owari da..

>>105641881 (OP)
>tfw insulted by CrystalDisk

>>105641881 (OP)
You've been a Bad Boy

Anime website

>>105641881 (OP)
>wd10jmvw

Looks old, 10 years old drive?

>>105641881 (OP)
>spinning rust in 2025
Yeah you deserve that happening to you.

>>105641881 (OP)
BACKUP EVERYTHING NOW!

>>105641881 (OP)
WDTODDLERS BTFO

>not using shizuku edition
ngmi

>>105641881 (OP)
>>105642792
If it stops copying at some point use the freezer trick. I was afraid to take the HDD out so I just cooled the laptop itself with bags of frozen veggies. That was my last HDD.

>>105641881 (OP)
What are the bad values here?
What do they mean?

>>105643562
nobody knows man
HDD makers make it clear as mud

>>105643562
Bad is when "worst" is lower than "threshold".
But in real use any non-zero number of reallocations means the drive should be immediately disposed of, the rest does not matter.

>>105643696
Retard.
It's not even seagate with its offser/compression of raw values. Everything is plainly listed and clearly named here.

>>105641881 (OP)
Surely you have redundancy left in your ZFS array? Just replace the disk and let it resilver, no biggie.

>>105642601
No one asked, faggot.

>>105643892
>But in real use any non-zero number of reallocations means the drive should be immediately disposed of
Isn't this bit holocaust.

>>105643892
>Bad is when "worst" is lower than "threshold".
shouldn't this mean things are still good?

>>105645671
reallocated sectros is at 133 out of 140
it's a countdown that starts at 200 and decreases with every unspecified amount of actual lost sectors
manufacturers consider some unspecified amount of dead sectors "fine enough" and only throw warnings at sub-140

That's what you get from buying wd-blue, the bottom of the barrel crap from wester digital.

Thankfully my wd red is still going strong.

>>105645772
What about this
Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 099 099 010

>>105645818
it's above zero so it might as well be already dead, but manufacturer thinks it's not dead enough yet.

>>105645797
Those 8 read errors mean you lost up to 32kB of data. Have fun finding out WHERE.

>>105645843
I get brand new drives with reallocated sector count being non zero out of the box

>>105646697
that's not what read error RATE means

Surprised this one is still kicking

>>105646844
>powered on for 13 years
damn

>>105646796
Caviar WD drives record sector read hard errors instead of rate. The number is saved and increments forever.

>>105646844
>pending
You just need to zero it out.

>>105646994
That only delays the inevitable.

>>105647023
No that reveals the truth.

This is ~14 years old and the majority of its life was spent in an externally attached enclosure. I think a lot of you people bang on your desk or treat your hardware like a step child.

>>105647146
>7200 rpm
There you go

>>105647146
>seagate
>decimal

>>105646994
Like with dban or similar?

wd is a shit brand

>>105641881 (OP)
this happened to me when i fragmented my sdd to make it faster

>>105648676

Was in active use at some point, now my redundancy-not-backup drive. Another one is 306/52684 with no issues.
At this point I imagine it might be safer to just keep these than buy an identical new one, heard WD's quality has gone to shit.

I don't even know how to read this

>>105649279
>Bad Block Count value at 0
Not ideal

>>105648640
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdx bs=8M

>>105648676
>>105648824
What am I looking here?

>>105646844
those samsung drives were beasts, I remember 120gb PATA one tried click of death on me once, but after few tries decided not to.
Currently oldest drive in use in my current system is WD Green 1TB with 52500+ hours, it is quite and cold too. Good for cold storage.

>>105647146
nice temps

>>105649664
Thank you. I try to keep it cool since I rarely turn them off. The hot one is the Kingston NVMe.

>>105641881 (OP)
Is this software better than gSmartControl in anything except le big colorful status label?

>crystal disk info
Where are my linux bros?