How do we stop this?

Stop what?

>>105603561 (OP)
>>>/pol/

>>105603561 (OP)
the only way to stop it is violence unfortunately, which means that whoever stops it isnt going to be alive to benefit, which also means that the people who do it would need to believe they are saving something worthwhile.

>>105603584
True. Which also means
>it's fucking over

at least You are not speaking Russian)))

>>105603567
>>105603583
glowniggers tongue my anus

>>105603561 (OP)
you just have to vote harder anon. Daily remainder that 90% of /g/ sucked off big tech in chink flu times. Its not going to get better.

>>105603561 (OP)
no one will ever explain what this is, only complain about it

>>105604163
>no one will ever explain what this is, only complain about it
Palantir just a big government contract to create "digital social scores" for every American. They will combine every bit of data the government has on you.
>credit cards/loans/bank info
>internet usage
>criminal records
>education records
>medical records
One of the most dystopian things that could ever happen.

>>105603561 (OP)
I don't get it. Reddit told me he's the good guy.

You don't. You voted for this, and now you spread those ass cheeks wide open and take it.

>>105604198
I think everyone else would enjoy this happening to Americans if it doesn't affect them in any way. Unfortunately everything is connected nowadays.

>>105604188
No they didn't.
https://www.reddit.com/r/unitedkingdom/comments/1k52umy/starmer_welcomes_real_clarity_from_supreme_court/
Literally never seen a redditor say anything positive about Starmer, ever. Especially after his transgender fiasco (he said they are not women)

>>105604179
It's not like that has already happened with your self participation in society.
>It did.

>>105603561 (OP)
>How do we stop this?

>>105603561 (OP)
>US is already a surveillance state
>but as soon as it starts affecting illegals, it's a problem

>>105603561 (OP)
>How do we stop this?
International competition. Up the stakes. Make your enemies irrelevant.

I got a knock on the door from two federal agencies for proposing we write malware that sits on normalfag devices and spams posts filled with keywords the glow niggers search for to random websites and burning accounts. It would overwhelm their systems with so many false positives that it would make them useless.

>noooooo stop using 3rd party software!
>the government should write its own software!
lol

do leftoids really?

>>105604311
>hurr durr we already have patriot act
>might as well have an actual social credit system while seething at China

>>105604374
>the US is going to have a social credit system in 2 weeks!

>>105604356
Yes, unironically. I would rather have a bumbling and incompetent Big Brother than a psychopathic and efficient one.

>>105604243
>It's not like that has already happened with your self participation in society.
Wrong, faggot. Numerous government agencies have that info, but it's just sitting there until it's needed to be used and not linked too much.
With this shit a PRIVATE COMPANY will have access to all the data the government has on you and will be able to mold it however they want to give you some kind of "score" that fits their criteria.

>>105604356
It's not the software, it's the data they are being given and what they want to do with it.

>>105604356
>he defends the police state
Typical "small gubmint" lolbertardian.

>>105604288
It's 2025 and you still trust the government?

>>105604425
It's 2025 and you still trust the government?

>>105604482
>>105604498
says the guy defending the government giving shitloads of data to the president's friend. Lolberts, everyone!

>>105604498
Government is big and lazy and won't bother to sell unique print of your anus for a pittance. Governments prefer power over small profits, meanwhile corpos would squeeze every fraction of a cent from their assets to make a profit.

>>105604521
what I said was the government still had your data, but you argued that it's bad for businesses to collect your data.
Read your own posts because that is what you said because you are unable to read mine.

>>105604578
>it's bad for businesses to collect your data
It is, yes. Your point?

>>105604498
>It's 2025 and you still trust the government?
Of course not, but there's no avoiding them having your data. But them having it is essentially worthless as they do nothing with it. Giving it all to some (((corporation))) to judge you and create a score that's applied to you is fucking insane.

>>105604356
>leftoids

at least You are not speaking Russian))))

>>105603561 (OP)
Protect Boeing/Lockheed from bankruptcy?

>>105603561 (OP)
You know exactly how to stop it.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/czxyx04dv1wo

>>105606717
yeah I remember how the US healthcare system was fixed after this
oh wait

>>105603561 (OP)
Boycott da joos products like Intellaviv devices.

>>105603561 (OP)
There is nothing you can do about it. In all likelihood something similar has already been instated; if they keep xKeyscore unknown to the public why would they publicise this retarded social points BS.

>>105607750
>xkeyscore
wayland port when

>>105608212
Kek

>>105603561 (OP)
Starmer is pathetically desperate chasing AI money, when our energy costs are probably why no serious AI labs will be built in the UK.
Then again I'm sure he'll do something like offer them "free" energy and it turns out we're all subsidising it as our bills go up. The government has totally bought into the AI sauce.

>>105608275
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oBAHGyPLFbs

https://prepare.campaign.gov.uk/be-informed-about-hazards/power-cuts/

>>105603584
Frodo had a hard life...

>>105604131
Voting harder doesn't stop Palantir in the UK example at all. Despite Starmer being shown at their offices they were inducted into the NHS under Boris Johnson's cabinet in 2020 and were lobbying since 2019..
Which means that the minister at the time responsible for this was Jeremy Hunt who had courted them first, who had been secretary of state for health since 2012, he's the one who wanted to privatise the NHS desperately, the most hated man in Britain for a while, beyond even the chancellor through austerity.
Matt Hancock or the man who stands next to giant signs with his name allowing him to be photographed with the word cock and an arrow pointed to his head, took over in 2018 and remained through the COVID & Johnson era, he was the one who signed the initial contracts for Palantir to be involved with NHS England.

Now. It gets a bit rocky here because while May campaigned on Strong & Stable which became a meme, and you may be looking at her cabinet and thinking oh that is a bit stable. Our next health minister is Sajid Javid, he had a go at it for a year, then Steve Barclay gave it a go for 3 months, Therese Coffey took some busy time out of being Work & Pensions minister to give it a month and a bit under Lettuce Liz, Barclay came back, desperate for more under Sunak, realised he didn't actually like the job, stayed a month. Victoria Atkins, 9 months! enough to have a sprog.

Now our current health minister is someone who chomps at the bit for privatisation more than Hunt the Cunt. An insidious little neoliberal gay fella named Wes Streeting.
Here, voting doesn't work because at the time, that 2017 vote, was based on securing a Brexit deal. The 2019 vote that allowed the clown car to run the NHS, based on securing a Brexit deal.
Voting a little harder for Corbyn in those 2 elections /could/ have worked maybe, yeah, but Streeting was inevitable as Starmer the zionist was always going to stab Corbyn in the face.

>>105608410
not watching but the title makes no sense, miliband hates nuclear

>>105604212
>Literally never seen a redditor say anything positive about Starmer, ever. Especially after his transgender fiasco (he said they are not women)
Not that anon, there's a few of them, but the UK & Ukpolitics subs being moderated by a certain group means it's a little harder to see but the Starmerites do exist, or did exist at least in 2020 > 2024.
A redditor Starmerite generally exists on the premise of "he's not that bad" and "he'll get better once he's in office", one of those groups did dry up, I'll leave you to guess that bombshell (a bit like Palantir guessing if that kids hospital contains a functioning military base or nuclear weapon development lab).

The rousing defence of Starmer when it appears is from "centrists" who appeal to common sense, talk about how he's a serious man & technocrat and extol the virtues of Rachel Reeves as chancellor.
The other half are zionists and thanks to reddit being a social media platform you can easily tell they're Jewish because their post history usually only ever comments on zionism related issues, these people were the ones lobbying for Starmer to stick the knife into Corbyn's back and lose votes.

In a general sense, your statement is true in that so far as support for Starmer on reddit, there's not much, you really have to just be a conservative voter to really love his policies. And if you're a conservative voter, the conservatives ha- well they don't have those policies currently but reform do, so you'll pick them and buy into the news slagging him off constantly so it's a bit of a lost cause really.

>>105606717
Is there a Thai boy supple enough to get both of them?

>>105608583
stay in the dark then

>>105608275
>Starmer is pathetically desperate chasing AI money, when our energy costs are probably why no serious AI labs will be built in the UK.
Right, funny because just 2 days ago the complaint was with Peter Kyle meeting with tech firms, Anthropic & Meta to get them set up here along with Deep Mind and energy costs and deals were all there in the documents that are obtainable through FOI.
Here's what's going to happen in terms of energy contracts and deals, they will be given a grant that will offset their use and Miliband or Kyle will try to get them to put it in the North where they can benefit from wind farms; because currently we disconnect our wind farms in Scotland because the National Grid can't handle it while they burn gas down in London, which is the element keeping costs high.
Miliband ha the desire for regional pricing (which would benefit big tech setting up in Scotland) but I don't believe he's tried to decouple gas from the general unit costs that consumers & business pay yet.

>Then again I'm sure he'll do something like offer them "free" energy and it turns out we're all subsidising it as our bills go up. The government has totally bought into the AI sauce.
I mean, that's a fairly inexpensive issue for the UK taxpayer when the biggest issue is strike pricing and the price of gas & failed suppliers pushing your bills up on a daily basis.
The price of gas used as the general unit will cost you more in a year than it would to pay their bills outright..

>>105608583
Miliband has no say in the matter, they're building and it's coming out of his green budget whether he likes it or not.
That man exists to be trod upon and vilified by the press like gbeebies above. Never should have bought that bacon roll...

>>105608651
It's worth noting that in terms of setting big tech up in Scotland to benefit from clean energy, they're setting up a supercomputer in UoE
https://www.ed.ac.uk/news/university-set-to-host-ps750m-national-supercomputer
This has went back and forth a bit, with it coming out of the budget when Labour took over but Reeves has added it back in now.

News like this gets less coverage than your pieces trying to stir up hate for your fellow man and people who have more in common with you than Starmer & government cronies. Nobody wants to read a piece about tech investment in the UK or clean energy being used. There is however a larger trend of investment in Edinburgh over the last decade, trying to position it as some sort of business meets tech hub, the infrastructure isn't entirely pushed to breaking point and you can expand out eastwards towards East Lothian and still reap the benefits as population density drops significantly from the city.

This is one of the passive benefits we've seen from upgrading out communications network over the last decade and moving away from PSTN.

>>105604521
>authoritarian practices
>libertarianism
What

>>105604179
No one will explain because its all lies and one big nothingburger.