← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 105686241

30 posts 8 images /g/
Anonymous No.105686241 [Report] >>105686319 >>105686627 >>105686846
What went wrong?
Anonymous No.105686252 [Report]
Nothing
Anonymous No.105686257 [Report]
vested interests against it
Anonymous No.105686292 [Report] >>105686348
nothing, it's going well
Anonymous No.105686319 [Report]
>>105686241 (OP)
Developers are lazy to drop directx and Xbox requires directx anyway
Anonymous No.105686327 [Report]
the only thing I can think of that went wrong was ml. what could have been...
Anonymous No.105686348 [Report] >>105686371 >>105686377 >>105686662 >>105687036 >>105687276
>>105686292
>it's going well
Anonymous No.105686371 [Report]
>>105686348
considering what vulkan is, yes, it's going well. are you one of those opengl purists or something.
Anonymous No.105686377 [Report]
>>105686348
Literally every windows game on Linux is a vulkan game.
Anonymous No.105686387 [Report] >>105686394
>having worse adoption than the previous API it was supposed to replace is doing well
Anonymous No.105686394 [Report]
>>105686387
again, it's doing relatively well. i don't get what's so hard to understand.
Anonymous No.105686509 [Report] >>105686522
API that no one wants to use is not doing well
Anonymous No.105686522 [Report]
>>105686509
do you think i didn't know people don't want to use it or something?
Anonymous No.105686524 [Report]
>muh popularity argument
Your life is devoid of meaning. Stop attempting to infect others with your misery.
Anonymous No.105686572 [Report] >>105686578
There's no reason to use Vulkan when dxvk and MoltenVK exist.
Anonymous No.105686578 [Report]
>>105686572
What the fuck do you think MoltenVK is? Hint: it doesn't let you run Metal binaries on Vulkan.
Anonymous No.105686597 [Report] >>105686710
>i-it's not that i wanted this public API to be used by public, baka!
Anonymous No.105686627 [Report]
>>105686241 (OP)
allowed the steamdeck/linux gaming to to exist with the directX to vulkan translation layer?
Anonymous No.105686662 [Report] >>105686667 >>105686696 >>105686914
>>105686348
If DirectX is the popular one why do like almost all of those graphics programming tutorials try to teach OpenGL?
Anonymous No.105686667 [Report]
>>105686662
Ever heard of phones?
Anonymous No.105686696 [Report]
>>105686662
DirectX chads don't need no tutorial.
They read the specs.
Anonymous No.105686710 [Report]
>>105686597
rape
Anonymous No.105686831 [Report] >>105686993
directx better
Anonymous No.105686846 [Report]
>>105686241 (OP)
Developers are retarded, see unreal engine
Anonymous No.105686914 [Report] >>105686993
>>105686662
opengl better.
Anonymous No.105686993 [Report]
>>105686831
>>105686914
yb better.

i'm sorry.
Anonymous No.105687036 [Report]
>>105686348
>games
>"DirectX" sliding hentai puzzle game #4025783 on steam counts towards the DirectX portion

Lol, lmao
Anonymous No.105687138 [Report] >>105687187
imagine if instead of having sql server, you were provided with key-value storage library and had to build your own sql server on top of it.
that's vulkan. it's not a graphics api per se, but a set of graphics primitives.
Anonymous No.105687187 [Report]
>>105687138
also, the idea of vulkan as middleware doesnt make much sense, because making graphics API in user space is a wrong abstraction layer.
Anonymous No.105687276 [Report]
>>105686348
Direct X does so much more than graphics, so you're comparing lemons with limes.