>>105779751 >m-m-MUH ALGORITHMS fuck you and your fake ass """""computer science""""" 99.99999% of software engineers use absolutely none of that shit, go back to doing code challenges faggot
>>105779951 no one but algorithm tards use recursion
Anonymous
7/2/2025, 8:55:51 PM No.105780004
This is one of those magic tricks they like to spook you with in college. No one in in the real industry writes recursive code for anything other than hyper topical specific use cases.
Anonymous
7/2/2025, 9:11:58 PM No.105780125
>getting filtered by recursion isn't that like 1st CS semester shit, are ternary operators scawy as well?
>>105779781 people like you are the reason computers litterally a million times faster than 40 years ago boot slower than an original macintosh off a fucking floppy does.
>>105779185 (OP) >I'm talking here about web Isn't XML all about trees and shit? Recursion is the natural choice here, updating a parent means updating all of it's children too. Not more complicated than any game engine with a scene/node system.
>>105780818 >he doesn't know about link reversal grim.
Anonymous
7/3/2025, 4:47:15 AM No.105784160
>>105779619 Writing a program recursively is a great way to model a problem before you optimize it. But in the real world the optimization step never happens because managers can't tell apart bikeshedding from improving the product.