>>76705186
>>76705042
They enjoy them aesthetically, but not a direct visual turn on.
>>76705525
Kinda this.
>>76705804
This.
>>76705874
This is horseshit. Plenty of men are seen as visually pleasing in western society and always have been, there is no short supply of topless men in films or adverts if buff celebrities.
If what you said were true, then why wouldn't the same apply to gay men?
Gay men the world over flock to bath houses, have clandestine sex, will steal a man's underwear to sniff just like a straight man might do for a woman, they will masturbate to the visual image of men, and yet women don't because of you 'culture' hypothesis?
The Japanese women in gaymen are actually into gay romance, where they sexualise men in a feminine way they can relate to.
I have a trans-gf, she was (or is) a gay man and faps to men. Her tiktok, Instagram and twitter is covered in hunky men, coombait and actual gayporn.
Not a SINGLE ONE of my ex-gf's who were actual women, ever did this, in fact they all watched lesbian porn which is one of the most popular categories with women.
Men's and women's sexualities are different on a biological level, and we see similar exhibited in other mammals, whereby males will sniff a females rear and be visually driven to constantly try and fuck, whereas females pick and choose when they are in season and based upon who the strongest is, rather than just trying to get fucked by whoever is available.