Range banned from an altchan recently. Part IV - Range banned for 1 year edfition

https://archive.ph/ZplTv
https://archive.ph/8Cdgd
https://archive.ph/XT8C4

If anyone wants to discuss the topic I laid out and explained in depth repeatedly in those threads, feel free. 5 or so years ago people were posting about this. Now everyone acts like bots, people and the net are bizarre, unbelieveable, and borderline intolerable at this point. No one will discuss this rationally despite it being extremely obvious that it;s going on. The denial is bizarre, the repeated deletion and banning is bizarre, none of it makes any sense if these are real people doing what they purport to be.

Anon, discuss this with us.

cy-x[]net
This is something I am extremely intrigued in but without any persistent forms of contact I cannot be confident that we'll be able to speak here and here alone for any long amount of time

You're getting into something that screams volumes. I am afraid of mentioning it here because I would rather not get this topic immediately, automatically taken down. Repost this on that website. I will immediately come on and let you know of my thoughts. I am aware.

I appear to be in an infinite captcha loop. 3rd time having to wait 120 seconds.

>>105855751
First you will tell me why you posted a gif essentially inverting Jack from Bioshock saving a Little Sister. After I just barely watched a video including it on youtube. The way the head is grabbed, the flashing light, it's all identical.

>>105855781
I chose a random file on my computer, I scrolled thru a couple folders to find something that'd seem funny but sort of related.. it's not contributive to the thread nor my post. I'm sorry about that.

>>105855781
>First you will tell me
not
>Would you kindly

>>105855823
I'm a courteous individual, what else can i say??

>>105855794
I'll think about it.

>>105855823
Yeah, a missed opportunity, I suppose.

>>105855833
Not me. Checked dubs though.

>>105855850
>>>105855833 (You)
>Not me. Checked dubs though.

I dont know what else to say other than this tha tI just noticed just now

My first post: 01:34:05, 3
Second post: 01:41:30, 3
Third post: 01:45:39, 3. No.105855833

One thing that I can say is that there is no such thing as 'random'.

>>105855302 (OP)
if OP isn't trolling, i have stuff like that too, i try not to force it or let it affect my decision making. Things like, the music starting right when a SpaceX rocket lifts off and when it lands, or when the streamer says goodnight and logs off. Maybe theres a deeper order to the universe that gets manifested in coincidences. I feel like it comes in waves. If you want to read what other people think, check out the book Sync, it talks about how systems can become coupled. But in the case of recommender algos, maybe its just technological rather than cosmic
either way, enjoy feeling like the world is special

>>105855875
>One thing that I can say is that there is no such thing as 'random'.
No. There certainly is not. The unconscious mind is also timing, counting, and correlating everything all the time. Right down to when you begin speaking to when you stop, and the gap between that and when someone replies. It is demonstrable that it times all of it and incorporates it into future output. It's also calculating and using gematria all the time, and causing you to time things and construct statements in a way that leaks what it's been focused on recently. It can be quite clever too, using pi jokes, square pyramidal numbers, cubes, w/e.

Some events can't really be handled in realtime though, which is where synchronicity and your days being scripted during sleep probably play a role. I've had things that were so precisely timed despite several chance happenings and unforeseeable events, that it's not plausible the brain can coordinate and pull it off in realtime. So there's some sort of nonlinear time or retrocausality aspect to it.

But whatever, that's a whole other layer. A person has to find it in their own life, until then it's just another idea. One example I'll give is what I dubbed the matching function. If I'm going to address 303, somehow I'll leave at just the right time. Discover my tire is flat, blow it up. Get behind someone in line at the store, takes way longer. Icy road conditions, have to go slow. And yet still, magically I'll pull into that address at exactly 3:03. I focused on it and told it to match, so it did. Or I'll think I'm going somewhere else, fail to find it, take some random route and end up seeing a sign for a place I'd heard of but never been to, and park at exactly 3:33. Or go to pay my electric bill and after the fact I'll look down, notice it's on 9/27 (3 squared / 3 cubed) and the timestamp on the receipt will be 1:37 PM, 137, 33rd prime number. Etc.

>>105855923
Not trolling at all. Char limit.

>>105855923
Yeah, I've thought about it like oscillator sync. Or "sympathetic magic". When the activity of two systems becomes similar enough, they entraina nd then synchronize. Bidirectional information transmission begins.

Can't say how many times I'll think of someone and then the phone rings and it's them.

Thanks for the book rec. Part of this thread intent is disentangling "artificial" or tech based synchronicities, which involve mass data aggregation, psyche profiles, engagement, remote sensing and surveillance, etc. And the organic layer.

>>105855976
Not sure how to phrase this but this all here is quite understandable. Kind of curious how long this thread can roll for until it immediately gets 404'd due to what's being discussed here.

I'd say that the matching function scenario is definitely close to something in regards to applying conscious energy towards a subject. If your consciousness isn't focused in the here, now, and present, it's focused towards something else. That's emotional/spiritual energy going towards and essentially applying towards something else. I guess an equivalent of that which popped up is how the "where's my water" mobile game works where you can throw water at moss and it fills up and does something.

Then I suppose negative thoughtforms or 'conscious parasites' would be the equivalent of the purple poison moss that grows when water touches it. The more water that touches it, eventually the more closer it gets to you, and if it takes all of the water, you're directly affected by it by not being able to shower, which in that case i guess is the equivalent of your life being extremely impacted by these negative thoughtforms that are constantly being given energy and not properly taken care of??

I understand what you're saying except my reinterpretations of it into words simply cannot do well when I am also trying to consider ways to prevent any secret word flags or 'red-alert' markings.

captcha ddh8s

>>>/x/ or meds

>>105856111
this site is dead enough as is, let there be some unique techposting here outside of all of sewage pouring in from the constant 12 year reign of eternal normalfaggot summer

>tfw your experience is suddenly on a thread seemingly orchestrated and shared by organic anons
Back in the day I used to have a party trick getting people to talk on their phones in order to get a certain ad on the apps. It was deterministic until the company stopped paying for the ads I guess. I attribute that to regular surveillance.

But as aforementioned by anon, synchroninstic peculiarities that should be statistically impossible still happen. Specifically the "think of the person, person call you". I'd also like to mention that the thought itself in this instance has a visceral quality to it -unlike a "usual" thought-, which is hard to place into words. I started recording such occurrences and I average a successful prediction rate of .83 in 50ish attempts. Other synchronicities either lead to more wider scoped premonitions or wisdom or nothing until proven otherwise.

But even in cyberspace it's been countless times where my thoughts have influenced the content I've been given. And we are talking here for some really obscure stuff - like getting recomended a lecture on a very specific abstract thing that had 100 views whilst my online behavior could not indicate interest on that (at least in the short term and as far as my perception is concerned). Or getting a video on some ancient cpu architecture or memes that speak a little differently and so on.

So what to make of it? A returning pondering of mine is the chicken or the egg. Did the input given by the algo to me in the past, influence me to be futurely interested in *that* similarly to other people (implying correlation) or did I influence the algorithm presently in some hidden way? But also it hasn't only to do with variations of k-means even on forums where content and communication should be 100% organic and range free.

Honestly I have no clue. Thank you for making this thread.

>>105856498

We must all stick together. Is there a way?

>>105856707
I'm not sure anon. I only hang out here and on lain. The forum posted above has associations with roblox and makes me uncomfortable. If you have better ideas please share.

>>105856707
>>105856813 (me)
well I guess I can email you if you post an email