← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 105790236

29 posts 8 images /g/
Anonymous No.105790236 [Report] >>105790388 >>105790453 >>105790635 >>105791311 >>105792276 >>105793230
Shieeet, what ethernet cables you got
Shieeet, what ethernet cables you got
https://youtube.com/shorts/30yL7vzbtl4?feature=shared

Post home network setup and what cables you have
Anonymous No.105790388 [Report]
>>105790236 (OP)
what a dumb nignog
there's this thing called LAN where you might want 40gbps+ like oh maybe to stream game, transfer shit, record secureity cameras etc
Anonymous No.105790413 [Report]
I'm already using CAT9 cables. get with the times, grandpa
Anonymous No.105790453 [Report]
>>105790236 (OP)
She is using a very very very expensive keyboard
Anonymous No.105790635 [Report] >>105790862
>>105790236 (OP)
What is the message this image is trying to convey?
Anonymous No.105790862 [Report] >>105790937 >>105791311
>>105790635
People who are constantly pushing for war with Iran post photos of Iranian women in miniskirts from before the Revolution in order to contrast it with the modest clothing required by the Islamic government today. Those posts are meant to build support for military action against Iran to "liberate" women from the oppression they're said to be living under. OP's image is making a mockery of those propaganda posts.
Anonymous No.105790917 [Report] >>105792276 >>105793230 >>105796440
This is a original source of the image.
Anonymous No.105790937 [Report] >>105791038 >>105795736
>>105790862
Is this native 4chan AI?
Anonymous No.105791038 [Report]
>>105790937
If you're too retarded, paranoid, and lazy to understand such a straightforward post, does it really matter anymore as your brain is too full of pudding to make any difference.
Anonymous No.105791311 [Report] >>105791742 >>105795232
>>105790236 (OP)
>>105790862
I doubt iran ever wore bikini, last time i checked they killed a women for visible hairs out of hijab
Anonymous No.105791742 [Report] >>105791943
>>105791311
They were fairly liberal in women's clothing. The image of 'Middle east all hijab' is entirely wrong. And if we were to embrace it they would win.
Anonymous No.105791904 [Report]
now post the executions of Iranian opposition
Anonymous No.105791943 [Report] >>105791962 >>105791973 >>105792029 >>105793009
>>105791742
It's not entirely wrong you dumb brown, lol. Wow Iran and some of it's former persian states wore normal clothing for a brief period in the 20th century, the doesn't make it the norm.
Anonymous No.105791962 [Report] >>105792051
>>105791943
>normal clothing
Anonymous No.105791973 [Report] >>105792051 >>105795258
>>105791943
>It's not entirely wrong you dumb brown, lol
Question, why can women in muslim-ruled Syria still go outside without a hijab? What about Lebanon or Egypt? Muslims and islamists want to claim hijabs are fundamental to islam but that's simply not the case. Women in general wore headcoverings both in the middle east and most of Europe but not because of mohammad.
That's the same revisionism like claiming that all of the middle east is muslim and Christian though can not be properly portrayed in arabic.
Anonymous No.105792029 [Report]
>>105791943
>some of it's former persian states
What does this mean?
Anonymous No.105792051 [Report] >>105792097
>>105791962
Hello, Reddit.

>>105791973
What exactly is the point of your mental gymnastics here? Can you wear western (for the redditor) contempory womens clothing in Iranian or former Iranian states for the vast majority of near eastern history? No? Ok then, thank you.

Not that I care about irrelevant sand people regions or their politics, but stop trying to manipulate the conversation you dumb fuck brown.
Anonymous No.105792097 [Report]
>>105792051
>What exactly is the point of your mental gymnastics here?
The point you attacked, that the middle east requires hijabs. That's the point I made and you attacked. I don't care about the 'vast majority of near eastern history' when the hijab wasn't present for the time nor were 'contemporary women's clothing'. Stop trying to prove a faulty point through anachronisms.
Anonymous No.105792108 [Report]
I'm using CAT5e for 10gbps without any problem.

You only need to worry about CAT6+ if you're doing long runs.
Anonymous No.105792276 [Report]
>>105790236 (OP)
>>105790917
amazing that USA and Iran where so close in '75 that a US company used Iranian scientists in their ad
very different world today
Anonymous No.105793009 [Report]
>>105791943
actually you can just google iranian traditional dress and none of it is anything like hijab . Hijab is primitive moslty desert wear, even men wear it.
Anonymous No.105793230 [Report]
>>105790917
>>105790236 (OP)
you know, tech before had way more whitey, strong womyn and based niggas. Now it's all jeets/bugs baka
Anonymous No.105795232 [Report]
>>105791311
sure thing, jew. you've never lied before.
Anonymous No.105795258 [Report] >>105795322 >>105795336
>>105791973
>Question, why can women in muslim-ruled Syria still go outside without a hijab?

They can't.

ISIS-run Syria is currently massacring anyone who isn't a Sunni Wahhabist.

That's why the West said they won't hold an election in Syria until 5 years have passed because they believe it'll take that long to Wahhabize Syria because Syria was ruled by secularists who opposed Wahhabism.
Anonymous No.105795322 [Report] >>105795336 >>105796252
>>105795258
>ISIS-run Syria
Doesn't exist. The HTS is a front for Turkey while the ISIS is more of a direct force. That's why the HTS which is the current government distances itself from the bombing two weeks ago.
>is currently massacring anyone who isn't a Sunni Wahhabist.
They're mostly focusing on alevites. Christians still get heavily attacked but not 'massacred' in the open.
>That's why the West said they won't hold an election in Syria until 5 years have passed because they believe it'll take that long to Wahhabize Syria because Syria was ruled by secularists who opposed Wahhabism.
The west simply doesn't care since Syria is currently basically a vassal state of Turkey and everyone realizes that if the West tried to take back Syria it would just lead to a proxy war that's basically nato vs brics. The problem there is we currently got that in two different conflicts (ukraine vs russia, israel vs iran) and could make it a third if brics embraced palestine.
That these conflicts are still not won (especially the ukraine-russia one that was apparently just a two week endeavor according to both sides) and lead westerners away from their current governments makes them scared to fight for Syria. That's why we barely get any interest in the west regarding Syria's situation, both from our governments and our media. They simply can not afford another war despite having the money and the firing power.
Anonymous No.105795336 [Report]
>>105795322
>>105795258
I forgot the most important point.
>They can't.
They can. Many don't out of fear but there's nothing officially or systematically stopping the women from being without a headscarf.
Anonymous No.105795736 [Report]
>>105790937
Ong cuh, more dan 2 sentences?? AI deadass 100%
Anonymous No.105796252 [Report]
>>105795322
You sound like a cockroach because of how retarded you are

1.You're re**it ty*ing

2. You're lying about cockroaches not being with NATO

3. You're lying about Saudi Jewlani not being the leader of ISIS' Syrian branch Al Nusrah

4. You're lying about HTS not being ISIS because cockroaches made Saudi Jewlani wear a suit and change the name of the Syrian branch of ISIS

5. You're lying about every foreign fighter joining ISIS didn't go through cockroaches

6. You're lying about cockroaches not making ISIS in Syria and Iraq kill Armenians in Armenia a few years ago

7. You're lying about cockroaches along with Americans not sending gas weapons to ISIS

8. You're lying about cockroaches not being obsessed with the "west"

9. You're lying about Israhell not being a military outpost of the "west" (if you're not a cockroach, you're probably an american who deluded yourself into thinking da joos control your country so you can pretend you are not responsible for anything israhell aka an american proxy does)
Anonymous No.105796440 [Report]
>>105790917
honestly this would be kino