>>76707752
It's not that there's a big difference between natural sugar and added sugar per se, it's all the other junk that comes with foods with added sugar. But you could say the same about fatty food like takeaway food, and people do rightly say it about that food, but it's not the fat or the sugar, it's the fact of it being shitty food.
You're giving the sugar=bad crowd too much respect by - well first by responding at all to them, secondly by this kind of admission that added sugar is bad. No it's not. Artificial food full of calories is bad, period. You could eat almost 100% sugars in your diet (fruit) and you would lose weight and feel great - source, have done it. The main problem with being like that "fruitarian" is it's not exactly good for gaining muscle. But you can certainly do it if you only care about energy. Here's an elite endurance athlete and all he eats is fruit:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KE5Z1gKiD1s
the only reason more people aren't fruitarian is because guys especially like muscle rather than being rakes. If I wanted to be as skinny as possible I would only eat fruit, ie. mainly sugar, ie. the EXACT opposite of what they say would happen. But if I drank some soda it wouldn't hurt my diet much or at all.
So how can so many millions of people all be wrong? How can all the """"science"""" about sugar being bad be wrong? Because they are crazy people, crazy, crazy and retarded, they really are. It's generally all fat people who have been driven crazy by trying to stay away from food and they get these ideas and this culty attitude about it. Humans have been full of crazy beliefs and superstitions throughout history and ketards are one of these groups today. They were crazy yesterday and will be crazy tomorrow, no need to dignify their nonsense by saying natural sugar is different or anything like that.
