call it gnu+linux+systemd

>>105560588 (OP)
A thread died for this

>>105560616
you're welcome

>be Stallman
>work your ass off to make an open-source operating system free for everyone
>some asshat writes the kernel just before you finish writing the OS
>the entire project is named after the kernel and you get no credit

Can you imagine the humiliation?

>>105560588 (OP)
>call it gnu+linux+systemd+sudo rust

fixed

>>105560588 (OP)
but I don't use systemd on any of my systems

zsh: command not found: systemctl

>>105561922
haha this nigga posting from terminal with no GUI or some shit hahaha he doesn't even have systemd, all point and laugh

>>105561844
It's his own fault for using a stupid recursive acronym instead of a normal sounding name for his OS.

>>105561844
Hurd is based on Mach. GNU committing to their original plans for a kernel would have been far more humiliating.

>>105560588 (OP)
+kde

>>105561844
>open-source operating system
What exactly makes GNU an operating system on its own? It's entirely possible to use Linux without GNU (see Alpine).

>>105560588 (OP)
Its not very catchy. "Windows" "Apple" are things, real words, and follow a cadence of number of syllables. "GNU" "systemD" or making a correct acronym "GLS" or "LGS" or "SLG" are all unpronounceable jargon. Real people do not like that. Only "Linux" is the closes intelligible word of the bunch.

>>105562123
It's also possible to use GNU without Linux

What About Other Kernels?

Stallman's point becomes even clearer when you consider that GNU works with kernels other than Linux, like:

GNU Hurd (GNU’s own kernel)

FreeBSD kernel (in Debian GNU/kFreeBSD)

This proves that the userland can be used independently of the Linux kernel, reinforcing that “GNU” is more than just a set of tools glued to Linux.

>>105562187
The point is that your don't have to rely on the GNU mental illness.

>>105562187
Debain has a hurd image too.
https://www.debian.org/ports/hurd/hurd-cd

>>105562226
>GNU mental illness
>GNU mental illness
You probably use amazing GNU tools like gcc and nano every day and take it for granted. Stallman fought a war for your freedom and this is how you thank him?

>>105562530
>gcc
lol
>nano
LMAO

>>105561844
>be Stallman
Yes, be someone that everyone on /g/ knows about.
>work your ass off to make an open-source operating system free for everyone
Sounds like a good goal.
>some asshat writes the kernel just before you finish writing the OS
This is a bad faith statement. HURD was nowhere near being finished when Linux was released.
>>the entire project is named after the kernel and you get no credit
Why do you know the name Stallman if that's the case? Also if his goal was for there to be an open-sourse OS free for everyone, and not fame, then the goal was achieved far sooner than if the world had to wait on Georgie R. R. Stallman to finish it.
Sounds like Stallman's goal wasn't noble or pure but rather a desire to be a world famous technohippie. He still got that fame but apparently not at the level desired. The stated goal of a FOSS OS however was achieved beyond anyone's wildest dreams. And you're still butthurt for some reason.

>>105562609
gcc is the best compiler possible for the best programming language possible

>>105562661
rms himself in the thread

>>105562530
GCC is garbage and comes with a standard library that's pozzed by the license (rendering it less free for the developers than MSVC), and nano is absolute shit and micro is better.
I would love to see a viable GCC replacement so Linux could finally be free.

>>105562916
it works for me and i have no problems using it
you sound buttmad

>>105562916
micro sucks dick, nano is perfect, reminds me of edit

>>105562975
GNU retardation is the reason why my Linux systems are mainly Docker+Linux

>>105563017
imagine being this angry because a program is free

>>105561863
Ganoo plus Loonix plus SissyD times Gayland ximes Rust pseudo divided by footfaggery
Truly LGBTQCIA+-/%$&QWERTY inclusive

>>105563025
MIT and BSD are free, GNU is not. I can accept GPLv2 as a niche but definitely not suitable for most free software in 2k25. Anything newer than GPLv2 is literally a result of severe schizophrenia.

>>105563025
Imagine being so clueless that you actually have no idea what he's even talking about. GNU is a cancer that we're stuck with at this point.

>>105562171
>GLS SLG LGS
Glass Slag Legs or as I have taken to calling it, ur mom

>>105563044
NOOOOOOO FREEDUM MEANS I GET DEADHAND CONTROL OVER IT FOREVER!

>>105563064
No actually freedom is when anybody can do whatever they want with it, forever. Most free software is like that in 2k25, which is pretty cool. I get to use a bunch of cool shit.

>>105563085
I was agreeing with you retard.

>>105562530
>Stallman fought a war for your freedom and this is how you thank him?
holy fuck you sound like a pozzed nigger

>>105563140
I see. I'm just so used to freetards seething unironically I automatically treat absurdity in this topic as someone's real opinion.

>>105563044
>MIT and BSD are free
Free to be corporate cuckslaves.
>But sitting there, quietly powering masses of the internet, without saying boo to a goose, is FreeBSD. And the companies using it? They’re not talking about it. Why? Because they don’t have to. The simple fact that dawned on me is FreeBSD’s gift to us all, yet Achilles heel to itself, is its license.
>Unlike the GPL, which requires you to share derivative works, the BSD license doesn’t. You can take FreeBSD code, build on it, and never give anything back. This makes it a great foundation for products — but it also means there’s little reason for companies to return their contributions.
https://freebsdfoundation.org/blog/the-report-of-my-death-was-an-exaggeration/

>>105563064
unironically yes

>>105560588 (OP)
systemd?

>>105561863
>+sudo rust
you don't need that. systemd has run0

>>105560588 (OP)
uh actually its GNU+linux+wayland+systemd sweaty.

>>105560588 (OP)
>>105560616
>>105560644
Sexy rust sisters!!