*drops micers*

the idea that carbon is bad for the planet stems from politicians wanting to control you. you exhale carbon dioxide, if that is a problem you should probably kill yourself.

>>105657644 (OP)
this won't change anyone's minds, the people who said that was their problem with it were lying as a pretext for disliking llms on an aesthetic level
and as a proxy for their hatred of ~da techbros~

>>105657644 (OP)
Yeah but those numbers aren't that big. It's easily producing that many messages per day

>>105658864
anon, please learn about the carbon cycle.
it's already too late to fix anything, life on earth as we know it has about 500-1500 years left
so there's no real point in worrying about it. I actually take comfort in knowing that most of the people dying in the climate apocalypse will be jeets

Actually burning an entire box of trash liners you crumpled up into a big ball for fun using kerosene is extremely if you assume a rate of 0.00001g CO2 per minute

>>105658961
anon, please learn what the ocean is.
it's full of something called phytoplankton and the moment any CO2 flows over it the phytoplankton just eat it all up.
there's literally zero risk that we're going to die from CO2 emissions. plenty of other things out there will kill us but not fucking plant food you retard.

>>105659056
Isn't the issue that the warming/acidification of the ocean is killing plankton/algae?

>>105657644 (OP)
>make up a CO2/message value
>comparisons can be anything you want

>>105659063
Shhh. Don't make him have to deal with secondary effects.

>>105659063
We're already warming and the ocean is a gigantic buffer solution which resists change in pH.
You are, however, free to kill yourself to save the environment if you wish.

>>105659078
Yes a buffer that isn't successfully being emptied

>>105659080
Prove it. Plus phytoplankton, in their great abundance, will very quickly evolve to where they need to be.

>>105657644 (OP)
Seriously how much is GPT inference? Just raw electricity usage, not counting AC, networking, and hardware. 50 watts for 30 seconds maybe? My 3090 eats 350w doing inference. I assume proper Blackwell accelerators are more power efficient.

>>105659056
nah, it's already over
we got somewhere over 3341 gigatonnes of carbon in the atmosphere alone

>>105659102
do you part anon. co2 is scary stuff.

I can't find a source for the 0.125g CO2 per message. Everything I find says about 2-3 grams per query. That being said, it's still not much at all. You could ask about 100 queries per day for a year and it would be around 1% of the average person's (at least in US) annual CO2 footprint.

>>105657644 (OP)
How much Co2 did it cost to make this image?

>>105659078
>the ocean is a gigantic buffer solution which resists change in pH.
https://ocean.si.edu/ocean-life/invertebrates/ocean-acidification#section_77

>>105659113
no need to be edgy
we'll be long dead before it's actually a problem

>>105659119
>You could ask about 100 queries per day for a year and it would be around 1% of the average person's (at least in US) annual CO2 footprint.
The thing that is worrying is the amount of stuff that is layered on top of LLMs.
You do just about anything online now and some service sends that input to an LLM, either to generate summaries, give suggestions, make example images for you or whatever.

>>105659102
At least I can have a little bit of solace in the fact that I wasn't the class of people who went out of their way to create billions upon billions of worthless 3rd worlders because I saw a crying nigger baby on tv. Which is the same class of people who are really concerned about CO2 emissions.

>>105659127
Oh no, not a clearly biased source. Anything but that. anyway I argued that the ocean would resist change and it does. I didn't argue that it wouldn't change at all.

https://www.science.org/content/article/marine-creatures-survived-ancient-ocean-acidification
>The air's CO2 content rose to about twice today's level.
>Researchers studying an ancient episode of high ocean acidity have discovered that a group of marine creatures living at the time adapted to the change in water chemistry.

>>105659160
>a group of marine creatures living at the time adapted to the change in water chemistry.
I wonder what happened to the rest.

>>105659160
>Marine Creatures Survived Ancient Ocean Acidification
>But modern-day acid buildup is occurring much faster

>>105659188
Well, we gone find out innit?
Sooner we get to murdering the 3rd world the sooner we can live in harmony with the planet. All other goals are secondary. Trying to conserve resources is just making room for another brown to have another kid to fill the space your kind so nicely provided.

>>105659160
>global warming is fake but also India caused it
Nice b8 m8

>>105659206
I hope you one day have a nice bath in the Ganges.

>>105659214
Look here this guy wants to fucking nuke the poor so there’s no more poors, genius I tell you, why haven’t the rich thought of this before.

>>105659232
HELLO SAAAR

>>105659232
GOOD MORNING SAAR

>>105659239
>>105659246
>if you don’t believe in an ethnostate based on nuking poor people over fake global warming, you’re poor and should be nuked

>>105659258
SAAAR DO NOT REDEEM THE SHARTY SAAAAAR!!!!

Anyway, the moment that CO2 ever became a real problem China will just launch the genuine certified Wuhan brand COVID and kill off 95% of the world's population so no biggie. The world will go on.
Hopefully in the mean time you tards don't try to give nuclear reactors the the rapidly browning world for obvious reasons.

>>105659119
How many grams of CO2 would a human use doing the same task? That's a funny question that's never answered.

>>105659378
>obviously this can’t be a real problem or else we would’ve killed 95% of people already
Stunning insights from anon, they just keep coming

>>105659205
You wont do shit. :) my gf is white btw