>website is garbage operated by human waste
>will remain a successful monopoly forever anyway because competition is economically impossible

>>105789483 (OP)
*blocks your path*

>>105789483 (OP)
There are many competitors already.
YouTube is nothing more than a video sharing platform, and many of those already exist.
You don't need it to watch videos.
People become dependent on it because of convenience, nothing more.

Not only that, but also nothing lasts forever. Eventually every company will go bankrupt or be replaced by a superior one and be forgotten. Just look at Yahoo.

>>105789483 (OP)
Odysee and peertube are good alternatives that are economically feasible.

>>105789483 (OP)
>because competition is economically impossible
I think is mostly because most people don't make a single effort to detach form it's monopoly and look at the alternatives. Even though most of them don't have "muh cool features" youtube have (like having it's own app), there's a ton of alternatives getting more popular.

>>105789483 (OP)
>>105789644
>>105791155
Creators go where the money is and right now the money is with YouTube. And the audience goes where the creators are. And the money is where the audience is. And so on forever. There is no escape.

>>105791155
> from it is monopoly

>>105789483 (OP)
They will be successful because they have all the videos and they are already established as the top dog and it's too hard for a tiny startup with no money to rival them, and all the potential competition is run by the same breed of losers that already runs YouTube, except none of them have as much money as Google does.
YouTube WAS good however in the first few years of its existence and has been gradually declining just like everything else as America moves away from the land of startups and entrepreneurs and into a new world owned by big business.
Lol.

Unironically if you could watch all the porn on one site, and the search function actually worked..... you would
This is where Youtube is in anno 2025.

What could kill youtube
>Network/regional TV get it shit together and allows users to watch stripped down episodes, thereby removing the need to watch lower quality production, and find a sensinble way around region licensing cuckblocking all the good content alongside lack of discovery inside of the library
>Twitch could take the next step to eat youtubes lunch
>Tiktok could also do that
>Pornhub could expand into SFW content, or at the least could have a few years ago
>Neo GTP actually makes it, and manage to completely cut out youtube as a reliable information source, instead of the GTP pirating the correct manual pages and stitching them together with the correct youtube timestamps to create schematics/manuals

More people are using Twitter instead of JewTube.

>anyway
Youtube thrives because it's an informational landfill, not in spite of it. Normies and especially kids yearn for the slop. How else would TV have remained dominant for over half a century?

>>105792191
porn brained retard

>>105792191
Neo GTP? Fuck is that?

don't the chinks have their own version?
can't people jump to that?

>>105791155
>ShitChute
worse layout/ui, slower loading times, not used by anyone noteworthy, any content uniqueness (as in, too edgy for JewTube) is unavailable because "it is blocked in your country" (it isn't)

>>105789483 (OP)

>>105789483 (OP)
a competition could be economically viable, but creators would get less, money so most of them wouldn't leave youtube

>>105791968
Thanks.

>>105789483 (OP)
>>will remain a successful monopoly
more people use tiktok than youtube, the only reason youtube still persists is because of people like you that use it. there is nothing on that platform that you need to consume

>>105791234
"Creators" killed YouTube retard
Odysee just needs more usage, all the old Shir reuploaded from YT for convenience, doesn't need corpotuber cancer.

>>105789483 (OP)
>will remain a successful monopoly forever anyway because competition is economically impossible
The only reason for its success. Free unlimited uploads and speed, thanks to the work of the US government. All the US tech giants are fronts for government institutions.

>>105791155
I liked bitchute despite its setbacks (inconsistent loading time) up until they started censoring stuff. What's the point of switching from YouTube to YouTube but shittier?

Rumble and VK

>>105789483 (OP)
all alternatives look at the problem the wrong way.
they try to make an alternative youtube, which only ever attracts people you don't really want: those who've been banned from youtube for one reason or another. if you want to make a successful video sharing website, a better approach would be to make good video content and host it exclusively on your own website, and invite others to do likewise. because you're hosting good content (which you can still advertise on twitter or whatever), people might actually think to visit, check it out, and go "oh, wait, i can upload something too?", ultimately creating an organic video-sharing community independent of youtube.

>>105795388
kys

>>105792697
And t hat is all she wrote. Wow, what a deep and convincing argument

>>105791155
I avoid BitChute simply because it has "bitch" in the name.

>>105793334
Youtube has tons of stuff that can't be found anywhere else. Does Tiktok have 20-minute-long videos that explain animation techniques? I don't think so.

>>105796591
Bitchute was ugly, slow, and has way less features. Then they started censoring too.

>>105797847
Rumble is just right-wing politics/sports/finance/videogames. It feels like watching tv.

My biggest problem with Youtube nowadays is the search function, which as we all know, has been made worse to the point of being useless. But other than that, I like it.

>>105789483 (OP)
way back in the day we all believed in subliminal advertising. So, if it's true, YT should be able to just insert ad images into individual frames and the viewer wouldn't even notice, they would just suddenly think that some Doritos would be nice right now.
That would solve the advertising problem. No more interruptions, no more clicking "Skip" like a trained monkey, etc. etc.

>>105789483 (OP)
Why not just stop using it?

>>105789483 (OP)
There's no need for a mainstream competitor. I just want old-school YouTube (non-monetized, free-for-all, non-scammy, sincere content) back, but anonymous and decentralized. It only needs to be decently fast for it to get traction.
>>105799499
I avoid it because of the "ute". To each their own.

I love peertube

>>105797940
yeah that worked out great for LTT didnt it

>>105789483 (OP)
>>105789639

>>105801941
>>105801941