>How i sleep knowing there is a literal 'p thread on /b/ and trannitors are doing jackshit with it

Is this the thread?

proofs?

>>105647656
new 4chan leaks:
magnet:?xt=urn:btih:f40057ff0bfa7ec858615123f8087e8d6d9df726&dn=PTHC+2016&tr=udp://tracker.openbittorrent.com:80&tr=udp://tracker.opentrackr.org:1337/announce

its really fucking funny that my posts advertising leto's domain got deleted while the literal bot threads still stay up

>>105647676
>PTHC
MOOOOOOOOODS

>>105647699
>posts advertising child porn
jannies are keeping it up until they can save the 'p

thanks for the 'p

>>105647635 (OP)
>trannitors are doing jackshit with it
trannitors are jacking to it

>>105647749
based?

>>105647766
>moderators
>based
retard alert

>>105647711
>>105647766

>>105647779
also >>105647777

>>105647699
like they even deleted the single jak in this thread but not the p magnet like wtf they doing kek

>>105647676
>20 minutes ago
based pro-map jannies

>>105647790
>wtf they doing kek
see >>105647721 and >>105647749

>>105647790
does leto secretly have some sort of cabal in the mods or jannies in 4chan o algo

>>105647676
I'm curious to find out what this is, but I also don't feel like going to prison

>>105647810
Mods and jannies have always been pedophile enablers. Most mods don't even give 'p spammers permabans.

>>105647887
okay but why bother deleting the soijaks then
they just show that they are aware of whats happening here and dont have the plausible deniability of ignorance anymore

>>105647887
proofs?

>>105647906
honestly i think they are just retarded

>>105647906
the only thing else i can come up with is that /lgbt/ is a lot more special to the mods than most people realise and its raid is the real reason for qa ban

that would also somewhat explain the april leaks of the jannies being rogue powertrippers that are also actual faggots in the literal sense

>>105647939
lefties and sjws and shit i mean

>>105647887
/lgbt/ is dead board who cares about it at this point? it was already raided this year and nobody cared.

>>105647950
when was that?

>>105647906
Pedos (mods) hate 'jaks because they're sharty related. Occasionally they respond by posting 'p.

>>105647912
The bans page system occasionally publishes child porn mods gave temp bans for (pure mod incompetence). Earlier this week they removed post details from /bans because a month earlier the system published a bunch of 'p after /g/'s mod gave a 'p spammer mere 3-day bans for spamming on each IP. This isn't even the fist time /bans had 'p but now they decided to prevent users from seeing it.

>>105647966
Are mods being this blatant a relatively recent thing? If not, how long back does it go?

>>105647982
being pedos or whatever