Is this code good enough?

I can't trully automatized with functions, but I still feel like a pajeet writing this.

>>105849398 (OP)
LMAO. No.

>>105849455
okay faggot.

How do I automatize when the variables are unique for each line?

>>105849398 (OP)
>How do I know I am writing pajeet code.
Do you use an AI assistant?

>>105849500
No.

>>105849398 (OP)
That's the best way to do it. It's simple, easy to understand, and easily modified. Yeah it looks a bit dumb but once you have it in a function you won't have to worry about how it looks.

>>105849491
You are thinking the wrong solution my friend, the correct way to do it is by implement a proper node hierarchy, you can probably store all that a dictionary-

>>105849398 (OP)
A better way of doing this is to create a struct or data object that can store the relationship between the reference to the variable's text and whatever type the Root.game_options.X points to. Then create a dictionary to store this, then have the ResetUpdate functions loop through the dictionary and set the text to the associated game_option. This would make it more maintainable long term.

I don't know if you can do any of that though because this looks like Python so maybe you are doing it the best way

>>105849542
>>105849597
They're right. Logic like this you would abstract the language itself.
Ie. create abstractions for the properties themselves.