Looks like someone pointed out to Lunchud, who was using more filters than an OnlyThots or Instathot, that using extensive video filters was hypocritical in light of his staunch anti-AI stance.
All of his recent videos now use a pixel art version of himself.
AI skeptics will be at a disadvantage going forward in how they present themselves online, not being able to make themselves look as young and attractive as AI proponents, which will help sway normie opinions towards being pro-AI.

>>105905229 (OP)
It's interesting that on one side you have jews and their freaks, on the other side as opposition and normal person you have another jew.
Are they just trying to make sure that (((they))) will never be mentioned as the source of the problems being disguised?
All of the AI in the west is also held by Jews.

>>105905229 (OP)
It's especially obvious when you compare some of Lunduke's vids from a year or two ago.
The recent ones look like blurry, choppy messes by comparison.

>>105905432
>Are they just trying to make sure that (((they))) will never be mentioned as the source of the problems being disguised?
It's more that Jews tend to be very arrogant and have unduly high opinions of themselves, their accomplishments, and their ideas, so they're much more likely to think other people need to hear what they have to say than a normal person would.

>>105905229 (OP)
Microsoft: https://unlocked.microsoft.com/pride/
Apple: https://www.apple.com/us/search/lgbt?src=globalnav
Linux: ... wait, Linux doesn't have official support for LGBT? wtf?? They only say something about being hetero white male and everyone using Linux is a nazi, right wing and all the Youtubers recommending Linux are right wing. B-but OP is spamming anti-Linux threads 24/7. What this means?

>>105905701
>. B-but OP is spamming anti-Linux threads 24/7
I'm not anti-Linux (typing this on Fedora).
But Lunduke's heavy filtering was obvious, and I've mocked him for it, not even because of his anti-AI stance, but just because of the vanity.
Now all of the sudden, no more filters, and he's doing the pixelart cope instead.

>>105905229 (OP)
>this is about politics, not just software
Why and when did everything go to shit? I recall back in 2013 things were still okay'ish.

>>105905229 (OP)
Son, filters have been around longer than what people call “AI” “existed”
You’ve obviously never watched any star trek scenes with beverly crusher in them.

>>105906004
as is usually the answer, didn't gatekeep hard enough.

>>105906066
The ones he's using are the more recent, AI ones.