All other GNOME-based distros are redundant. Fuck Fedora. Fuck Ubuntu. GNOME is complete enough to be its very own OS. Anything else is a corruption.

>>105821302 (OP)
ok

>>105821302 (OP)
Literally bargain bin MacOS.

>>105821302 (OP)
so is kde, if you use the same components as any other distro and add kde into it. gnome os is the same thing
https://neon.kde.org/

>>105821302 (OP)
>Packages: 22 (flatpak)
how

>>105821354
>Literally just bleeding-edge Kubuntu

How blown out is your asshole OP?
You must take dick like a champ to be this die hard for the fooking foot

gnome os is their testing ground to test gnome, just like kde neon is kde's testing distro to test and debug kde. it probably wasn't meant or designed for end users, but for beta testers

>>105821389
or a slightly more bleeding edge fedora kde

>>105821389
Without snapshit, right?

>>105821436
yep, no snaps but only kde software is bleeding edge the rest of the system isn't

A feet?

>>105821492
with four toes even

No thanks. I'll be waiting for Kde Linux.

>>105821302 (OP)
Do you fail to understand what a distro is, or are you implying that Gnome is so complete you don't need any other packages?

>>105821517
>t. kde dev casually leaks kde linux on /g/

>>105821517
why are all their icons so unreadable ?
fucking trace a square or a circle and be done with it, this is not the sixtine chapel

>>105821525
All i need is gnome.
I imagine computer user just rearrange folders all day

>>105821302 (OP)
>too poor for the Apple tax

When are flatpaks going to die

>>105821790
what's wrong with flatpaks
>>105821642
>trace a square or a circle
that's like saying we should just copy windows 7 look

>>105821664
having the user constantly paying attention to the desktop environment itself is a failure of design desu

>>105821814
redtranny software and not well designed imo, the focus should have been more around appimage-type stuff and sandboxing that

>>105821302 (OP)
>GNOME is complete
I'm a gnome user & even I disagree with that statement. Afterall if it was 'complete' then why do I need to install half a dozen extensions ??? It has it's shortcomings but it's still my preferred DE.

>>105821985
(You) need to because you are a babyduck wintoddler

>>105821354
>>105821517
>Neon, KDE Linux
Krashde devs can't even build an independent distro, they just add a repo to other ones and call it a day. Neon is Ubuntu, kde Linux is arch.
GNOME OS is an independent distro built from the ground up.

>>105821302 (OP)
"attained nirvana"-tier BASED
if you are really daily driving gnome os then you have reached peak of chadhood
you are THE gigachad

>>105821517
>top corners are rounded
>bottom corners are not
i hate kde ""design"" so much its unreal
its round are four corners or don't round them at all
how hard can simple ux design be for you kdejeets

>>105821567
KDE Linux dev builds are publicly available:
https://community.kde.org/KDE_Linux

>>105821525
Flatpak.

>>105823665
Every DE should have their independent OS. It's a mark of their maturity.
I can die in peace when XFCE OS is a thing.

>>105821302 (OP)
>Kernel 6.13.6

>>105824601
>Decorations are rounded while client window is not
That has been the status quo for decades, you fucking retard.

>>105821302 (OP)
>a fucking foot

>>105825739
now show the actual one, the one that uses nautilus and mogs all others, the one that has global search

>>105825792
the what?

>>105821302 (OP)
I too approve of a footfag containment distro.

>>105821354
this is the offical kde os
https://community.kde.org/KDE_Linux

>>105827228
>video of development version that doesn't match the actual behaviour

just use fedora silverblue or universal blue distros

>>105821302 (OP)
Gnomeis shit i wont even put the effort in this opst fuck yu oOP

>>105825739
>>105827228
JESUS CHRIST GNOME IS SHIT

OP is right, in a sense. Gnome is complete enough to serve the needs of enterprise software and service providers like Redhat, SUSE, Canoical and others. That's what Gnome is for, and that's why Gnome intentionally breaks compatibility with extensions and limits customization features.
The average gormless enterprise drone that's calling in for customer support will need to be carefully guided through steps from someone working for the previously mentioned service providers, and the best way to ensure reliable results is to have the desktop interface (Gnome), be as simple as possible to navigate. Any sort of special customization options or distractions like files on the desktop could break those retard-proof flowcharts, so the people contributing to and funding Gnome make sure it isn't a thing.
The developer hostile attitude to things like server-side decorations and extensions is just more of that.
Gnome developers do not want Gnome to become overly popular for home users, because many of the needs and wants of home users are superfluous or opposed to the priorities of enterprise (where the real money is made).
Guys like Ebussy might believe some nonsense about Gnome's workflow being optimal (despite Gnome's development being suboptimal) but ultimately they are there to give post-hoc justifications for their enterprise focused design choices.

>>105821326
fpbp