no it hasn't

>>105877754 (OP)
nigger?

>>105877754 (OP)
>surpasses H.264 in you're path

>>105877805
>0.00000069420x encoding speed

>>105877754 (OP)
>cant cope with any resolution higher than 4k
its over

>>105877754 (OP)
h265 is significantly better than h264 and h266 is significantly better than h265
i stick with h264 anyway because it's compatible with all websites, computers and phones (nothing else even comes close)

Still the 1080p king desu. I don't get why anyone or any release groups bother with HEVC for 1080p SDR. CRF 17 that shit with x264 my nigga

>>105877938
>he doesn't have a chip in the hardware specifically for decoding and encoding av1

>>105877938
>>105878832
Isn't preset 8 SVT AV1 like 50% more efficient than H264?

>>105877938
This isn't the case anymore. I can encode using SVT-AV1 at greater than 1x speed, and it'll still produce a better video than x264 at very slow preset, which also takes longer.

>>105879065
>a better video
doubt it

>>105879084
You could just try it yourself. Take any video and run it through both, then compare. x265 already yields better video quality, although you have to turn off 2 things when dealing with grainy content.

>>105879143
I have. H.264 looks better

>>105879304
At the same exact bitrate and encoding time? If so, then I don't believe you. That would mean all other reports of x265 & AV1 being better are false, which is unbelievable to claim. You're clearly either trolling or arguing in bad faith.

>>105878832
>Here is software B, which is better than software A. For it to work, you need additional hardware, which software A does not need.
Consoomer.

>>105879659
YEs you get a better thing for more money thats craaaaaaazy

>>105877754 (OP)

dude where is this 30Mbps 720p mp4 torrent?

>>105880285
>Doubling down on the consoomer brain virus
>Not even able to grasp reality outside of the frame of consumerism
Grim.

>>105880326
All I know is that H264 is gonna rape my disk while AV1 will gently pat it, that is all I am interested in, the technology which is superior for my use case

>>105879065
>>105878832
I got hardware encoding for AV1 and it is horribly slow and makes it burn.
Fuck those bullshit high-compression low-bitrate format!
Encoding and decoding speed IS important and i am not using your disgusting slow slop, just to help google save 0.001 shekels on bandwidth costs.

mpv.conf
ytdl-format=bestvideo[vcodec!*=av01]+bestaudio/best

Suddenly everything runs much faster and in higher quality. It is weird how that works.

>>105880398
What the fuck are you talking about? how is this about google? I am just trying to save on disk space, I don't give a shit how fast or slow OBS encodes or decodes my video when I save a 2 minute replay buffer at 12k vbr_lat bitrate, What are you even doing that your hardware encoding is having an issue with it? I am genuinely interested

>>105880420
So you are telling me that you have a RTX 40 series upwards (first with AV1 hardware encoding), but you can't afford 1 MB of disk space?

>>105880398
>I got hardware encoding for AV1 and it is horribly slow
Not my experience. Again, it's faster than 1x speed and that's with using a Ryzen 5600 CPU. Even on preset 8, it produces better video quality than x264 veryslow and does it faster. Are you using libaom, SVT, or rav1e?

>>105880570
wELL, i am a pooron SO i got a 7800xt which does all my encoding without fault, all my clips save instantly though not because of av1 but because of fast nvme plus replay buffer holds its shit in ram, and my old clips used to be fucking huge so im trying to watch the size

H.264 just seemed to revolutionize video in a way that newer codecs just haven't managed to do. Yeah, AV1 is very impressive... at saving the ultra kikes at google pennies.

>Bunch of retards that don't understand codecs writing posts about codecs
As usual /g/ has no idea about software. Reminder the main dev of x264 trooned out years ago and is a mentally insane faggot. Reminder I don't give a fuck about patents and anyone that uses "hardware encoding" is a dumb faggot.

t. Developing codecs since 1998.

>>105882253
You forgot to add NTA to your comment.
NTA.

>>105880776
the av1 encoder in rdna 3 is literally the same efficiency as the h265 one, and they both are just on par with x264 veryslow, way behind nvenc
I have an rx 7600 myself, the av1 encoder is completely useless, what's your use case for encoding av1 with such encoder? very curious.
oh it also cannot encode 1920x1080 without rescaling it to 1920x1088 so yeah lol

>>105880776
>all my clips save instantly though not because of av1 but because of fast nvme
this doesn't make any sense
there's no way saving a 30/60 second even 100 mbps clip is enough to bog down a sata ssd
a 550 mb clip would take one second on a 550 mb/s (6 gbps) sata drive, that's a one minute 100 mbps clip
really no idea what the fuck you are talking about here

>>105880398
>I got hardware encoding for AV1 and it is horribly slow and makes it burn.
this makes no sense, what hardware would that be?
on amd rdna 3 cards av1 is the fastest and most efficient codec to encode (500+ fps for 1080p if also decoded through the gpu)
I have a very strong suspect you don't even know what hardware encode is or how to use it and are actually just talking out of your ass

>>105878976
bumping for this

I've been using AV1 and desu after testing 265 and av1 those two have video seeking problems and 264 seems to be fine, thinking if i should start recording in 264 again.

>>105884045
SVT defaults to 10 second keyframe intervals to cause unending pain and suffering to the keyframe extraction autists. It's honestly a good feature of AV1 and you should never change it.

ffmpeg -i in.mp4 -f segment -reset_timestamps 1 -c:v copy -an keyframe%%4d.mkv

for %%s in (keyframe*.mkv) do (
ffmpeg -i %%s -frames:v 1 -c:v copy -still-picture 1 "%%~ns.avif"
)

https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/105386595/#105393981

>>105884045
av1 encoders usually have shitty defaults and often have too little keyframes, yes.
but i don't think i've ever faced any seeking problem with h265 ever, and it's my most used codec by far (both consumption and encoding myself)
>recording
so you are just using your gpu's encoder to record stuff? well that's weird because hw encoders usually do lots and lots of keyframes, sometimes b-frames aren't even supported.
I think you just have something wrong with your obs configuration or sumthing idk, you might also be using a shitty media player or a badly configured one too

AV1 is canonically contained in MP4 files, so you can transparently replace all H.264 encodings without laymen ever knowing.

>>105877938
AV1 is 10x faster than vp9

>>105884857
but this site doesn't allow av1 in either webm or mp4 kek

>>105886581
Don't worry, they'll get to it as soon as they put the finishing touches on jpeg2000 support support.

For me it's crf q24 fast

>>105877754 (OP)
Literally eprecated by av1 and h265
>b-b-but it doesn't work on my 12 year old proce- ACK