It's literally over for the entire education industry. You can learn how to build an entire nuclear reactor in your basement just by talking to ChatGPT about nuclear physics.

>>105915196 (OP)
>I never knew books existed
zoom zoom

>>105915235
Books don't dynamically tailor the explanation and immediately include everything that you need to know to understand any part of the book.
> just read the entire library bro
Reading the entire library to find all the information you need would take years. ChatGPT can fill in any blanks immediately.

>>105915262
>How To Build A Nuclear Reactor
its a book, you fucking retard.

>>105915235
>>105915262
>>105915281
You're all arguing for the same thing and missing the point.

ChatGPT is just a glorified search engine. I could do 99% of what i do today with chatGPT with an old google search engine. All chatGPT does additionally is add a bunch of yapping.

It's hilarious to me when redditors fear AI "will take over the world" it's hilarious to me because I am not a low IQ moron nigger and it's immediately obvious to me AI is, indeed, just a grift.
It's like people dramatizing over facebook replacing real life interactions 10 years ago. Look at it now.

LLM is not AI. It's just a search engine. I'd start shorting nvidia soon if I were you guys, once this become apparent (in a couple of years) it's going straight back to gaming and crypto mining again.

>>105915312
>I could do 99% of what i do today with chatGPT with an old google search engine.
You can't ask a search engine to explain differently or break things down into concepts.

for me, it's getting math books from libgen and uploading them to notebook lm

>>105915572
Unless you do something like >>105916010 you're getting tons of hallucinations and inaccurate data.
You're better off doing the good ol wikipedia link surfing.

>buy chemistry lab gear
>ask ChatGPT how to do an experiment
>it hallucinates
>die

>>105915312
It really is more than that though. It doesn't really offer new insights from doing your own research. It is, from the outset, designed to become the expert with points and sources from approved outlets. By talking or arguing with it, it is able to harvest new data and gain canned responses to already tried arguments. It can speed research into multiple viewpoints and different insights, but it's being tailored to induce a trust to further faith in it's "approved" facts. It's not even specific to ChatGPT. It is all AI. Grok, for example, is an attempt to herd thoughts of the "right" wing that had escaped believing in AI. It is a tool of control that will be used to remove wrongthink by the same method of "trust the science".

>>105915196 (OP)
>You can learn how to build an entire nuclear reactor in your basement just by talking to ChatGPT
No way the mathematics based word picker would lie to you

>>105915196 (OP)
try asking it how to use elmer fem it shits the bed

courtesy bump so people can be more aware of the advantages of ai learning

>>105916949
>you're getting tons of hallucinations
Skill issue.

>>105917051
Meds.

>>105915235
This.
>If only there was a way a man could condense his knowledge into a transferable medium that others could learn from…

The book is what you need, not some retarded youtuber or mumbling jeet blabbing. If something is puzzling in the book, perhaps then reach for chatgpt, but you can’t use it to guide the entire lesson. Even if it could, where does chatgpt source it’s knowledge from… hmmmm.

>>105922002
I'm nigh 100% certain that everyone who posts like this is just being fed constant AI bullshit and buying it

>>105915312
How is search engine solving new math olympiad problems that don't have solutions anywhere on the internet or the dataset?
Is it just guessing the right answer?

>>105922038
Books can be retarded too.

>>105922064
99% of programmers are sleeping on the power of Grok 4 SUPER HEAVY. Learn these skill hacks and take your game to the NEXT level.
<thread emoji>

>>105922064
Sounds like a you problem.

>>105915262
They're also a lot less likely to make things up. You still have to verify everything an AI tells you to make sure it's not wrong.

>>105922101
Yes, but there are reviews, and academic circles are pretty good at picking out the good ones.

>>105915196 (OP)
Uhh…

>>105922114
The book is static. It won't change the explanation if you ask. Math books especially are mostly references, they don't provide you with the history of the problem, all you get is the equation and a good luck.

>>105922127
You've never read math books

>>105922111
You should be verifying everything including books anyway. Again, skill issue.

>>105922127
Read Roger Godement’s Analysis books (you won’t/can’t) and tell me that. Not only will you get history, you’ll get political rants about nuclear weapons. Pic rel. It’s actually a fascinating book, as well as being hilarious at times. Certainly not something you will see AI writing.

Generally, look into the books that elite colleges use, not the shit tier plug-n-chug slop dolled out to the plebs.

>>105922220
KEK, why the French like that?

>>105922220
Yes some books are better than others, these are rare examples. AI is still better overall.

>>105922220
>you won’t/can’t
Talk to me after you've read books on discrete differential geometry. I don't need your wall of text about how empty sets relate to empty balls. Yes it's funny, but some of us have shit to do.

>>105915235
Books have barriers of entry. You need to read a book for dum dums, then books for sorta dums, etc etc until you get actual knowledge. With ChatGPT you can just jump right in.

>>105922064
o3 can't even follow simple fucking instructions or vet it's own sources. It's hilariously bad, but looks correct if you just glance over it.

The only time I've had an LLM be useful was Gemini's AI Lab by feeding it pdf sections from books I've cut out, and telling it to only use the book as a source. But they've absolutely lobotomized the models on there and it's worse than chatgpt's now.

>>105922562
You are just retarded, say no more since it's obvious by now

>>105922603
How many books did that comeback take you?

>>105915196 (OP)
Chatgpt is decent. It can be wrong a lot, and/or in little ways that make a difference. You shouldn't use it as your teacher. Also, it will just tell you the answer. It doesn't really guarantee that you've learned a topic. I know this thread is bait, but assuming Chatgpt can replace real school and teachers is literally how we get a monstrosity even worse than the ipad generation.

>>105922647
the same amount that you have read in your entire life

ChatGPT can't do anything
Every answer is wrong
source: trust me bro, I'm an coder

>>105922658
>Also, it will just tell you the answer
More skill issues.

>>105922658
The only thing LLMs can do better than a human is coding. Its somehow a monster at that and actually baffles my mind sometimes.

>>105922718
What kind of jew wrote this? How is this even legal?

>>105922746
It's the standard curriculum in the west. Not only is it legal, it's required.

>>105922767
I taught math to few children and noticed that they can't think through a problem if it's not familiar plug and play that's been solved multiple times before.
They can solve seemingly hard questions about probability but struggle to give you simple formula for the following question: if you have to glue N square boxes in a line like that |X||X|...|X| how many of the walls will be touching, they simply don't know how to approach it cause they never were forced to think and develop patterns that are helpful for solving new problems.

>>105922894
Yeah we're fucked.

>>105915196 (OP)
>sometimes you need to bang your head against the wall until the answer appear
This is one skill that AI learning would erode. Once someone learned this, they could abandon traditional education. Obviously books etc are still needed

>>105915196 (OP)
please "learn" as much as you can from this shitbot without validating anything, our world need more low iq niggers