How bad and widespread is hardware level surveillance?

>>105869369 (OP)
Every major and vital component.
We're cooked.

bad enough that if you start to tell your colleagues about it you'll sound like you're losing your damn mind, you're better off talking about the jews

>>105869392
>>105869394
If I was in court, and courts weren't kangaroo court... how would I prove it?

>when a white buddhist gets added to the palantir dronestrike kill list after his daily intel chip backdoor scan detects pictures of a swastika saved

>>105869413
depends on your jury and their beliefs

i'd always start off with one of these

https://www.theverge.com/2025/1/22/24349582/google-israel-defense-forces-idf-contract-gaza

https://apnews.com/article/ring-amazon-camera-police-request-56a128dcd77a4cb0b27d71be9384fe1a

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/apr/07/tesla-intimate-car-camera-images-shared

>>105869474
Thank you. It's a good starting point and lead me into the start of a deep dive. I remember there being good evidence for hardware level spying on home computers, but I can't seem to find anything on it. Anyone remember any articles or stored archives?

>Diet Shasta

>>105869369 (OP)
>CVE
it all makes sense now

Ah shit my post is gone.

Anyways I'll do a brief summary of what I found instead.

Der spiegel reported 10 years ago about NSA backdoors (Ant catalog).

Snowden reported among other things the interception of routers from supply chain to install hardware NSA backdoors.

Bloomberg reported the chinese adding microchips as backdoors into computers for business espionage.

Barium apt group was another chinese state funded supply chain level backdoors to get access specifically to game companies.

Russia too seems to target supply chain of computers to install their backdoors, or so reports CISA anyways.

>>105869413
It would require them to approve a full blown audit of all code involved in the product by a neutral investigator (that you'd have to fund), and then you have to assume they don't hide information on the backdoors and lie publicly (they do)

>>105874207
I mean I ended up finding a number of credible reports as I lined up in my post above yours. I gave courts as a thought experiment, but it was more about being able to support it to inquisitive friends than actual legal scenario.

>>105874090
Wow it’s almost like it was a bad idea to outsource producing the bedrock of civilization to a foreign country who is a frenemy at the best of times.

>>105869369 (OP)
you cannot escape.