>2025
>Trannyfox continues to be an embarrassing joke

What if you use the Auto Tab Discard extension for Firefox?

https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/auto-tab-discard/

>>105651233 (OP)
This is the cost of letting Rusttrannys into your codebase.

Safari is probably even more efficient. It's the only reason I use it on macOS. Usability wise, it's pretty bad.

>>105651233 (OP)
The Chinese botnet integrated into Opera really sucks up power, huh?

>>105651233 (OP)
>Arc, new browser
let me guess... chromium based?

>>105651233 (OP)
I wonder how this compares for Firefox derivatives

>>105651233 (OP)
>used firefox from 2000-2020 or so
>edge comes out and works as an alternative browser plus firefox having all sorts of weird virtue signaling
>now 2025 reinstalled firefox yesterday because adblockers dont work on chromium anymore

I don't care I'm still using Firefox.

>>105651233 (OP)
Nobody gives a fuck about your graph nerd. People are going to use the browser that let's them bypass the YouTube ads retardation

>>105651233 (OP)
Don't care, still not using anything based on the Chromium engine. I don't want a browser engine monopoly.

>>105651233 (OP)
I don't use Firefox on my phone despite it supporting addons because it consumes twice as much battery while being twice as slow
I hope with AI coding getting better we see a better competition to Blink than Gecko

>>105651233 (OP)
I won't use jewgle webkit trash akshit.

>>105651233 (OP)
Firetoddlers BTFO!

>>105651792
uBlock works fine on Edge

>>105651233 (OP)
>they tested the same browser five times, then firefox once
>they got wildy different results for the 5 different tests of chrome
>they think the results are a deeply meaningful reflection of how different these browsers are

>>105651265
>browse with 65535 tabs
>blame firefox
>praise chrome for saving memory by discarding most of them
Have you considered that you don't need those tabs?

>>105651233 (OP)
The only embarrassment is that you don't have anything better to do than complaining what software someone else uses

>>105651489
The JS engine used in Firefox is pretty inefficient, but if this is comparing the defaults I think LibreWolf would actually be really good. Same with Brave. According to a lot of benchmarks blocking ads saves a ton of battery life, so any browser with a pre-installed adblocker is automatically going to be top tier.

>>105651472
Yes, but it doesn't matter anymore. The devs abandoned it and are now developing an "AI browser".

>>105653260
>AI Browser
lulwut

>>105651233 (OP)
>alphabetical order
what a poorly made bar graph

>>105655495
The only AI browser we need is one that just outright generates every page you visit with AI.
I want to surf an internet that doesn't exist. I want to explore parallel universes in my web browser. Some slightly different than our own. Some utterly bizarre. I want to open alt-reality news sites, then check not-Twitter and read live reactions to events that aren't happening. I want to hear about alien invasions, dogs discovering the cure to cancer, and does is giraffe ubuntu clock?
Someone get on this shit already.

>>105651233 (OP)
Who gives a shit about battery life? Are you in a power outage?
I use a desktop plugged into a UPS with a house generator, and sometimes a laptop in the living room with the brick plugged in behind the recliner.

>>105651233 (OP)
thank god I use Icecat

That's nice, but I'm still not using your chromium slop.

>>105657712
most of this is just the regular internet