Is there any technical reason why GNOME doesn't support server side decorations on Wayland?
If you added support for the protocol in a merge request, would they accept it?

What's the use case?

>>105668825 (OP)
laziness. and let's just say you coded a great solution that doesn't break compatibility, it would be rejected because epussy or one of his homosexual friends can't claim any credit for the code or idea. they are so petty that they would rather set back gnome by years just so they could take credit for making it better.

Can we bring him over to the good side /g/? Make him finally understand why people want what they want?

>>105668825 (OP)
>If you added support for the protocol in a merge request, would they accept it?
>would they accept it?
lol, try it

Wayland doesn't support per-window theming in SSDs. You must use CSDs if you want GTK windows to look consistent with dark theming.

>>105668825 (OP)
Gnome is a project by microsoft to sabotage Linux, so no. They just want to give the impresssion of a semi functional product, but painful to use. It's how microsoft sabotages Linux.

>>105668825 (OP)
>another irrelvelant debate that serves no utility to 99.99999% of humanity

gee i wonder why the year of the linux desktop TM will never come to pass

>>105670391
So an intentionally sabotaged DE is still better than literally every other Linux DE? Fucking kek.

>>105668825 (OP)
There are ideological reasons that they would never accept that feature being added or merged, which they might pretend are technical reasons. That goes for a lot of gnome decisions.

>>105670400
How does Globohomo dick taste?

>>105670470
>schizobabble defending inane debates
yawn

>>105670472
Answer the question

>>105668825 (OP)
Gnome only is supposed to run GNOME™ apps. If Linux apps happen to work it is only coincidental.

>>105670412
Cinnamon is better.

>>105670412
Gnome is genuinely awful, GTK in general just feels gross sloppy amateur software. Highly opinionated in the wrong way, clunky and obtuse. Limited functionality. Like a Hollywood movie parody of a desktop, not designed for actual use, looks like a Flash website from 2001.

>>105670391
Microsoft is following the same playbook with their own products.

>>105670412
Every other DE is eons ahead of GNOME by every metric.

>>105671086
this what KTards can't understand.

>>105668825 (OP)
>would they accept it?
usecase for improving software?

>>105668825 (OP)
they want to force you to use GTK to get native-looking decorations

>>105668825 (OP)
GNOME tried to prevent any desktop from supporting SSD on Wayland. They're fucking horrible.

>>105668825 (OP)
>would they accept it?
No, they're unpaid volunteers. They don't have the time to over your merge request.

>>105668825 (OP)
>GNOME doesn't support server side decorations on Wayland?
It does? Why are you lying?

Also server side decoration is objectively worse

>>105672997
No they didn't, it takes 5 seconds to look the issues up instead of listening to Pedordie Robertson
>Wayland inherently works by asking clients (programs) to draw themselves
>Which means they have to draw window controls too
>Later down the line an SSD protocol came along
>The protocol only allows clients to ask for SSD which can still be denied even if supported (COSMIC does this)
>Clients still need to CSD as a fallback because they can only control what they draw

>>105668825 (OP)
All GNOME applications use client side window decorations as dictated by the laws of the GNOME HIG. So tell me...What *exactly* is the usecase for server side window decorations when none of the GNOME apps are going to be using it, hmm?

If you are going to make pull requests then you have to explain the usecase behind them. Just because you make a pull request does NOT mean we are under any obligation to accept it.

Usecase means everything.

>>105676119
>accept all prs
>keashes

>>105668825 (OP)
Is there any technical reason you refuse to kill yourself, ESLer?

Are you a Chink or a Jeet?

>>105670412
too obvious, rakesh
500rb have been deducted from your account

>>105676103
>>Clients still need to CSD as a fallback because they can only control what they draw
Nah, just don't draw any decorations :^)
You DO use super + mouse for actions, right?

>>105675708
That's an X11 app you fucking retard.

>>105675708
>Also server side decoration is objectively worse
You are clinically retarded. There is nothing you can say that will save you.