Some years ago I thought about making a browser extension that allowed people to write anonymous comments on any web page that other people who installed the extension could read and comment on, too.
Do you think this could be a good idea or is it just retarded?

Pic unrelated.

>>105814497 (OP)
Depends, can you say the nigger word on it? Pretty much useless if you can't.

>>105814523
>can you write an add-on that will be banned as soon as 4chan users start misusing it?
I dunno man, you tell me

>>105814497 (OP)
like a peanut gallery for the internet.

Pretty sure it existed and either got shitcanned or went nowhere.

>>105814523
Honestly this.


It's easy as shit to communicate in this age.

.either you make it competitive by lack of censorship or you suck my big fat black 6 inch cock

>>105814497 (OP)
>>105814540
>>105814568

https://www.cjr.org/analysis/dissenter-plugin.php

>>105814581
>>105814573
>>105814568
>>105814497 (OP)

there was such a extension, I used it in 2020
I forgot what it was when my laptop which broke down along with its OS, was the only computer where it was installed in

>>105814591
Wow no one cares nig

>>105814609
I am proving that the op poster has not invented anything new, it existed 5 years ago

>>105814587
>>105814591
Interesting, so there have been similar addons and they were shit or filled with comments by chuds and ended up dead

>>105814587
Dissenter was the one.
Google and Firefox showed they are both niggers working together. They removed it from their extensions on the same day, within the same hour.

>>105814649
Pretty easy to make a new one, just have a cheapo vps as db to store and encrypt the text (and only text) and dont use official extension stores and thats it, nothing can stop you. Also rangeban every country except europe and about 12 american states.

>>105814568
I like this idea

>>105814649
>>105814679
there used to be another chrome extension (zeeker) that was removed from the store a couple of years ago, apparently because it goes against googles policies... I guess it's over

>>105814568
imagine a 4chan comments overlay on every website

>only subscribers may reply to this post
hates these extensions

>>105814497 (OP)
it's a great idea but extremely anti-semitic so will be taken down one way or another
maybe if you avoid images you can lessen the impact glowniggers have on it (they'd post links to cp instead of images)

>>105815262
maybe you can get around the issue via p2p, then you have no admin and therefore no one is responsible, but glowniggers will run a campaign that creates a negative image for it so not many people will use it

>>105814497 (OP)
I think it is a good idea.
The logical progression is your company being bought out & turning to shit.
Go for it anyways, live a little and make that coin.

>>105814581
6 inches isn't big.

>>105814497 (OP)
>>105814712
Why is 4chan still so unique when it comes to anonymous posting and not requiring any account? You'd think that at least some other websites would follow suit.

>>105815474
Bigger than the average

It would be a nightmare to moderate the comments and would end up with endless spam if it would get widespread use

>>105815262
You could federalize it so that you only see comments from clusters you've subscribed to.
This avoids issues like oversaturation, glowniggers and cultural drift.
We could also use this tech to clean up search engines by local filtering via a merkle tree built from flag lists you've subscribed to, we could filter out most of the dead internet and not give it our time and attention.
Effectively the infrastructure is still a message board, but spatially it does not have its own page, it's laid over other pages. To avoid beaming your entire browsing history to the nodes, periodically pull directory data from them. Then pull per-site data intentionally bucketed with dozens of other sites, so that the node does not know for sure which one you actually are reading right now.

>>105815474
for a nigger it is

>>105815722
>not requiring any account
4chan sells accounts and does everything to incentivize you to you buy one
i post with an 'ass myself. it is what it is

>>105814540
If you have to censor it as hard as any globohomo website, there is no point in it existing.

>>105814497 (OP)
i had the same idea but gaining critical mass would be very difficult.
i don't think the benefits would outweight the hassle.

>>105814497 (OP)
Dissenter extension got banned from everything, so unless you want to make a competing extension store you wont be allowed to share anything like that, Dissenter from gab and to be turned into its own browser to work but development of it stopped after a while.

>>105815722
moderating forums is difficult

>>105816672
you get banned if you don't, retard

>>105816938
>critical mass
for what? to make money? how do you even monetize something like this?
I guess it could be made to appeal to niche audiences

>>105817570
they should have kept developing the extension, and could have asked to install the extension manually, no?

>>105814587
I was remembering the older hypothes.is, mentioned in the article
https://web.archive.org/web/20120822021941/http://hypothes.is:80/ as the domain got a rebrand since then. I still have the bookmarklet in my browser's bookmarks.

>>105818111
>they should have kept developing the extension, and could have asked to install the extension manually, no?

They did that for a while, then the browser.
But it just wasn't realistic to keep it going the adoption rate was just too low when both extension stores banned them.
Few people even heard about the browser after the attack campaign from the media it seemed like the browser got suppressed.

>>105818111
>and could have asked to install the extension manually
they did until browsers blacklisted it on a code level, forcing them to make a browser fork >>105819113

pee

>>105814497 (OP)
maybe try and reboot https://github.com/gab-ai-inc/gab-dissenter-extension

>>105814497 (OP)
Why not extend the idea and make it more of a website rating service, where you can rate and comment. Imagine that you found an interesting website/page or anything on the web, then you can share its URL, like a link aggregators but instead of it being a discussion, it's your rating and opinion, and others can do the same thing, and instead of the posts being related by the OP, they're related by the rated URL, so you can view all the ratings and comments by selecting a URL.

The user wanting to rate should be obligated to signup in a pseudo-anonymous way, to prevent spam and to make an archive of user submissions. There should be no upvooting-like system, so users are not influenced by other's opinions, but it should be a way to report spam and TOS violation (which should be prevented by some captcha/POW).

And you can add an extension to view comments/ratings of the current website.

>>105823438
I didn't think of it like this. sounds like an interesting twist to make the extension useful while preventing retards from abusing it too much because it would kind of take too much effort to spam their shitty "opinions".
I had thought the extension as something useful. like, want to visit a restaurant? go check their website, facebook page or whatever, and check the comments (opinions, interesting trivia, complaints, whatever) other people left within the extension or the main page linked to the URL by the extension.

Isn't that the same concept Digg, stumbupon, and Reddit are based around? Commenting on websites that don't have comments?

>>105823857
So i go to microsoft.com okay?
Where are the reddit comments? Could you point them out?

>>105823884
I don't know if they still do site pages anymore. Maybe there's still some way to access it like the old layout but I don't know it.

>>105814587
>Jessie Daniels, a Professor at CUNY’s Hunter College
I wish I was a professor at cunny hunter college

>>105814497 (OP)
Sounds like a pretty cool idea, yeah.

Are you going to call it "retard net"?

>>105814668
is there no way to use it now? I enjoyed it.

>>105814679
keep Japan too, the early days of the internet was all white americans, nips and europeans

problem with the idea is that unless you're ok with bots spamming NIGGER and affiliate links for chinese spam sites a trillion times on every page, preventing any possible discussions, you need moderation. and the second you implement algorithmic/AI/manual moderation, you have become what you hated to begin with (free speech commenting system)

not sure what the solution is - maybe a social credit system like china. sure, you can spam racial slurs on any page, but it will affect your ability to buy milk/eggs tomorrow. suddenly people will behave.

>>105814497 (OP)
there was something similar, but with images on 4channel.

>>105824003
that wasn't an issue when it was operational iirc

>>105824003
>(free speech commenting system)
whoops, meant *commenting system without perfectly free speech

why do retards in this board equate anonymiity with absolute free speech? are most retards here unemployed? do these dumbasses not know the consequences of managing sites like 4chan or similar?

>>105815722
>Why is 4chan still so unique
there's alt chans and the webring
also 4chan isn't an original idea, comes from 2channel and the popularity of anonymous Nipponese message boards

>>105824046
>everywhere you go you must follow the same language rules as in a formal meeting at a multinational company
retard

>>105820050
>they did until browsers blacklisted it on a code level, forcing them to make a browser fork
i hope something good comes out of the ladybird browser

>>105824066
>the opposite of absolute free speech is corporate speech
4chan """logic"""

>retard
>t.mentally ill, uneducated retard
go get a basic logic book and come back when you are able to finish the advanced exercises, you useless piece of shit

>>105819113
oh yeaaaah I forgot the dissenter browser, I used it for a few months before I swapped to brave. I don't actually remember what made me want to switch... it was a few years ago.