← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 105863808

19 posts 6 images /g/
Anonymous No.105863808 [Report] >>105863914 >>105864282 >>105864287 >>105864331
Fuck 1nm we in 0.5nm now.
Anonymous No.105863914 [Report] >>105863925
>>105863808 (OP)
did the pic have to be in nenometer?
Anonymous No.105863924 [Report] >>105864333
gay marketing term
Anonymous No.105863925 [Report]
>>105863914
>he fell for the 4k meme
Anonymous No.105863942 [Report] >>105864013 >>105864053 >>105864287
when is quantum tunneling going to stop this arms race.
Anonymous No.105864013 [Report]
>>105863942
As if that matters. Companies fuck their CPUs up anyway
Anonymous No.105864053 [Report] >>105864204
>>105863942
Just put a quantum wall in front of the quantum tunnel
Anonymous No.105864204 [Report]
>>105864053
that would require quantum bricks and quantum mortar.
home depot is fresh out.
Anonymous No.105864282 [Report] >>105864305
>>105863808 (OP)
We are not, sir.
Anonymous No.105864287 [Report] >>105864348 >>105864435
>>105863808 (OP)
the number really is marketing at this stage. not everything in a chip is shrunk down to absolute smallest size.
>>105863942
quantum tunnelling is seen as a nuisance and also useful in the world of electronics. read a book, faggot.
Anonymous No.105864305 [Report] >>105864313
>>105864282
> look at this graph created by a moron that knows nothing about electronics!
no thanks. only the dumbest of dumb fuck retards actually believed chips would keep dramatically increasing in clock speed at this rate. problems with power consumption and heat have pissed on that retard parade.
Anonymous No.105864313 [Report] >>105864319 >>105864327
>>105864305
That graph was made by Intel, sir.
Anonymous No.105864319 [Report]
>>105864313
> retard learns about how corporations just lie to your face with fantasy numbers
fucking retard.
Anonymous No.105864327 [Report]
>>105864313
So, the dumbest of retards.
Anonymous No.105864331 [Report]
>>105863808 (OP)
ain't no reason gooks have the need to make those tiny holes
Anonymous No.105864333 [Report]
>>105863924
spbp
Anonymous No.105864348 [Report] >>105864392
>>105864287
what good is it when your transistor is just a conductor because all your potential leaks right through it?
>read a book
sorry your mom keeps me busy at night. i'm surprised you have any time, what with all the random faggot buttsex you have with dudes in public places. stop touching little kids you piece of shit.
Anonymous No.105864392 [Report]
>>105864348
>what good is it when your transistor is just a conductor because all your potential leaks right through it?
works for flash memory
> has a mental breakdown
embarrassing
Anonymous No.105864435 [Report]
>>105864287
>the number really is marketing at this stage. not everything in a chip is shrunk down to absolute smallest size.
For a good reason. Not everything in a digital chip operates at the highest frequency and area savings from basic blocks aren't that critical.
For analog chips, there are other reasons why you don't always use minimum even with the devices that can use the smallest channel length.

Feature size is not necessarily purely for marketing is what I'm getting at. It does provide some information about the process.