Soham Strikes Back - /g/ (#105795278) [Archived: 601 hours ago]

Anonymous
7/4/2025, 4:36:09 AM No.105795278
Screenshot_20250703-193442
Screenshot_20250703-193442
md5: fb33bc3049a5a9ab55a2202974f8aaff🔍
>Soham now accuses YC startup of stealing open source and passing it as their own
Is /g/ on team Soham or team YC?
Replies: >>105795329 >>105795338 >>105795375 >>105795403 >>105795419 >>105795542 >>105795866 >>105796159 >>105796315
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 4:43:42 AM No.105795329
>>105795278 (OP)
>Funny headline about indian abusing our companies turns into internet drama slop
Social media was a grave mistake
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 4:45:29 AM No.105795338
>>105795278 (OP)
Soham is a hero
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 4:51:02 AM No.105795375
>>105795278 (OP)
For once I'm tempted to be on the jeet's side.
>showing the folly of startup culture and how much of a massive circle jerk it is
>showing how easily abused the system
>proving that if you play by the rules created by nocoder hr stacies and the hipster rich kids in startups you lose
>proving that leetcode is all there is to trick retards into getting a job
>proving that jeets are just natural scammers
Replies: >>105795579
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 4:57:21 AM No.105795403
>>105795278 (OP)
Why is everyone suddenly talking about this guy? One remote work scam is not global news. Makes me think this is just astroturfed drama before he makes his big startup, just like that Columbia student who made the cheating tool.
Replies: >>105795447
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 5:01:06 AM No.105795419
>>105795278 (OP)
Buy an ad
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 5:06:10 AM No.105795447
>>105795403
It's not even a scam. You're remotely working on four different projects. How is that a scam? Since when are you allowed to only be employed by a single company?
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 5:29:36 AM No.105795542
Screenshot_20250703-202703
Screenshot_20250703-202703
md5: 05d9f0266868430ef6f8564eaf4f1316🔍
>>105795278 (OP)
>Trying to scam the GOAT of scamming
What were they thinking?
Replies: >>105796390 >>105797632
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 5:36:13 AM No.105795579
>>105795375
>For once I'm tempted to be on the jeet's side.
Protip: They're all jeets. It's literally jeets all the way down.
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 6:06:48 AM No.105795737
so all of the dozens of companies he scammed were conveniently doing illegal things
no? Hes just writing shit on twitter as a final fuck you before hes deported?
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 6:38:16 AM No.105795866
>>105795278 (OP)
i think its a different guy with the same name
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 7:28:34 AM No.105796159
0ef
0ef
md5: c7a2e928dc6cd45cd363343361482bf7🔍
>>105795278 (OP)
A scammer would know another scam best. Gonna give this jeet the kneel
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 7:31:18 AM No.105796173
I've noticed a lot of open source startups in hackernews lately. looks like they caught up to the make it open source then rugpull it into closed source when everyone is locked in meta
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 7:34:17 AM No.105796183
https://x.com/leinadpark/status/1941006548752650548
KWAB
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 7:46:48 AM No.105796242
YC startups are the worst thing i have ever seen. bs business plans and they cheat their employess all the time.

Sam Altman taught them how to cheat i guess
Replies: >>105796263
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 7:51:23 AM No.105796263
>>105796242
Their job postings are fucking hilarious though. They want one guy to do the work of 10 people without even listing the pay and the owner is either a jeet or a chink, without fail.
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 7:52:14 AM No.105796269
gay tan is a faggot, on the jeets side sadly for this one.
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 8:01:19 AM No.105796315
>>105795278 (OP)
Soham is a Jeet, and thus everything he says should be doubted.
Not that I'm rooting for the YCs, but distrust for the Jeet must be a reflex at this point.
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 8:16:42 AM No.105796390
>>105795542
I love how's he's still too stupid to know that you can get llms to rewrite it enough but smart enough to scam all these companies
And no I'm not on his side, he's a scam artist lying piece of shit, literally the last person on earth you ever want to work with.
Anonymous
7/4/2025, 11:56:28 AM No.105797632
>>105795542
>I can send you a DMCA for it
Not really but I see his point. However, he can get a DMCA (and even more) for leaking company code even if that code is stolen.