How do we secure our systems from Chinese hackers if tech companies are hiring Chinese workers

>>105917880 (OP)
By making it FOSS, steinman

>>105917893
>>105917880 (OP)
Asians are better programmers than white fags. I’ve never met a white guy that was better than an Asian dude in my work place.

>Not wanting china to win
You must be crazy. Look at chongqing then look at detroit. Our rules hate us, we're better off under god emperor xi

>company hires smart people (chinks) instead of dumb people (fat retarded lazy mutts) to do important work
What a travesty.

>>105917880 (OP)
>not even the indian top management at microsoft would hire indians to "help maintain DOD computer systems"
lmao

>>105917904
the chinese* are better programmers, do not lump them with the subhumans in india

>>105917880 (OP)
>A j*w seethes over chinese recruits, but applauds when a swarm of 20000 pajeets to replace over 9000 (mostly white) laid off workers.

>>105917880 (OP)
If the spoiled babies in America would accept wages more in line with their low place in the traditional social hierarchy, the trillion dollar company could afford to employ them instead of being forced to look to cultures that have a realistic valuation of this type of labor.

>>105917880 (OP)
在美国的中国公民必须遵守美国法律。他们不是国家安全的威胁。任何从事国防部相关项目的员工都必须由国务院进行审查。微软是清白的

They contract out for everything tangentially DoD related these days. They were always beholden to the highest bidder due to mandatory privatization, so when contractors are DEI'ed out, guess who wins? The chinamen holding all the money to buy up the middle-men.

Face it. They play the money game better than we do. They had scholar-officials for 500 years before we ever even thought of the enlightenment. Not all the brains, but all the bureaucracy.

Now move on from the petrodollar, nationalize every industry, and decriminalize shit that keeps your people in strata (zoning laws, "drug" laws, remote worker laws).

>>105917880 (OP)
Chinese citizens in the United States must abide by United States laws. They are not a national security threat. Any employee working on a Department of Defense related project must be vetted by the State Department. Microsoft is innocent of any potential charges. They are legal.

>>105917880 (OP)
Hmm, why not hire WHITE AMERICANS instead?

Surely there's enough WHITE AMERICAN talent to build security systems of the government?

>>105920121
You want hire? Then do good job. Be better than Chinese Nationals. Prove worth.

>>105920121
Don't call me Shirley.

>>105917880 (OP)
>make it literally illegal to not maximize shareholder profits (see dodge brothers v ford)
>guys why are they hiring cheap Chinese labor?!?!?!?!!?!?!? this is treason!!!

>>105920212
>Chinese workers are actually cheaper than white labor

Actually untrue. The US is massively overpaying these Chinese workers to lure them out of China.

>>105920212
people often misinterpret and straight up lie about the dodge vs ford case. the issue wasn't about maximize profits but henry ford's role as a controlling shareholder using his power to potentially oppress minority shareholders. dodge brothers only had a 10% stake in the company, and fords decision didn't take those who invested in the company into consideration, which retroactively disfranchised lower shareholders who had a smaller investment. particularity, to hurt shareholders lesser than him.
remember, dodge brothers at the time where using the dividends they were receiving to fund their OWN car manufacturer to compete with ford. it is known ford was not happy about this.

the court intervened because this amounted to an abuse of discretion, not so much over "ensuring shareholders are able to maximize profit." it was to make sure, that those with majority share, do not purposefully make decisions that will NEGATIVELY hurt lesser shareholders.

majority shareholders have a duty to ensure lesser shareholders can achieve success, like them. the top cannot profit from the bottom.

>>105920308
thank you for correcting the record, next you're going to try and tell me that the dodge brothers weren't jewish and their logo didn't have the demonic jew symbol on it

>>105920308
the decision also helped prevent:
>someone creating a business
>make it public to allow public investments
>soak up the money
>turn around and use the money only on yourself
>nothing is returned to those who invested
a publicly traded company is not a slush fund for the majority shareholder(s) can do as they please. money must trickle down.

>>105920356
i do not give a shit about your jewish crap. i only care about morons not understanding dodge vs ford case.

>>105920356
Ford was actually the "Jew" in this case. He felt entitled to the profit dividends and didn't want to share it with the other shareholders. He felt as the founder, the leader, and majority stakeholder in Ford, he deserved it. He also HATED competition, and didn't have a good standing with the Dodge brothers as they were competing with him. Ford pretending that "oh, I am really a working class man and want to share the wealth with my employees instead and give back to the community" was all bullshit to hide the fact, he wanted the money himself and Dodge being shareholders themselves, made him more mad he had to share money with them.
Anon is right in his post that the case was about ensuring those with smaller investments in the company were not taken advantage of by those with controlling stake.

>>105917992
You'd expect ppl to earn less than the ppl who call them inferior.

>>105917904
No, they aren't, idiot. And were you work is a dump.

>>105920275
It's not that surprising. That guy was previously part of Google's Deepmind, and apparently basically the father of Chatgpt o3 and o4. The top of the top of the top in tech has always been paid literally absurd amounts of money. This guy is probably one of the smartest people in the world.

>>105920905
i had no idea sri lankans were smarter than chinese