>mfw i realize that pdfs are the literally only people who care about the linux gui having any resemblance of security and access controls
freetards man sometimes you just can't make this shit up

>be kid
>"uh no encryption is not about child porn there are plenty of legitimate uses for it like, uhh, keeping the government out of your business"
>grow up
>realize it was literally all about child porn all along

man i just don't like random people knowing shit about me. i don't trust the general population, okay? people are out there to fuck with my head.

>>105867799
nvm. i fell for a shitty bait thread god strike me down or whatever.

without encryption ISPs will just inject ads into your HTTP stream
imagine making credit card payments without SSL

And yet the world's greatest pedophile, the Epster himself, apparently kept his extensive collection of CSAM unencrypted.

>Post bait thread
>10 mins later no one replies
>post again in the thread crying again
>10 mins later still no reply, cry again.
These people actually got nothing going on in their lives.

>>105867748
So that's the reason windows enables bitlocker by default, right?

>>105867748
>not encrypting your mobile devices (laptops, tablets and/or smartphones) to block Tyrone (or your local equivalent jogger fauna speciment) from accessing your shit if manages to steal it from you
Ngtm

shut it with your algospeak brown gen alpha