Thread 105873820

Intel CEO drops TRUKE on Intel employees

inteljeets... it's over

>>105873878
Imagine the retarded internal pitches he was getting to put a lid on "catching up to Nvidia" pipe dream bluntly like that.

>just one more node shrink bro, we'll nail 18A and get trillion dollar AI orders

>>105873820 (OP)
its spelled *TRVKE

>>105873820 (OP)
Maybe they can focus on making hardware for consumers while Nvidia rides the AI train

>>105873820 (OP)
Does that mean they can focus on delivering affordable high-quality GPUs?

>>105873820 (OP)
If Intel dies will all the people still using Intel hardware get raped without driver updates?

>>105874409
I'm sure Broadcom will buy it then sue all Intel existing users if they don't subscribe to a $8000/user/yr support plan.

>>105874432
I'm fucked...

Quick! Send more CHIPS money!

>>105874409
Intel already deleted the driver pages for their older hardware from their site

>>105874589
Sometimes they disapear and come back. But yea for old ones they are removed, try the intel program they got i think the download links are still valid and keep the installers from it.

>>105873820 (OP)
The last guy was better. He was actually trying.

>>105873904
If Intel released *one* high core count device even if it wasn't super power efficient they'd probably sell a ton just because people really hate dealing with Nvidia.

>>105874761
It's not just the core counts, it's the memory bandwidth.

Guh... i'm moolti-threading!

>>105873878
Just letting the ones who want to jump ship do so before they are laid off.

>>105873878
>you call yourself a "chipmaker", you son of a bitch?

>>105873878
he's telling them the truth though
how long was until stuck on 14nm for? How many stupid ideas did they pursue and lose money on?

They have a legitimate threat on their hands when it comes to Nvidia developing CPUs, and AMD is eating their lunch in the server space. If they don't get their shit together and focus the company will be completely irrelevant as IT managers start to realize that Apple hardware is just better.

>>105874749
Gelsinger may have been marching Intel to hell but at least we knew where we were going
This dumb chink is the tech equivalent of Sleepy Joe, he shows up every two months, says absolutely nothing of worth other than a fucking basketball analogy or how humble he is, and then disappears for the next two months leaving all his subordinates to communicate what the fuck we’re supposed to be doing
My BU was supposedly one of the "lucky" ones, and we lost 20% of our front line engineers and our entire documentation, installer, and marketing teams (kek on the last one but still)
Honestly wouldn’t be a problem if we were allowed to reengineer our software to use industry standard open source packages, but this chink has also publicly stated that he wants to make more things absolutely proprietary to safeguard muh heckin IPerino, so at this point none of us know how we’re going to ship our product, how our customers are going to know how to use our product, or how our customer will even know we have a product at all
I don’t care what this dumb chink faggot is publicly saying, he has to be prepping the company to be broken up and sold off in pieces, it’s the only way our engineers having gone half a fucking year still not knowing what our product lineup is supposed to be makes sense, there is no future product lineup

I thought the answer was more jeets and roasties?

How could this be when Biden invested taxpayer money in the company?

intel ceo needs to cut israeli operations and hire more asians/white guys and intel will be good. easy.

>kills Larrabee/xeon phi
>removes avx512, no avx1024 and 2048
>tries to compete in gaming gpus when the money is in GPGPU and AI
>kills better packaging, MCM (this saved intel), L4 cache, Optane
>hires crap, tries to create a walled garden with x86, itanium
>can't innovate but keeps the chauvinistic mindset against AMD, Nvidia, TSMC, new packaging, no-x86, etc
No shit!

>CEO admits he fails
>But I'm not going to quit goyim I'd rather axe 5000 of you
>Enjoy your severance
Clown world.

>>105873820 (OP)

three hundred versions of low tdp processor

search laptop with item from 2016 see two laptops listed

>>105875520
LMAO that's a good one.

>>105875520
Damn... That's fucked up.

>>105875832
Never ever invest effort in software that isn't under the GPL. Corpos will cut their face off to keep the next quarter's report above guidance even if it means they'll die of infection a year later.

>>105875726
That money came with some foul tasting pills.

>>105876163
As if this matters.
Remember when Verizon et al were given taxpayer money to connect rural households to the information superhighway? They took the money and used it to buy out other companies then didn't build shit

buy the dip

>>105876244
I already bought the dip a couple years ago.

>>105873820 (OP)
well it's not helping them catch up laying off all of their employees

>>105876244
>25 years long dip

>>105876259
>>105876306
trust the plan
patriots are in charge

huh, if they put as much effort into R&D as they did into DEI maybe this fate could have been avoided

>>105873820 (OP)
Well, obviously. That's what happens when all important positions in the company are given to literal 80 IQ jeets and/or young, whorish women.

>>105873820 (OP)
Is this person also related to leatherjacket man?

>>105873820 (OP)
Does anyone know if they are dumping fab people or design people? It should be obvious what their future direction is from who gets fired. Oregon I would think design that is what the media is saying. Strange.

>>105876609
Fab people were cut this week. There will very likely be more in december.

>>105876778
Oregon state budget is going to crater
De-industrialization 2.0

>>105876609
>>105876942
Doesn't matter, it's already like Mexico here as soon as you leave your ivory tower and go outside.

>>105873820 (OP)
>it's "too late" to catch Nvidia in AI training
the fuck does he mean by "too late"? is there a DEADLINE?
do startup rocket launching companies just not try at all, because SpaceX already can do it better?
loser

>>105875520
>he has to be prepping the company to be broken up and sold off in pieces
what do you mean prepping? He already sold off the NUC business to ASUS and canceled a bunch of shit.

Intel is so thoroughly infected with the DEI disease that it will take them a good 5 years to remove it without selling entire divisions, so that's probably what will happen.

They'll sell the GPU division to AMD, keep FPGA. If they are smart they will abandon the gaming desktop segment altogether and retask those engineers to build RISC-V based chips for server and push it hard as the only "big RISC-V" chip for hyperscalers, undercutting Ampere by leveraging economies of scale and taking advantage of the additional margin from not having to pay ARM. They could easily start selling RVA23 servers to AWS/GCP/Azure for boring webserver workloads and FaaS with very little risk, we've already seen AWS build their own ARM-based chips.

If they're smart they'd start an additional RISC-V business for microcontrollers and lock down IoT in our hemisphere through a high-trust marketing model (their chips won't have chinese backdoors, etc.).

On the AI front I think Intel needs to just cede that ground altogether, I don't know a single person that uses OpenVINO willingly, or uses the Xeon AI.

They also need to completely abandon low-power. ARM chips still thoroughly destroy any low-power x86 chip and the best chips intel has are still from 12th-gen.

Sell Gaudi to whoever will take it.

>>105877397
they can't catch up because they have no market share + nobody smart wants to work for them. you need one or the other to increase one or the other, they have neither.

>>105874795
This probably. More open than most CEOs on that scummy shit.

I dont know much about all this but all I can tell you is that I get a lot of tickets from intel customers of our product and they are usually outstandingly retarded and user error/wontfix. My company has paid me a good amount to prove to intel customers that their netlist is fucking wrong.

>>105877650
>, keep FPGA.
They don't own Altera anymore...

>>105876609
They're cutting everything. Tan's philosophy is that there are no sacred cows in the company, so everything needs to be downsized because they can only do so much and need to focus on reducing costs immediately for shareholders and he'll work from there. He did say he'll focus on minimizing middle management but I think people mistaked it for not touching anything else at all when he was somewhat clear he had to get Intel back to profitabiltiy before anything else. I disagree with him cutting on fab because it was the thing that Pat invested and protected and where they are closest to regaining some sort of leadership. The fact that they cut there in spite of its importance in Intel's strategy is dumbfounding to me.
>>105877650
>sell the GPU division to AMD
Not happening, even if Tan is conceding they won't reach Nvidia in training in any reasonable time, they have to keep GPU because AI is that central and they need some GPU to actually make iGPUs at least.
>keep FPGA
FPGA is minority share now, it's practically gone.
https://newsroom.intel.com/corporate/intel-partner-deal-news-april2025
>RISC-V
This is all retarded when Intel already cancelled Pathfinder for RISC-V and Horse Creek under Pat. They need to reinvest way more to make it viable. I doubt it will amount to anything if they tried, Intel needs margin and profit now.
>AI
The fact you are only sprouting OpenVINO and have only anecdotal evidence for its usage is amazingly ignorant. OpenVINO is the primary means you run diffusion via plugin with GIMP and Krita. That by itself is already a huge big userbase. And talking about OpenVINO is only one of their frontends for using AI on their hardware. They got support for a lot more using oneAPI.

>>105873820 (OP)
they were too late 5 years ago. not even AMD can beat them in their own game. why would Intel?

>>105877650
They should hire you to give them ideas on what not do

>>105875726
Last time I checked in 24 only firms actually paid out from CHIPS were like 5 defense chips companies, intel didn't get anything

>>105876163
All of this is bullshit. It literally just reworded existing anti-discrimination laws

>>105874761
People hate dealing with intel too

>>105874409

no they will not get the pleasure maybe recieve invoice around 18 euros to smoothen next visit outdoors

captcha dw404 btw

>>105878265

shit worked fulltime in sales 20 years ago and cannot m+ this canon calculator soon everybody knows i am not worth pee in glassware

So what are the top 10 semiconductor companies?

t. tourist

He's wrong.
He's wrong because Intel are good at a niche and software. It's the only part of Intel that's actually been decent over the last 10 years.
Networking, chipsets, software.

Once you realise Nvidia is built on CUDA and is only entrenched in the scene, you also realise that they can be overtaken by good support. That is if AI is a long term game and not a bubble.
If you're accepting it's a bubble then you're accepting the 2-4 years you can do well are worthless because you'd have never overtaken Jensen's housefires.
Actually delivering enterprise products similar to what Nvidia is doing, yeah, if they could do that, make a bunch of gimmick sbc tier devices too and continue what they're doing with openvino they'd be on track to rape AMD and cut out a segment in the market. There's room for them to move beyond too, work with alphabet, work with Huawei etc.
>>105877650
>sell to AMD
You're a fucking monster and you deserve to be drowned in your bathtub with a suicide note written by a toddler left nearby.
That would be a crime, sending any of that talent to die at AMD.

>>105875520
You know...when you put it like that.
He sounds exactly like Jensen Huang.

It's time for the markets to wake up.

>>105877958
>They're cutting everything. Tan's philosophy is that there are no sacred cows in the company, so everything needs to be downsized because they can only do so much and need to focus on reducing costs immediately for shareholders and he'll work from there
Has technocracy from ideologues with a vision ever worked? Do people really wet themselves at the idea of meeting Rory Read, Nick Clegg or George Osborne in a Costco car park?

>>105873820 (OP)
I personally believe Intel is not diverse enough, they should hire more minorities, specially black women.

>>105875664
can you imagine how many useless motherfuckers got hired by Intel during the scamdemic?

>>105878376
>talent
most of that talent already left a decade ago.

they lost the game so hard, apple started making their own silicon.

servers are amd because faster, cheaper, lower power consumption.
consumers, they dropped the ball with the past few gens.

beside the point, and amd does this as well, requiring 100% more power for an extra 10% of performance, who ever thought that was the way to go...

and let's not forget that amd runs all gaming consoles. i know, who the fuck cares about consoles, but it's a metric nonetheless.

intel was rock solid, the only reputation they had left. and even that was squandered. just let it die.

>>105878392
Yeah, but you basically leave no margin for error once you cut that far to make bets that will pay off. Rory Read is the only one who arguably did everything right under that scheme and got evicted before he saw his fruits of labor pay off with Lisa. It's quite clear she coasted quite a bit on what he did, look how long it took for her to come around with an AI strategy, absolutely embarassing, and the state AMD left Threadripper and mobile in and squandered the goodwill and gains they made in those segments even though they could've won those segments handily with barely any competition.
What bets do Intel actually have right now? And what are they willing to do to make it to the finish line of profitability? AMD sold off and leased back their own corporate HQ in the days before Zen released to get it over the finish line. My assessment is that they have exactly three things. GPU at firesale prices compared to the other two, their little/E core which is competitive and beats most E cores in the industry even from ARM and foundry. But none of them have stable backing and foundation, they were basically almost like flukes or pockets of success. Intel not investing more into those areas and cutting from them before doing that is a huge mistake.

>>105873820 (OP)
Why would it be too late? All you do is dump data into an optimiser. The only hard part is getting data, but Intel should have decades worth of data so it wouldn't be a problem.
These fucking boomers still don't understand the internet and barely able to use email but they're making decisions on AI now.