>>76602618
i think a huge thing that a lot of people/chuds get wrong about female sexual selection is they think that it's some kind of evolutionary error checking system meant to drive the species towards genetic perfection or something when it's not that at all. it's not logical, it's not coherent or consistent, it doesn't even make "sense" from an evolutionary perspective half the time, etc. Blackpillers are just as much as midwits because they think something something social status pretty boy healthy genetics blahblah but they're also wrong, because women generally don't sexually select for any real measure of "genetic fitness" beyond generally not being into fat or disfigured guys, and they can select for objectively poor genes and do it all the time as long as some vague, fluid, constantly shifting criteria of "cute" is met, but no one can really nail down what that is. there's some other component in evolutionary science that everyone is missing, at least in this modern social context.
in any case, men have gotta stop believing that what females appear to desire means anything, it probably doesn't, and acting like "what makes women want to reproduce" is the most important question in existence is what got us all into this mess.
