example, I discovered that I perform optimally when my elbows are tucked at 47.91 degrees close to my torso. For squats, I maintain the same bar path, ensuring it does not deviate more than 0.31% from the previous rep. Any deviation greater than that means it's a partial rep. I also discovered that I have to drink a protein shake within a 17 minutes and 23 seconds anabolic window after working out to maximise muscle growth and repair. If you are not science-based lifting, you are unironically not going to make it.

>>76596180
I thought science based lifting would be min-maxing stuff like this but it's just retarded full body 20 reps workouts with baby weights with gay variants on the machines

you already made this thread. bot

>>76596167
why is his belly so big

>>76596167
Why is this guy fat ?

>>76596218
Ironically, because he took a bunch of drugs / hormones in an attempt to improve his appearance

>>76596218
>>76596226
So he can have a custom row bar that reminds everyone of how hard he gut mogs them

>>76596145 (OP)
if he's gonna be a science-based autist then why this machine? The angle is crap for both delt and pec growth unless you have a female powerlifter-style arch. You're never gonna get a good chest or shoulders with this machine alone. It's only valid use ironically enough is as a finisher following a free weight bench + OHP

>>76596188
the good parts of science based lifting (like a third) are still about that. like sure, doing cable lateral raises set at the right angle feels great and is easier to progress on. but im not taking up two fucking stacks for some bastard y-x-axis cross body raise

>>76596145 (OP)
Science based lifter? More like machine based lifter. I bet this fella couldn't even spot a bench

>>76596145 (OP)
I only follow based soviet science, comrade

>>76596145 (OP)
I barbell bench and can very easily max out the chest press machine in the gym

>>76596180
>t. Magos Biologis

>>76596364
Look at mister galileo here

>>76596378
no don't look at me I look pathetic, I'm strong but gave up my aesthetic card for it.

>>76596388
At some stage in life, strength is what is important because it is useless. What is important is to use that strength.

>>76596218
hgh gut

>>76596145 (OP)
can the backpad angle be adjusted? the plate loaded one by prime is bonkers. 2 physique guys who are going to the olympia this year are always on this machine when i see them

If he were actually science based he would just do cable flies for chest instead of some dogshit chest press machine

>>76596180
> squats
> science-based
JFL NGMI

>>76596188
> 20 reps
holy cardio. that’s like running a marathon or sth

>>76596218
Hgh grew his organs. Probably also has a good bit of visceral fat.

>>76596188
Anyone ever try the old school 20 rep squat workout. Looks like it would fry the legs

>>76596145 (OP)
>can you help me move my apartment?
>sure but only if everything has perfect handholds with adjustable weight and optimized seating
>bro its a fucking desk just grab it somewhere and li-
>sorry bro, i'm all science based you'd never catch me actually squatting or lifting

>>76596238
Fit version of having to order custom made elastic trousers for you massive fat arse

>>76596779
It's will get your everything.
Even if you calculate it right, 20 reps are more endurance based, and you haven't trained for it since when?
Also if you go with 50% of your max, that like going to actual failure at rep 20.
It WILL beat your ass.

>>76596145 (OP)
You jest, but the reason I hate science-based lifting is, ironically, science-based. If you were to submit a college paper (at a university with any degree of self-respect) and you provided a sample size of 8, you'd be told to get the fuck out of the class. Meanwhile, it happens all the god damn time with "science"-based lifting, and is presented as some kind of profound new knowledge. Fuck them and fuck their gimmicks.

>>76596167
How can you tell it's in reverse?

>>76596145 (OP)
>scienced based lifting
>look inside
>45 sets a week to failure is optimal

kek

>>76596911
Tbh, I never heard Jeff cite a study that didn't have at least 36 people in it

>>76596218
Because he’s fat

>>76596145 (OP)
>science-based
>looks dyel

It checks out.

>>76596145 (OP)
>5 years of sciencing for this

>>76597043
an actual study needs a sample size of thousands to ensure a diverse group. if you make a study and only use fat americans, the results are going to be wildly different than using skinny chinese dudes. often times there's no control group and no control over outside factors, and most of the time the result is "might" or "maybe".

lifting was solved years ago.

>3x5-8 on compounds
>3x8-12 for isolations

if that doesn't work you need to eat more

>>76597059
Ain't nobody got the resources to do a study of that scope just for the purpose of hypertrophy research, so you just do it with what you can

>>76596167
Holy shit how fucking insane. Now that he sliced and sucked out all the fat from his lower back (just loose skin from a bulk btw) it’s all just in his massive distended gut.
He might be the first person who looks objectively worse from liposuction, even including all the fat lazy people who gained it all back to look the exact same afterwards.
Bigger and stronger than Mike mentzer btw. Phd in exercise science btw so he knows more than you.

>science based
>"trust the science"
hmm...........

>>76596230
Am i a tranny for using drugs so i can be smarter?

>>76596167
This nigga is a literal cartoon character. Im not a greg fanboy, but ifind gregs videos shitting on mike absolutely hilarious. Mike is an endless meme producing machine

>>76596238
Holy kek, i didnt notice the bar, i was blinded by his goblin appearance

>>76597074
you juat admitted that they aren't reliable on any sense

allowing nerd autist losers into the fitness world is our greatest mistake

>>76597108
I wasn't even defending science based stuff in the first place. Just said that it follows the basic principle I was tought in statistics class, a sample size of 30 is good enough

>>76596145 (OP)
>Science-based lifting is just superior, full stop.
Imagine not following occult-based lifting principles in 2025. Step up your game, you pussy, and start performing blood sacrifices on your rest days.

>>76597233
Blood sausages are good for you, might as well do it.

Just do what feels good

Will sophisticated, modern engineering make up for bad form? Only time can tell.

>>76597246
Can't stress this enough. And do exercises you actually enjoy doing.

>>76596167
I like how monke-like his appearance is here

>>76597059
>muh moving of the goal posts beyond what's actually considered pragmatic in the field
science based fags are fags, but you somehow manage to be an even bigger one

>>76597127
the type of people who've gone to the gym thinking it's the be all end all have always been suckers.

>>76597127
Gotta bring back bullying
>t. got bullied learned to be less of a dweeb