Thread 105672908 - /g/ [Archived: 904 hours ago]

Anonymous
6/22/2025, 7:47:45 PM No.105672908
Screenshot
Screenshot
md5: c90590f9038a6da4903b1d85597e373b🔍
>turn normal doc into a zip file
>gets reduced 10x
>turn video into zip
>basically stays the same size
why hasnt this improved at all over the years?
Replies: >>105673000 >>105673014 >>105673069 >>105675598 >>105675947 >>105678028 >>105678039 >>105678474 >>105678478 >>105678760
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 7:56:35 PM No.105673000
>>105672908 (OP)
The modern version of this is training an AI on the video then generating it later with a prompt
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 7:58:50 PM No.105673014
>>105672908 (OP)
video codecs already do that
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 7:59:33 PM No.105673025
are you fucking retarded
Anonymous
6/22/2025, 8:05:19 PM No.105673069
>>105672908 (OP)
>vacuum out the air from a pillow
>gets reduced 10x
>vacuum out the air from OP's brown body
>basically stays the same size
wooooooooooooooooooooow

consider suicide, jamal
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 12:46:48 AM No.105675598
>>105672908 (OP)
/g/ - Technology
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 1:40:59 AM No.105675947
>>105672908 (OP)
>turn data with lots of repetitions into a compression format that compresses stuff by reducing the space taken up by repeated data
>gets reduced 10x
>turn completely random ass data with 0 repetition into a compression format that compresses stuff by reducing the space taken up by repeated data
>basically stays the same size
wow I wonder why
>why hasnt this improved at all over the years
because there are physical limits to what is possible, there are some cases where further compression of lossy formats can be done (e.g. jpeg to jpeg-xl, losslessly optimizing mp3s from cbr to vbr by discarding the empty useless bits with mp3packer) but this is usually only possible with old inefficient technologically dated formats and even in that case the efficiency gains are very very small (20% at best in the case of jpeg from 1980 losslessly transcoded to modern jpeg-xl, less than 5% when optimizing an mp3 with mp3packer)
losslessly optimizing an h264 stream would be mental, the complexity is just too high.
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 7:35:26 AM No.105677908
1750616099420788_thumb.jpg
1750616099420788_thumb.jpg
md5: 594032738e17e1fc80942316404a099f🔍
compress this faggots
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 8:05:20 AM No.105678028
>>105672908 (OP)
nigga, the video is already compressed, you can't losslessly recompress compressed data
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 8:07:57 AM No.105678039
>>105672908 (OP)
Most intelligent /g/ poster
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 8:54:31 AM No.105678262
how much bigger would video files be if they were completely uncompressed? x100?
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 9:33:32 AM No.105678474
>>105672908 (OP)
is there a way to compress files harder if we don't have the constrain of having to decompress it fast enough to be able to watch a movie? removing also the constrain of being able to buffer by decompressing piecewise
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 9:34:06 AM No.105678478
>>105672908 (OP)
video files are already compressed retard
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 10:23:57 AM No.105678740
just use ffmpeg
Anonymous
6/23/2025, 10:29:41 AM No.105678760
1619980850260
1619980850260
md5: 886ef34bbb2bde6cd20991af072bfbf4🔍
>>105672908 (OP)
because it is compressing already compressed data, not efficient

brace everyone, summer is here.....