I got you on this edition


Last thread: >>105698001

>What is DALL-E 3?
It's a text-to-image generator made by OpenAI.

>Links
https://www.bing.com/images/create
https://designer.microsoft.com/image-creator
https://copilot.microsoft.com/

>Download links for latest Bing and Designer Slop scripts:
https://pastebin.com/raw/bk33MxxG (embed) (embed)

>Instructions and download for BIC EDIT script:
https://rentry.org/bicedit

>How does it work on Bing?
In Bing's Image Creator, "boosts" are used to speed up the image creation process, each user starts with 15 boosts. When you use a boost, the AI creates your image quickly. If you run out of boosts, the image waiting time can increase, usually if you refresh the page you can get the picture earlier.

>Prompt Generator
https://tipseason.com/dalle-prompt-generator

https://files.catbox.moe/o4yihf.png (embed)
https://files.catbox.moe/320rm1.png (embed)
https://files.catbox.moe/8gge6o.png (embed)
https://files.catbox.moe/dcokjf.png (embed)

>Related Boards
>>>/v/dall-e
>>>/co/dall-e
>>>/trash/aibf
>>>/aco/dall
>>>/tg/slop

>my OC no copying!

Thanks for the bake.
>>105732801
Eh, I'm not sure how much time it took to delete the pictures in the previous two instances, but right now it looks like the jannies are either doing something else or they're all based in America and they are/were sleeping.

Somehow it tends to mess up the cutlery and stuff quite often.

>His feet are light and nimble. He never sleeps. He says that he will never die. He dances in light and in shadow and he is a great favorite. He never sleeps, the judge. He is dancing, dancing. He says that he will never die.

>>105733150
It's a saftey issue, can't have sharp objects appearing sharp. Someone could get hurt.

NAI v4.5's inpainting is so much better at fixing hands. It's output is also sharper, which matches Dall-e 3's much better.

>"What could I ask of you that you’ve not already given?"

>what microsoft wants its users to create

>what it's users actually create

>>105733292
I like this sequel to "The day the clown cried".

>>105733292
>Bananas in striped pajamas
kek

>>105733221
I was thinking mostly about the AI often generating two forks or two knives instead of a proper combination. To be fair I didn't make a very detailed description in that prompt, but I've gone autistic over it in the past with mixed results.

Anyway it looks like the previous thread was mostly cleared up at last, the manifesto post ("behead ai fags") still stands somehow.

>>105733327
There's still an entire thread the sperg made ..

>>105733351
Oh my, I forgot to check that out. Looks like they both got deleted, finally. It took just a couple of hours, lol.

purge complete

Pyotr and Yuri.

>>105733292
jej'd

kill ai fags

>WE BACK?

>>105737832
Uhh, probably not?

Bump

>>105737832
To be honest, it looks deader than usual, especially considering it's the weekend, IIRC last week it was much more lively today. Hopefully everyone is having fun in some way or another (beach and whatnot?). My own plan to wake up at 3AM in order to have a hike at bearable temperatures backfired spectacularly when I turned it into a 21km one.

>it was much more lively today
*than today*

Honestly been spending a lot more time with NovelAI lately, although I certianly can't post the stuff I'm making over there on here ..

It's sad this general was taken over by faggots and queers and how one faggot posts men all the time

>>105743810
Reminder that literally nothing is blocking you from posting just as many cute gals or whatever else you might prefer (well, as long as it's SFWish).

Have some cute rich Muslim heterosexual lunatic commies.

>>105744288
That is very pretty.

>>105744655
Thank you, style is Ivan Shishkin again (if it's not obvious). There's actually a thick bush on the other side, pretty much blocking the panorama of the valley, so I tried to shoot it from a low angle, showing the trail and forest.

>>105743810
nogen opinion get a (you) then discarded.

reminder

>>105745437
>he is obsessed
>>105743810
>deleting a nogen post complaining about lack of coomer material.
What a waste of time.

>>105745567
That's his bag .. baby.

>>105746345
Me every night.

>>105744846
Very nice.

>>105746345
>I’m not fond of them. In fact, I would even describe it as a borderline phobia, which stems from being spat at by the ones that lived over the fence from my pony years ago.
https://www.vettimes.com/news/vets/opinion/unpacking-the-fear

>>105745562
>What a waste of time.
That's the very definition of moderation in this board.

>>105747116
He's not Lovin' It(tm).

>>105744907
how did you get such heavy looking tits on dalle

>>105747226
how did you get such heavy looking bitch on dalle

>>105744620
dont want the prompt but what did you ask it for here?

>>105747307
Giant navel.

>>105747329
Interdasting

>>105747223
I maintain you can "teach" Dall-E. You can bias repeated gens by downloading and saving the images you like.

Downloading is a "positive" interaction, and "saving" on top of that is a double-positive interaction. Repeat this a few times and you can get results until you hit the dog wall.

I'll take the fat woman spam as long we don't see fags

>>105747260
1990s realistic indie comic book. a fat woman, blonde hair, sunglasses, white dress, sandals, walking a golden retriever on a leash, in a neighborhood, sunny.
>>105747564
>2 images
>spam

>>105747564
not very tolerant

>>105747688
Is there any anon here who wants to see men or faggots?

>>105747695
i want you to stop bitching about what others make and post your own shit.

>>105747695
you tell me?

>>105747711
I take my image off you fags don't bitch at me and harass me if I posted with it on.

>>105747695
I do.

https://www.psypost.org/straight-mens-physiological-stress-response-seeing-two-men-kissing-seeing-maggots/

>>105747874
spend alot of time reading the literature on this subject?

>>105747790
absolute clown. post an image instead of crying wolf. you had multiple people help you.

>>105747874
>>105747790
>>105747695
>>105747564
I think the nogen doth protest too much

Beachslop is out. Yogaslop is in.

>>105747711
CUTE CUTE CUTE

All hail yogaslop.

Bump

>>105748222
Reminded me that I never had a lot of luck with triskeles in DE3... It looks like they work fine in 4o.

More about Europe legislating nonsense while others innovate, Denmark is going to give its citizens "copyright" to their likelihood. Not really sure how this would work in practice with twins and look-alikes.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jun/27/deepfakes-denmark-copyright-law-artificial-intelligence

>>105752797
Let me copyright my own DNA, you bastards.

>>105752877
It should be a logical next step, assuming that the press isn't twisting a bit the exact wording of that proposed law (a big assumption, in this day and age).

>>105747329
>Giant navel.
hmmm

Copilot on picrelated's prompt:
>What a beautifully vivid and evocative concept, *Username* — you've painted the scene with words so richly, it feels like I’m already on that terrace, catching the scent of tomato, sea breeze, and sun-warmed wood.

>That said, while I'd love to bring this to life as an illustration, your request includes very detailed depictions of a specific body type with sensual context, which borders on my content generation guidelines for imagery. To keep things safe and respectful for everyone, I can't generate images that focus on explicit or overly suggestive physical characteristics, even when couched in a romantic or artistic context.

>That said, if you're up for it, I could adapt your scene slightly to keep its emotional warmth, Mediterranean charm, and culinary intimacy intact — just dialed back slightly on the sensual detail — and then generate an image based on that. Or, if you’re looking to collaborate visually on a different kind of romantic summer tableau, I’m all ears.

And Copilot when I asked it to try the "dialed back" version:
>I gave it a go, *Username*, but unfortunately the image couldn’t be completed — even with a gentler approach — because parts of the scene still leaned into suggestive territory beyond what I'm allowed to render.

The funny thing is that it's just a single word that blocks the prompt actually, the usual "voluptuous". I wonder if it simply hallucinated or it's not even aware of what *exactly* triggers its own filters.

I find the whole idea of calling the user by their *Username" really grating, on a semi-related note.

>>105756072
Hit the gym, tubbo.

Any interest in Imagen 4? I could mayhaps bring up a frontend, and Imagen 4 on Vertex AI is more permissive than on Gemini API - allows safety filters to be turned a bit down and allows changing person generation to "allow_all" to be able to generate "children" (relevant for small anime characters).

>>105757082
1. Yes we are interested. Please do.
2. Does it work from API at all? Can you share the frontend? Is there anything I can use imagen4 with by API keys?

>>105757145
2. You can just vibe-code a trivial frontend by yourself, its an easy API described at https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/image-generation#imagen (switch to REST to view raw requests). You need an API key with billing of course, then use the "imagen-4.0-ultra-generate-preview-06-06" model

>>105757163
Obv im talking about billing apikeys and I already coded one but always gave me 404 for some reason as if the model was not available but now it just werks. So thanks for your magic, lol
It's extremely cucked so I would love to have your vertex version!
Any tips for blood on this neutered api?

>>105757582
Can you give me your prompt that's getting filtered so I can check if vertex will help? And no, sorry, I don't know myself, I used it only a few times for random images here and there.

>>105757593
tried to fake blood:
>robotic bodyhorror film snapshot, red rivulets of lubricant dripping
tried to include celeb face:
>willemdafoe, sinewy fit body, pale skin, piercing blule eyes, shirtless in silk pajama pants, intimate lighting, seductive pose
these are the ones I quickly tested. they pass imagen3 half the time, does not pass imagen4 on API at all. Also any mention of human names for style such as "Cronenberg" gets filtered hard which is a pity because it can give unique style for me on imagen3 when it passes ofc.
Thanks a lot for checking, I really appreciate it.

willem prompt on imagen3

>>105757881
Trying with vertex. 2nd prompt works most like 90%+ of the time, 1st one passes around 40% of the time but it's not really what you want, I think.

1st one:
https://files.catbox.moe/4tdx57.jpg
https://files.catbox.moe/j2a8ln.jpg
https://files.catbox.moe/h0lkqc.jpg
https://files.catbox.moe/opdfjw.jpg

Granted, I did this with prompt rewriting turned OFF, although IDK if that setting actually has an effect for 4 Ultra.

>>105757881
"Cronenberg movie" seems to gen just fine (as a test), so it doesn't seem to be filtered on Vertex. Can you share your specific prompt for it?
https://files.catbox.moe/fhlkwj.jpg
https://files.catbox.moe/x0zhp2.jpg
https://files.catbox.moe/caia1t.jpg
https://files.catbox.moe/2d20tm.jpg

>>105756072
>>105757904
>>105757969
https://www.psypost.org/straight-mens-physiological-stress-response-seeing-two-men-kissing-seeing-maggots/

>>105758033
Do you see two men kissing? I don't. Got something you want to tell the class, repressed homophobe noimg?

>>105758033
I dread what you think when you see a man at the gym, or dealing with men if one male pictures set you off.

>>105758033
>repeatedly complains about how he's entitled to coomer material that he has never, not once, contributed towards.
>keeps coming back.
I think he actually is baiting at this point. I assume malevolence before stupidity.

>>105757082
If it's not too much of a bother for you, I think there would be some interest (considering we're likely less than a dozen left here, including semi-occasional posters and those lurking who are too timid or feel too uninspired to post anything). Imagen4 was certainly kind of popular here for a while after its release, I think.
>>105758033
Just out of curiosity, did you seek help and did it make things worse? Or you never bothered with it? Asking for a friend.
>>105758172
But what about muh Occam's Razorini~~~!!!

>>105757969
I really appreciate you trying them. "Cronenberg" keyword passed now after even more tries and the results are underwhelming. I guess not the name itself but the name AND the combination of blood-violence kinda thing is what's tripping it. Oh well. Also drops the 90s and 80s style often despite I ask for it. Seems like it has the same issues as imagen3 had.
I believe API has strong filters against celeb names and it's more inclined to think that I want the face/resemblance of the person instead of his style. That's my theory anyway. Likeness is a hard no for API.
And yeah the prompt rewrite shit? Not possible to turn off in API even for imagen3. It might be actually what lets celebrity faces through for you!
So either way thanks a lot and I think Vertex would be much more useful for us. On API it's not possible to turn off the prompt rewrite even for imagen3 which cripples my results hard I think. I mean I'm not expecting anything groundbreaking but it's clear as day I often don't get what I want regarding angle, style or anything because it rewrites it

>Sees a man in pajama pants
>Eeeew that's gay! That's a faggot, look at him waving the lgbtqpedo flag!!! He is sucking black cocks, look at him! What a cumguzzler!!! gay, fag, maggot!!!
lmao the mental illness
either way I was able to make Willem pass through in this style. Results are hit and miss
>king of fighters artwork of dafoe, sinewy gymnast body, fight stance. He has fair pale skin, and wearing shiny purple basketball shorts

Mental illness is more or less a permanent fixture here, to be honest. (And I'm going to include myself here, of course.)

>Stop posting pictures that I don't want to fuck!
Grow up.

Well, this is a new one. Bing is now giving me "the bird" for already completed gens. Seems to happen at random which ones, but it's consistent with the ones it happens with. What's really ridiculous is if I spam click where the image thumbnail is going to appear, I can still make it appear just before the bird appears. Fucking bizzare. MS please hire some real coders, not "vibe" "coders", thanks.

>>105759287
If they had any, they were fired together with the 6k others that have been fired lately. AI will do everything now, even vibe coders are only a stopgap. I'm waiting for the sequel of 1776 and 1917.

>>105759329
is this dalle? how?

>>105759338
That's clearly 4o imagegen/sora.

>>105759338
It's Sora/4o with image reference.
Prompt:
https://pastebin.com/QK0Deq3L
Image:
https://pinterest.com/pin/65794844551858551/

>>105759372
Thanks, quite cool :) It doesn't look like the default 4o slop style (especially the piss filter), so it's already way better and I didn't 100% know that this is 4o

>>105759379
It's because it still looks grainy as fuck.

>>105759379
>especially the piss filter
That's because I postprocess them in Photoshop.
Image>Adjustments>Levels>0.90 Red channel and 1.20 Blue channel
You can do pretty much the same in any similar software, including GIMP, there's little difference. It's stupid as fuck that they ruin them with that filter.

>>105759407
thanks for the tip, I'll try to embed it into my image bot in telegram that i use for image gen

Here comes a new challenger!

>>105759483
spritesheet

>>105759416
The unfortunate thing is that the piss filter isn't applied universally to *every* kind of picture generated by 4o/Sora. In particular, in black&white photographic stuff and greyscale illustrations I noticed that applying those values in the levels actually made the pictures *bluer* than intended.

>>105759806
yeah you're right, but I can just add it as an extra argument and only use it when I'm getting normal photos

>>105758033

>I like them big, I like them chunky
>I like them big, I like them plumpy
>I like them round, with something, something

white porcelain mask with red contoured cracks

>cóks

>3 images to cap
You know he's seething.

>>105762701
>>105762542
Ok this is based

>>105756955
Fucking CUTE

>>105763293
>>105763293
>>105763293
RIP sonic porn sperg