>60hz refresh rate
What the fuck is this, Apple? What fucking year do you think this is?

>>105898252 (OP)
lads, it's apple cattle
60hz is more than enough for basic tasks

It's for professional use.

Video editing and shit. They don't need gaymen high FPS because it's not a child's toy.

The only real issue here is the batshit insane price tag.

>>105898298
MacBook Pros come with 120hz displays

>>105898298
Higher refresh rates are more pleasant to the eye even when you're not playing games

>>105898328
Frankly I don't want to get used to 120Hz as I don't want 60Hz to look crap

>>105898313
I have an MBP and it goes up to 120Hz but it does variable refresh rate and usually doesn’t bother with higher than 60
The only time I notice the extra hertz is when I’m switching between workspaces
I also have a 120Hz-capable iPad and plug it into a 60Hz monitor and it just looks a little less washed out when scrolling
I have an old Linux machine that does 4K@30Hz and I’d rather have the extra sharpness always than the smoothness only when something on the screen is moving
it kind of sucks having choppy mouse-pointer updates at 30Hz, though

>>105898252 (OP)
Have you checked the release dates for those? They’re old
Apple releases a new monitor like every five years or ten

>>105898328
>Higher refresh rates are more pleasant to the eye even when you're not playing games
Not going to lie, anon. I own a 1440p 144hz monitor and a 4k 60fps one, I don't give a fuck about the trail I see while moving things around in the 4k monitor.

>>105898252 (OP)
>>105898328
show me 5k and 6k 120Hz monitors. I'll wait

>>105898252 (OP)
>NEC

>>105899103
Fine, I'll make some in my garage

>>105898252 (OP)
MacOS still doesn't support refresh rates above 60hz. SAD!

Apple laptops cost like 6000 euros if you take the top spec

all my monitors are 60. my main gaming monitor is 120.

Apple has the history of making most baffling displays out of any manufacturer
they kept to 60hz wayyyy beyond others
the pixel response times were switch 2 tier
and ofc the apples fans paid double for the pleasure of using the slowest, low hz displays with an apple logo

>>105898252 (OP)
>It's expensive but also trash
You're paying for Apple's marketing budget and access to the vaginas of fellow AppleSlop purchasers. That's literally all there is to it.

>>105898298
High refresh rate displays are also VRR capable you fucking retard, which means you can watch 24, 48, 50 fps content without stutters unlike on static 60 Hz panel. But I guess so called "professionals" doesn't care about that, right?

it's for employed designers, useless waste of money for anyone on /g/

>it's for employed designers
Yeah, I totally forgot that Apple is a professional grade equipment company, not consumer grade low quality trash

>>105899843
glad to have reminded you

>>105898344
>i don't wanna leave the cave and see the world, then i won't like the cave anymore.
you don't have to go back to the cave retard.

>>105898252 (OP)
>>105898313
doesnt even matter when their response times are 10x slower than walmart budget trash
crapple currynigger screens are all crippled to 10hz equivalent by its response times in all real world use cases
you can't even watch a 24fps movie from the 80s on a currybook without the entire screen becoming a runny blurry smear

iNiggers WILLINGLY pay 1000% more to get 10% the product
they are literal subhuman trash beneath even literal actual niggers in intelligence

They should sell a 24 Hz ultra deluxe pro screen for $10K

>>105899967
iTODDLERS BTFO

>>105898252 (OP)
Pro Display XDR is horribly outdated now. it has only 500-dimming zones (macbooks have 2500 dimming zones). you can buy a chink 160Hz HDR1000 miniLED with 1500-dimming zones for less than $500

>>105898298
What if I want to edit 120fps videos?

>>105899975
oh my god, imagine the cinematic experience

>>105898252 (OP)
iTODDLERS BTFO