Why is the Rust syntax so god awful If youโre going to make a better language and supposedly something to replace C and C++ why are you saying use this with worse syntax
Itโs like the language designers forgot you read and write it I thought the idea was great then I saw the syntax and thought it was some sort of joke
Yeah thanks but no thanks fix that and maybe people will care Just look at it and tell me you want to sit there writing and reading it for a job all day
>>105629683 Your complaint is common with people who never spend any time trying to understand a new language. Can you point to something specific and how you would solve it in a better way?
>>105629700 I have had to learn things extremely quickly for work in the past from languages and frameworks and etc etc etc
Itโs not a me problem All you have to do is look at it and idgaf if you canโt figure out how to express a concept without using shit syntax Usually language designers focus on that stuff so donโt push it on other peoples backs
Show any graybeard this shit they will laugh I am sure But they already pulled the eject handle and are retired so whelp guess youโre fucked
>>105629747 ... ye thought so. When so many people have no problem with this and you got filtered, it is definitely a you problem. Especially seeing how can't point to something you would improve with your vibe based opinion.
In Hare, the size of such executable is 250KB, and that also includes the runtime, since Hare produces static executables (zero ldd dependencies) and does not use glibc I think that this is pretty good!
>>105629844 For embedded systems you don't use the stdlib nor do you use runtime. In that case, Rust's executables are just as large as C's, which is a couple of bytes.
>>105629905 got the rust version to 4kB. there's probably more one can do but i'm not interested in this bait thread anymore, clearly the OP was just being retarded with a debug build.
>>105627954 (OP) We were briefly considering using Rust for our performance critical worker services. However, it turned out the binary was a few MEGABYTES in size. Oh no. Oh my god, no. So we went for C with Musl instead. All the developers stood up and applauded for dozens of minutes.
>>105629804 Have to go through a few hoops to make this work, but 19kb.
Anonymous
6/18/2025, 2:41:55 PM No.105630435
>>105630001 True, lets see some actual usecases >At only 20 KB, Tinba is much smaller than any other known Trojan This is a fully functional man in the browser trojan built from the Zeus malware which was mostly C and C++