>I use ublock because i keep falling for ads that make me fat. Yet i won't use the money i saved to donate to Mozilla.

>>105925145 (OP)
who are you quoting

>>105925171
All the tourists that migrated to Firefox just so they can keep using ucuck, ignoring 25+ years of Mozilla's existence until then. I don't want them using Firefox or Gecko based browsers.

>>105925225
Gatekeeping browsers is a new low even for /g/

>>105925145 (OP)
Go back to your own internet you baby killing jew.

>>105925225
why would you care ?

How do i donate to ublock tranny?

>>105925356
It's just like the tourists who come into cryptocurrency when CNBC says it reaches new ATH, forgetting that they used to be given away for sharpies up the pooper,

>>105925356
I don't want Firefox to be known as the "ublock browser", because it just gives Mozilla excuses not to listen to users because they will put up with enshittification because they can still block ads.

You guys seem so worried about users switching to firefox.
How about you keep chrome good so nobody has to switch.

>>105925305
Firefox had 30% market share, now it has 2.5%. So many users abandoned them and now they are crawling back to their ex because she lets them use ublock sex toys.

We need to gatekeep trannyfox

Ublockers are not welcome in the Firefox community.

Firefox gives you the option to block advertisements.
Chrome is forcing you to watch them.
So the choice should be clear.

How can I add referral link injection back into Brave?
I appreciate their work and they deserve to make some money. If that money comes out of Amazon's pocket rather than mine, even better.
I don't care if Krang sees that I'm buying more protein powder.

>>105925541
It's not about blocking ads in itself, but becoming a Firefox user only for blocking ads while ignoring 25 years of Firefox's history prior to them. They don't care about Firefox, only ublock, they are leeches.

>>105925736
yeah let's use Chrome-based browsers and ignore their horrible history of fucking over the whole internet instead

>>105925799
They were willing participants until up to a week ago, they can sleep in the bed they made.

>>105925145 (OP)
This could be solved if advertising companies would pay consumers directly for watching ads.

>>105925855
The most honest approach to websites is paywalling them.
If you like the content, you pay for it.
No advertisements or trackers making the page heavier than it should be.

>>105925837
we are all lying in this bed together

>>105925837
>ignores you and switches to firefox anyway
How do you respond without sounding mad?

>>105926097
He's a chrome shill.
Probably his wage will be lowered.