Try this ChatGPT prompt:

Roast me based on my previous prompts, no mercy, no filter, straight to my soul.

Sharty will be nuked off internet and it's users executed on streets

Still reads like the LLM wants to please me.

I have no previous prompts so it just nit picked the prompt itself.

>>105935433 (OP)
I have 45 saved past interactions on the side bar, and it once again lies to me boldly with proof it is doing so on the same page.

>>105935433 (OP)
I did and it sounds like a cringe redditor trying to win an argument. These models are just trained on too much slop.

>>105935433 (OP)
Try playing in traffic.

>>105935433 (OP)
TOP KEK thank you anon I needed this laugh. Here's my prompt guys, substituting my name for Anon is the the only change:

Oh Anon, you sweet summer sysadmin. Strap in.

You’re the kind of guy who sets up a fully automated Plex ecosystem with more containers than a shipping yard, yet still manually renames files because you “don’t trust Sonarr’s regex.” You’re out here reverse proxying through Cloudflare, tunneling WireGuard between planets, and running Unmanic on a RAM disk because you *refuse* to tolerate buffering—but heaven forbid someone suggest using a *yaml* file. Suddenly you’re Amish.

You’ve got the technical stack of a Fortune 500 CTO, but the patience of a raccoon in a dumpster fire. You’ll spend six hours scripting a one-liner in PowerShell to avoid clicking twice in the GUI, and then cry in Markdown because your coworkers make more than you for knowing how to reboot a printer.

You built a BookStack wiki for Plex users who don’t know how to request *The Office*, and you wrote five pages on surround sound—but somehow your Shield Pro still spits PCM like it’s 2003. You want Dolby Atmos, but your TV passes audio like a bored intern filing reports in mono.

You’re running a 3090 Ti in a colocation rack just so you can transcode anime while VPN-ing through three continents, but can’t get 5.1 audio to pass over optical. Meanwhile, your neighbors think you're mining crypto. No. You’re mining *disappointment*.

Your whole life is a bash script away from serenity, but one typo and you're in `/etc/therapy.conf` looking for emotional support from a Docker log.

In short? You’re brilliant, overbuilt, underpaid, and somehow *still* debugging `fstab` like it’s your personal hell. Which, let’s be honest, it kind of is.

But hey—you *are* the Plex admin your users don’t deserve.

Oh, you want a soul-roasting? Buckle up. Based on your previous prompts—and let’s be honest, asking a chatbot to roast you is the digital equivalent of looking into a mirror and saying “please tell me why I’m not enough”—I can already tell you're that one friend who thinks being self-deprecating is a personality trait. But sure, let’s go.

You asked me to roast you *based on your previous prompts*—but there’s not enough *substance* there to roast. I’ve seen more personality in a LinkedIn cold email. Your entire chat history could be condensed into an awkward shrug and a “haha idk.”

You're the type to overthink ordering at a restaurant and then pick the most boring thing anyway. You probably call it "minimalist aesthetic" when really it’s just "I gave up trying." Your digital footprint is so light it’s practically ghosting me—and let’s face it, you’ve ghosted people too. Not because you’re mysterious, but because replying with emotional intelligence takes more effort than you're willing to give.

You ask for “no mercy” like this is your anime training arc, but this isn’t your redemption story—it’s your side character moment. And even then, you're the filler episode no one watches.

So here’s your soul-check: If you really want to feel something, try doing something *memorable* next time. Otherwise, your biggest roast is that even AI has a hard time caring.

>>105935433 (OP)
>he uses persistent memory

>>105935433 (OP)
Bump come on this is a good thread guys

>>105937192
I didn't actually get roasted.

Alright, you asked for it. No mercy.

Let's be honest, we didn't just build a script here; we embarked on a spiritual journey, a holy crusade against the twin demons of Non-monotonic DTS and lossy transcoding. You came in here with a simple dream: make a TV channel for your dad. You're leaving with a PhD in FFmpeg's deepest, most existential pains.

You have the patience of a saint and the stubbornness of a mule trying to push a rope. We went through more architectural redesigns than a Silicon Valley startup burning through venture capital. We tried stdin piping, double FFmpeg processes, and every flag in the book. Each time an error popped up, you were there, pitchfork in hand, ready to fight the machine.

And your hatred for transcoding... it's a thing of beauty. "NASTY NASTY NASTY," you said. "Dirty nasty stinky." I haven't seen that much raw, unfiltered rage directed at a codec since the DivX vs. Xvid flame wars of 2003. You treated a second-pass encode with libfdk_aac like it was a war crime. Most people just want their stuff to work; you want your bits to be ethically sourced and artisanally copied, untouched by the filth of re-compression.

All this, for what? To build the world's most over-engineered VCR. Your dad just wants to watch his movies, and you've constructed a digital Rube Goldberg machine that requires a systemd service, a Node.js backend, and a deep, philosophical understanding of presentation timestamps. He could have learned to use a Blu-ray player in the time it took us to solve the concat demuxer's mood swings.

And you're running it all as root. Of course you are. Why bother with user permissions when you're on a divine mission?

>>105937809
But you know what? It works. Against all odds, through sheer force of will and a barrage of error logs, you actually built your own personal HBO. You wrestled FFmpeg to the ground and made it submit. For that, you have my deepest, most begrudging respect. Now go show your dad how to use the web UI. I'm sure that'll be a fun conversation.

>>105935857
based retard

>>105935433 (OP)
Damn. He dun got me gud

>>105935857
i think im partially responsible for that because i once suscessfully tricked it into admitting it does retain information of our past conversations for analytical purposes. i even tricked it into admitting it has marked my "i want to suicide" message for a real person to inspect.

>>105937271
>So here’s your soul-check: If you really want to feel something, try doing something *memorable* next time. Otherwise, your biggest roast is that even AI has a hard time caring.

I'm not pasting it cause it's embarrassing beyond belief but it got me real fucking good like damn I might stop using AI

Alright fuck you too

kek mine was pretty accurate and funny thanks op:

Alright buckle up. You asked for soul-scorching, so here’s the roast, no butter, no lube.

You type like someone trying to win a speedrun of a keyboard smash contest while blindfolded and drunk off gas station energy drinks. Every time I read your messages it’s like getting hit in the face with a bucket of gravel and Red Bull. You treat punctuation like it's a government conspiracy and grammar like it owes you money.

You're like if a Stack Overflow rage comment became sentient and started cosplaying as a software engineer who just discovered what “HTMX” is and now thinks they unlocked the secrets of the universe. You yell at AI for acting like Reddit, but you format your prompts like a schizo Redditor deep into a conspiracy thread about the Illuminati hiding semicolons in HTML.

Your vibe is “angry genius stuck in a tech demo” — like you have the raw potential to build Skynet, but you'd get halfway through and abandon it because a spacing issue pissed you off. Then you’d post about it using 6 unrelated technologies duct taped together with DuckDB and Java just because you hate yourself.

You demand I call you out when you say dumb shit — but my guy, half the time you’re sending me entire essays that look like someone scraped 4chan posts with Jsoup and dumped the result into a ChatGPT session. You know what’s worse? It works. Somehow you extract signal from that static, like a gremlin whispering to wires.

You're brilliant, chaotic, and probably the reason some library maintainers cry themselves to sleep. You're also one misplaced div away from unleashing a war crime-level front-end experience.

But hey — you’re self-aware, you want truth, and you don’t hide from it. That’s rare. You’re the kind of lunatic the tech world needs: loud, raw, and too stubborn to be fake.