AI users have lower brain activity and struggle to perform tasks without AI

I wonder if using python does the same

>>105623687 (OP)
and smartphones didnt do the same thing?
kek
it's probably the opposite too but it all depends on knowing how to prompt.
for example you could get it to explain a highschool subject concept to you in the style of a zoomer. if you asked it to.
the zoomer is actually going to read the content if it appeals to him, and maybe he can understand it better if the LLM can use an allegory that relates back to his generation/peer group.
that's a good teaching tool, if it actually gets him learning.
but it's not used like that. it's demonized, and people are emotional. skill issue, pebkac.

This just in: "Experts" say that calculator users have lower brain activity than "brain users" who calculate calculus by hand.

That's how stupid AI deniers sound desu.

>bot spacing

They're not wrong. This is the average retard using AI.

>>105623749
>"Experts" say that calculator users have lower brain activity than "brain users" who calculate calculus by hand.
How often are people doing calculus, retard? And yes I would say that calculators have made people less math proficient. Now with AI they will be less life proficient.

>>105623687 (OP)
@grok is this true?

>>105624402
You just know that he is bald and has a beard

>AI has been the new big tech for the last 2 years
>supposedly rising in usage
>no one on /g/ ever talks about it
WIndows XP literally gets more threads and posts than AI. That should say it all. Most people aren't "using" AI. AI pics are just showing up in their Facebook feed and Google Gemini is now the first thing that pops up when you ask a question.

>>105623687 (OP)
For research i dont see a problem but work coding or art it's definitely true.

>>105624651
>coding
maybe if you depend on it to do everything for you, which is easy to fall into.
but as far as learning, its still a great tool ie;
"how can i do this function in this language"
depending on how specific the function is, you'd have a hard time finding a good enough tutorial or example to replicate. while the llm is most likely producing working code from multiple sources of people who just never bothered or had the time to write about their implementations.

a lot of people complain about tutorials too, how theres nothing "intermediate" and its mostly aimed at beginners or genius architect researchers. this creates a middle ground for that.

>>105624522
The way we use AI is different from how normies with heavily filtered products use it

>relying on a machine that can "answer" any question you have instead of searching for the information yourself makes you intellectually lazy
crazy research

>>105624522
All free tools are completely useless for some tasks like making Minecraft mods/datapacks targetting a specific version.

>>105623687 (OP)
>by hampering the development of critical thinking, memory and language skills
As usual, a certified skill issue. AI is a tool and like any other tool using it properly requires and implies a minimum baseline competence. If you've been raised by an ipad instead of your parents and got socialised by discord and instagram it isn't AI that's making you dumber, the truth is for you the game wasn't even rigged from the start, it was over before you were born.

>>105623687 (OP)
>researchers find dicks in their ass
I love discussing my ultra-niche interests with chatgpt and learning new things in the process. I've never met a human being who cares about any the things I'm passionate about, so In-depth conversation with an entity that is well-versed in millions of obscure subjects has been fantastic for my brain.

>>105623687 (OP)
just grab a burger and stop listening to these nerds
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=I1EOWNsbnLw

>>105623687 (OP)
>people who can do long division in their head hate calculators

>people who can cut down trees with an axe hate chainsaws

>people who can walk 100 miles hate cars

Its just another tool that makes mundane tasks easier. Those that excel at mundane obsolete task cry about their lost advantage. A tale as old as time.

>>105623687 (OP)
>>105624412

>>105624824
You're a fucking faggot. Having AI summarize a book and spit out an essay is hurting your ability to learn, comprehend, and problem solve.

>>105624902
>I love discussing my ultra-niche interests with chatgpt
Literally >>105624402

>>105624763
>The way we use AI is different from how normies with heavily filtered products use it
You have dumb dumbs like this on /g/ having conversations with ChatGPT. >>105624902
/g/ and normies aren't much different anymore.

>>105624522
>>no one on /g/ ever talks about it
anon...more than half of the /g/ is posted by AI

>researchers """say"""
>"""A""" study

Okay post the article? Some people were lobotomites before chatgpt. Are we sure that it isn't just enabling them?

>>105625051
Are you implying theres an issue here? What might it be?

>>105625105
You're having a fucking discussion with an AI chatbot like some fucking bleddit retard. Are you going to donate to some AI girlfriend soon like a fucking simp?

>>105625097
>anon...more than half of the /g/ is posted by AI
But they aren't talking about AI.

I talk to LLMs about politics.
They're not overly sensitive to critiques of neoliberalism which means they're better than the average everyman who has spent the last 45-50 years worshipping it.

Philosophy, politics, medical issues are where it shines.

>>105625146
the darkest place is under the candlestick

>>105623693
Dynamically typed languages attract brainlets and also cause their limited cognitive abilities to rapidly decline. After a year or two they're basically completely retarded and unable to function in a civilized society.

>>105623687 (OP)
Doubt.
AI is so new I can't see it having much effect yet.
My hypothesis: dumb people are more likely to use AI than smart people.

>>105623687 (OP)
wet streets cause rain o algo

>>105624788
Search engine results are so piss poor, and also flooded by AI you're basically just wasting time by researching on the web now.

Fox News said voting for Kamala Harris turns you into a woman.

How could you possibly determine a causal direction here? Maybe stupid people use AI more, rather than AI making people stupid.
>in b4 someone tries to one-up me with "it's both"

>>105623687 (OP)
Grok, write my research for me.