Isnt HDR10 better than Display HDR400? Why is it more expensive the Display HDR400?

protip: if it's not miniled or oled, there's no hdr

>>105684638 (OP)
hdr10 is a encoding and transmission standard for content and hdr400 is a hardware certification for the monitor, they are not comparable

>>105684652
So in which one of those monitors will my chinese cartoons will look better?

>>105684675
oled with good color calibration

>>105684652
>oled
>400 nits
>"hdr"
lol

>>105684669
On amazon they are making you pay 250$ for hdr10 and the other 370$ for the hdr 400

400 is a bigger number than 10

>>105684703
hdr10 isn't a monitor spec. it has nothing to do with the monitor. it's how the video you're watching is encoded.

amazon lists hundreds of random keywords they don't give a shit about accuracy of what they are selling

>>105684675
On an OLED TV in a dark room.
PC monitors are for spreadsheets not for cartoons Chinese or otherwise.

>>105684698
there are oleds that can hit 400+ nits it's just that the OP doesn't understand that he's trying to compare a video file standard with a hardware standard. the poor naming doesn't help but they are completely unrelated

>>105684691
They look like they will lit my room on fire if I use it to much?

Does it get boiling in heat? Never touched an OLED.

/g/ents what happen if my video card is nvidia and the monitor supports AMD? Will it be an trouble?

>>105684753
>there are oleds that can hit 400+
only when there is a white dot on a pitch black background. otherwise it gets ABL raped to sub 150-200 nits

>>105684638 (OP)
>hdr400
>400
mean shit. You need 1000+
And it's a certification, that your display can do at least 400nit. Not an industry standard unlike HDR10, HDR10+, dolby vision etc...

Are the ASUS ROG Swift any good?