>>76597100 (OP) >faggots still falling for obvious ragebait in the year 2025
here's a pro gamer tip, if someone has an opinion that is as close to objectively dumb as possible, just ignore them, they're either retarded or they're ragebaiting, in both cases it's best to ignore.
>>76597100 (OP) >some woman (or, in all likelihood, a man pretending to be a woman on the internet) says stupid/outrageous shit >it gets reposted >it gets reposted again >and again, and again, and on, and on >people fall for it every time
It's like there's really not much of a difference between 4chan regulars and facebook boomers.
>>76597496
No way in hell that's 35%, what are you on about. 35% on men is morbidly obese and not possible to have your chest stick out more than your gut.
>>76597578 >It's a bunch of fake muscle.
Not, quite, people maintain quite a bit of the strength post cycle. Dedicated roidtroons on trt for life don't want you to know this.
>>76597100 (OP)
that is definitely not an off season pro bodybuilder's body. if he is, then he must be an amateur who enters just to stand on the side and watch the top guys.
You guys are in dire need of a girl math lesson. >wow that's a dad bod
You read this as "that's the body of a typical man", because it's the straight forward logical conclusion to draw from the information provided. This statement is obviously false when we start from that pretense. >wow that's a dad bod
What they actually mean is "wow that's the body of someone I could imagine to have my babies with because he looks strong and reliable to protect me and my kids".
The statistical distribution of fathers and their physiques in observable reality did not enter the woman's mind for an instant. To her they might as well not exist.
